2024/10/20

Newest at the top

2024-10-21 00:14:14 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2024-10-21 00:09:20 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-10-20 23:58:10 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2024-10-20 23:52:02 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-10-20 23:51:01 +0200target_i(~target_i@user/target-i/x-6023099) (Quit: leaving)
2024-10-20 23:48:43 +0200rmca(~rob@188.120.84.50) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2024-10-20 23:48:10 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
2024-10-20 23:43:08 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-10-20 23:39:10 +0200 <dmj`> go's static linking is cool
2024-10-20 23:38:07 +0200 <dmj`> rust are probably big due to inlining
2024-10-20 23:32:31 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2024-10-20 23:27:46 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-10-20 23:27:42 +0200szkl(uid110435@id-110435.uxbridge.irccloud.com) (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
2024-10-20 23:27:13 +0200neuroevolutus(~neuroevol@79.127.222.218) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
2024-10-20 23:25:45 +0200joeyadams(~joeyadams@syn-184-054-105-097.res.spectrum.com) (Quit: Leaving)
2024-10-20 23:15:02 +0200 <identity> ellyse_e: rust executables are not really special in that regard, go's easily balloon too
2024-10-20 23:13:57 +0200 <davean> monochrom: right, no one sells consumer PCs for scientific, thats the field of HPC/Supercomputer sales or at the very least specialized workstations.
2024-10-20 23:13:11 +0200 <Franciman> cool, thanks
2024-10-20 23:11:33 +0200 <haskellbridge> <ellyse_e> Franciman: i think rust executables are notoriously large, zig is a better example in release mode
2024-10-20 23:11:31 +0200 <monochrom> I mean, sure, if you go to an app store, they have a much richer classification than game vs productivity (e.g., in that context, productivity does mean office applications; video processing has its own class). But in the context of selling PCs, it's really the very simplistic trichotomy of GPU-bound, video editing, neither (which is nicknamed "productivity").
2024-10-20 23:11:23 +0200 <davean> Franciman: There are Haskell compilers that can do 127kB but they're limited ones.
2024-10-20 23:11:01 +0200 <dmj`> "modern C"
2024-10-20 23:09:51 +0200lxsameer(~lxsameer@Serene/lxsameer) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2024-10-20 23:09:22 +0200 <Franciman> i think the same goes for all other modern languages, except maybe rust?
2024-10-20 23:08:58 +0200 <dmj`> not if you're linking with the rts
2024-10-20 23:08:37 +0200 <Franciman> can't have a 127kb haskell executable
2024-10-20 23:08:30 +0200 <Franciman> most modern stuff is bloatware
2024-10-20 23:08:24 +0200 <Franciman> most haskell software is bloatware too lol
2024-10-20 23:07:30 +0200 <int-e> . o O ( gaming but the game is Factorio )
2024-10-20 23:07:26 +0200 <davean> My understanding is productivity doesn't include scientific workloads either.
2024-10-20 23:06:47 +0200 <monochrom> I bet "productivity" just means "not gaming" and/or "doesn't need GPU".
2024-10-20 23:05:20 +0200 <dolio> It's frightening.
2024-10-20 23:05:08 +0200 <dolio> Oh yeah, I forgot about how much people do with spreadsheets. :þ
2024-10-20 23:04:47 +0200 <davean> Productivity does infact include office applications in benchmarks. And no, office applications do not run fast enough. Many business spreadsheets can still take quite a while to run
2024-10-20 23:04:45 +0200 <monochrom> Professionals edit videos in an office so it's an office application. >:)
2024-10-20 23:03:45 +0200 <dolio> Also, I'm not sure "office application" is what they mean anymore. I think they might mean "encoding videos," because they have the idea that a non-negligible portion of the population consists of professional youtubers. Also probably because office applications have run fast enough for a long time now.
2024-10-20 23:01:54 +0200tromp(~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2024-10-20 23:00:12 +0200takuan(~takuan@178-116-218-225.access.telenet.be) (Remote host closed the connection)
2024-10-20 22:59:10 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2024-10-20 22:54:20 +0200merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-10-20 22:53:15 +0200 <monochrom> recreational math >:)
2024-10-20 22:52:45 +0200 <dolio> Is Agda a game or productivity? :þ
2024-10-20 22:51:00 +0200 <monochrom> and which in turn is euphemism for bloatware </rant>
2024-10-20 22:50:12 +0200 <TMA> int-e: "productivity" is a nickname for "office applications"
2024-10-20 22:45:14 +0200jero98772(~jero98772@2800:484:1d7c:cc00::11) (Remote host closed the connection)
2024-10-20 22:41:42 +0200 <davean> There are a lot of low level details here
2024-10-20 22:41:36 +0200 <davean> Yah Haskell does a lot of memory writes so it hits AGUs hard. It also reads from writes a lot so reading from the write buffer matters.
2024-10-20 22:39:20 +0200xal(~xal@mx1.xal.systems) xal
2024-10-20 22:36:26 +0200xal(~xal@mx1.xal.systems) (Quit: bye)
2024-10-20 22:36:13 +0200 <monochrom> I'm afraid Haskell programs are both CPU-intensive and memory-intensive.