2026/02/04

Newest at the top

2026-02-04 23:06:47 +0100 <gentauro> with regard to LEAN, I like the following explanation from Charles Hoskinson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3snIzhjqsk0 (academic papers tend to loose insights, so by providing a more formal framework, we might have better insights)
2026-02-04 23:05:05 +0100vanishingideal(~vanishing@user/vanishingideal) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2026-02-04 23:02:01 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2026-02-04 22:57:25 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-02-04 22:55:54 +0100tromp(~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:10a6:5d4a:b26:4065)
2026-02-04 22:54:37 +0100target_i(~target_i@user/target-i/x-6023099) (Quit: leaving)
2026-02-04 22:52:46 +0100marinelli(~weechat@gateway/tor-sasl/marinelli) marinelli
2026-02-04 22:52:46 +0100hakutaku(~textual@user/hakutaku) hakutaku
2026-02-04 22:52:19 +0100hakutaku(~textual@user/hakutaku) (Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2026-02-04 22:51:56 +0100 <jreicher> Better not to test in prod though, of course.
2026-02-04 22:51:21 +0100 <jreicher> Verification by humans will never completely go away. When people die, there's general agreement the software might have done the wrong thing.
2026-02-04 22:48:53 +0100tromp(~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:10a6:5d4a:b26:4065) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2026-02-04 22:48:43 +0100marinelli(~weechat@gateway/tor-sasl/marinelli) (Quit: marinelli)
2026-02-04 22:46:29 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2026-02-04 22:46:19 +0100cyphase(~cyphase@user/cyphase) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2026-02-04 22:44:31 +0100takuan(~takuan@d8D86B9E9.access.telenet.be) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2026-02-04 22:41:40 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-02-04 22:39:51 +0100michalz(~michalz@185.246.207.218) (Remote host closed the connection)
2026-02-04 22:39:48 +0100 <monochrom> Well, in the limit, minimize both verification by humans and synthesis by humans. We're getting there!
2026-02-04 22:38:51 +0100 <monochrom> Industry wants to minimize proofs-by-humans. So they will take automated checks, or more recently, proofs-by-AI.
2026-02-04 22:38:02 +0100Googulator(~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-216f-0081-f2ad-9e0f-9d89.pool6.digikabel.hu)
2026-02-04 22:37:46 +0100Googulator(~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-216f-0081-f2ad-9e0f-9d89.pool6.digikabel.hu) (Quit: Client closed)
2026-02-04 22:31:13 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2026-02-04 22:27:37 +0100 <jreicher> mesaoptimizer: I don't do Haskell heavily in Emacs, but based on my experience with other languages and what I'm seeing out there I would strongly recommend eglot, regardless of the major mode you choose, and then do your own comparison of haskell-mode vs haskell-ts-mode. (My hunch is the latter is better.)
2026-02-04 22:25:51 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-02-04 22:22:56 +0100acidjnk(~acidjnk@p200300d6e700e57835d41376842fa308.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) acidjnk
2026-02-04 22:22:33 +0100acidjnk(~acidjnk@p200300d6e700e57835d41376842fa308.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Remote host closed the connection)
2026-02-04 22:16:31 +0100AlexZenon(~alzenon@85.174.181.199) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2026-02-04 22:15:19 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2026-02-04 22:14:23 +0100trickard_(~trickard@cpe-61-98-47-163.wireline.com.au)
2026-02-04 22:14:13 +0100AlexZenon_2(~alzenon@85.174.181.199)
2026-02-04 22:14:10 +0100trickard(~trickard@cpe-61-98-47-163.wireline.com.au) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2026-02-04 22:12:13 +0100AlexZenon_2(~alzenon@85.174.181.199) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2026-02-04 22:12:11 +0100AlexZenon(~alzenon@85.174.181.199)
2026-02-04 22:10:28 +0100AlexZenon(~alzenon@85.174.181.199) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2026-02-04 22:10:05 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-02-04 22:07:47 +0100AlexZenon_2(~alzenon@85.174.181.199)
2026-02-04 22:05:26 +0100AlexZenon(~alzenon@85.174.181.199)
2026-02-04 22:04:42 +0100pavonia(~user@user/siracusa) siracusa
2026-02-04 22:02:34 +0100AlexZenon(~alzenon@85.174.181.199) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
2026-02-04 21:58:51 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2026-02-04 21:58:11 +0100housemate(~housemate@202.7.248.67) housemate
2026-02-04 21:54:17 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-02-04 21:44:56 +0100Googulator2Googulator
2026-02-04 21:44:15 +0100 <tomsmeding> perhaps that's overly reductive. But maybe the same holds for proof systems in general; industry use of formal methods seems to saturate around the point of model checking
2026-02-04 21:43:13 +0100 <tomsmeding> systems for formalising mathematics are not very attractive to industry, I'd wager
2026-02-04 21:43:00 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2026-02-04 21:36:14 +0100vidak(~vidak@2407:e400:7800:2c01:d0be:76f8:cc84:bd4a) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2026-02-04 21:36:13 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-02-04 21:28:29 +0100Googulator27(~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-216f-0081-f2ad-9e0f-9d89.pool6.digikabel.hu) (Quit: Client closed)