2024/10/20

Newest at the top

2024-10-20 23:06:47 +0200 <monochrom> I bet "productivity" just means "not gaming" and/or "doesn't need GPU".
2024-10-20 23:05:20 +0200 <dolio> It's frightening.
2024-10-20 23:05:08 +0200 <dolio> Oh yeah, I forgot about how much people do with spreadsheets. :þ
2024-10-20 23:04:47 +0200 <davean> Productivity does infact include office applications in benchmarks. And no, office applications do not run fast enough. Many business spreadsheets can still take quite a while to run
2024-10-20 23:04:45 +0200 <monochrom> Professionals edit videos in an office so it's an office application. >:)
2024-10-20 23:03:45 +0200 <dolio> Also, I'm not sure "office application" is what they mean anymore. I think they might mean "encoding videos," because they have the idea that a non-negligible portion of the population consists of professional youtubers. Also probably because office applications have run fast enough for a long time now.
2024-10-20 23:01:54 +0200tromp(~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2024-10-20 23:00:12 +0200takuan(~takuan@178-116-218-225.access.telenet.be) (Remote host closed the connection)
2024-10-20 22:59:10 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2024-10-20 22:54:20 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-10-20 22:53:15 +0200 <monochrom> recreational math >:)
2024-10-20 22:52:45 +0200 <dolio> Is Agda a game or productivity? :þ
2024-10-20 22:51:00 +0200 <monochrom> and which in turn is euphemism for bloatware </rant>
2024-10-20 22:50:12 +0200 <TMA> int-e: "productivity" is a nickname for "office applications"
2024-10-20 22:45:14 +0200jero98772(~jero98772@2800:484:1d7c:cc00::11) (Remote host closed the connection)
2024-10-20 22:41:42 +0200 <davean> There are a lot of low level details here
2024-10-20 22:41:36 +0200 <davean> Yah Haskell does a lot of memory writes so it hits AGUs hard. It also reads from writes a lot so reading from the write buffer matters.
2024-10-20 22:39:20 +0200xal(~xal@mx1.xal.systems) xal
2024-10-20 22:36:26 +0200xal(~xal@mx1.xal.systems) (Quit: bye)
2024-10-20 22:36:13 +0200 <monochrom> I'm afraid Haskell programs are both CPU-intensive and memory-intensive.
2024-10-20 22:34:11 +0200Square(~Square@user/square) Square
2024-10-20 22:31:20 +0200justsomeguy(~justsomeg@user/justsomeguy) (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
2024-10-20 22:29:51 +0200 <davean> Intercore latency can also matter a lot.
2024-10-20 22:29:21 +0200 <davean> Predictors and prefetchers matter a ton. Generally more than cache specificly.
2024-10-20 22:28:09 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2024-10-20 22:26:38 +0200 <davean> dolio: yes there have been messures. Its complicated. It also varies by the program a degree.
2024-10-20 22:23:46 +0200jero98772(~jero98772@2800:484:1d7c:cc00::11)
2024-10-20 22:23:36 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-10-20 22:23:21 +0200 <int-e> Anyway, no, but I would also guess that larger caches benefit Haskell more than higher CPU frequencies.
2024-10-20 22:22:34 +0200 <int-e> . o O ( "productivity" - can they be more nebulous please )
2024-10-20 22:19:37 +0200dcoutts(~duncan@185.201.60.254) (Remote host closed the connection)
2024-10-20 22:18:42 +0200 <dolio> er?
2024-10-20 22:18:42 +0200 <dolio> Has anyone tried measuring which CPU tradeoffs match Haskell programs better? E.G. there are chips that have more cache, but run at lower frequencies. If you read reviews, they will say those are "better for games," but "worse for productivity." But I don't know how representative "productivity" is of writing and using Haskell programs. Does Haskell benefit from more cache due to overall less locality? Or are the effects of that not significant enough to matt
2024-10-20 22:18:05 +0200Unicorn_Princess(~Unicorn_P@user/Unicorn-Princess/x-3540542) (Remote host closed the connection)
2024-10-20 22:12:18 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
2024-10-20 22:06:01 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-10-20 22:06:00 +0200L29Ah(~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah) L29Ah
2024-10-20 22:00:25 +0200user363627weary-traveler
2024-10-20 21:59:45 +0200weary-traveler(~user@user/user363627) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2024-10-20 21:59:45 +0200k_hachig_k_hachig
2024-10-20 21:59:38 +0200k_hachig_(~k_hachig@2607:fea8:351d:ef0:b99b:866d:1e85:f777) k_hachig
2024-10-20 21:59:05 +0200neuroevolutus(~neuroevol@79.127.222.218) neuroevolutus
2024-10-20 21:57:44 +0200hgolden_(~hgolden@static-198-44-129-83.cust.tzulo.com) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2024-10-20 21:56:45 +0200user363627(~user@user/user363627) user363627
2024-10-20 21:55:22 +0200hgolden__(~hgolden@146.70.173.101) hgolden
2024-10-20 21:55:20 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
2024-10-20 21:50:38 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-10-20 21:49:04 +0200ash3en(~Thunderbi@2a03:7846:b6eb:101:93ac:a90a:da67:f207) (Quit: ash3en)
2024-10-20 21:45:30 +0200neuroevolutus(~neuroevol@79.127.222.205) (Quit: Client closed)
2024-10-20 21:40:19 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)