2025/11/26

Newest at the top

2025-11-26 19:52:33 +0100 <haskellbridge> <sm> Square3 I don't advocate heedless ai use, but I think you must try it yourself to know. It also needs to be qualified - which AI, which AI-based coding tools, which kind of code
2025-11-26 19:52:27 +0100target_i(~target_i@user/target-i/x-6023099) target_i
2025-11-26 19:51:54 +0100chele(~chele@user/chele) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-11-26 19:51:12 +0100 <geekosaur> or wants to replace employees they have to pay with AI they don't
2025-11-26 19:50:44 +0100 <Square3> Interesting to hear
2025-11-26 19:48:51 +0100 <int-e> "for themselves" - I mean nobody wants to read the results
2025-11-26 19:48:15 +0100 <int-e> I feel that when it comes to writing, nobody wants AI for themselves; people think (or hope) that the output is good enough to sell to others for money.
2025-11-26 19:47:48 +0100 <EvanR> harry potter fanfiction has a different standard than uh
2025-11-26 19:47:23 +0100 <EvanR> it depends on who is judging the quality
2025-11-26 19:47:02 +0100 <haskellbridge> <Zemyla> AI isn't good at literature or poetry either.
2025-11-26 19:46:37 +0100 <EvanR> it makes programming sound more like literature or poetry not math
2025-11-26 19:46:03 +0100Googulator45(~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-4ad8-f42e-6d50-f4ab-2863.pool6.digikabel.hu)
2025-11-26 19:45:56 +0100Googulator17(~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-4ad8-f42e-6d50-f4ab-2863.pool6.digikabel.hu) (Quit: Client closed)
2025-11-26 19:45:43 +0100 <EvanR> programming is funny. The body of code we have varies wildly in quality, people can't agree on what good quality means, and we invent AI but it doesn't help the question of quality either
2025-11-26 19:43:23 +0100EvanR(~EvanR@user/evanr) EvanR
2025-11-26 19:43:04 +0100EvanR(~EvanR@user/evanr) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-11-26 19:41:45 +0100 <haskellbridge> <sm> can be a very helpful assist, or generating at least simple/boilerplate/starting-point code
2025-11-26 19:41:33 +0100 <geekosaur> current AI is only as useful as the data it's scraped, and there isn't enough scrapable Haskell code for it to do anything resembling a good job
2025-11-26 19:41:06 +0100ss4(~wootehfoo@user/wootehfoot) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-11-26 19:39:49 +0100EvanR(~EvanR@user/evanr) EvanR
2025-11-26 19:38:57 +0100 <Square3> s/but only/but I only/
2025-11-26 19:38:34 +0100 <Square3> I'm sceptical-agnostic on AI's usefulness in programming. It surely has it's uses but only occassionally use it. What are your take on AI's usefullness in generating Haskell code?
2025-11-26 19:37:31 +0100humasect(~humasect@dyn-192-249-132-90.nexicom.net) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-11-26 19:33:11 +0100takuan(~takuan@d8D86B9E9.access.telenet.be)
2025-11-26 19:31:49 +0100takuan_dozo(~takuan@d8D86B9E9.access.telenet.be) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2025-11-26 19:28:09 +0100EvanR(~EvanR@user/evanr) (Quit: Leaving)
2025-11-26 19:25:54 +0100Anarchos(~Anarchos@91-161-254-16.subs.proxad.net) Anarchos
2025-11-26 19:24:54 +0100wickedjargon(~user@207.194.126.6) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-11-26 19:22:52 +0100Frostillicus(~Frostilli@pool-71-174-119-69.bstnma.fios.verizon.net) (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
2025-11-26 19:21:21 +0100ft(~ft@p508db844.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) ft
2025-11-26 19:15:43 +0100Frostillicus(~Frostilli@pool-71-174-119-69.bstnma.fios.verizon.net)
2025-11-26 19:12:58 +0100Everything(~Everythin@172-232-54-192.ip.linodeusercontent.com) (Quit: leaving)
2025-11-26 19:08:11 +0100Tuplanolla(~Tuplanoll@91-152-225-194.elisa-laajakaista.fi) Tuplanolla
2025-11-26 19:02:17 +0100simplystuart(~simplystu@c-75-75-152-164.hsd1.pa.comcast.net)
2025-11-26 19:01:49 +0100simplystuart(~simplystu@c-75-75-152-164.hsd1.pa.comcast.net) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2025-11-26 19:01:25 +0100picnoir(~picnoir@about/aquilenet/vodoo/NinjaTrappeur) NinjaTrappeur
2025-11-26 19:00:06 +0100sord937(~sord937@gateway/tor-sasl/sord937) (Quit: sord937)
2025-11-26 19:00:00 +0100picnoir(~picnoir@about/aquilenet/vodoo/NinjaTrappeur) (Quit: WeeChat 4.7.1)
2025-11-26 18:52:07 +0100forell(~forell@user/forell) forell
2025-11-26 18:51:01 +0100forell(~forell@user/forell) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2025-11-26 18:50:16 +0100trickard_(~trickard@cpe-86-98-47-163.wireline.com.au)
2025-11-26 18:50:02 +0100trickard_(~trickard@cpe-86-98-47-163.wireline.com.au) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-11-26 18:47:39 +0100pointlessslippe-(~pointless@62.106.85.17)
2025-11-26 18:46:49 +0100pointlessslippe1(~pointless@62.106.85.17) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2025-11-26 18:40:57 +0100wickedjargon(~user@207.194.126.6) wickedjargon
2025-11-26 18:39:02 +0100sindu(~sindu@2.148.32.207.tmi.telenormobil.no)
2025-11-26 18:37:29 +0100confusedalex(~confuseda@user/confusedalex) confusedalex
2025-11-26 18:33:55 +0100notzmv(~umar@user/notzmv) notzmv
2025-11-26 18:32:14 +0100yin(~zero@user/zero) zero
2025-11-26 18:31:54 +0100ff(~user@207.194.126.6) (Remote host closed the connection)