Newest at the top
| 2025-11-13 15:27:15 +0100 | biberu | (~biberu@user/biberu) biberu |
| 2025-11-13 15:22:48 +0100 | <gentauro> | iirc, wasn't one of the op's of this channel also an op at Libera? |
| 2025-11-13 15:20:53 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@77.242.116.146) merijn |
| 2025-11-13 15:20:05 +0100 | biberu | (~biberu@user/biberu) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2025-11-13 15:17:54 +0100 | deptype_ | (~deptype@2406:b400:3a:73c2:8859:e21d:8034:1343) |
| 2025-11-13 15:17:41 +0100 | deptype_ | (~deptype@2406:b400:3a:73c2:ffa7:a8a3:7599:8304) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-11-13 15:15:58 +0100 | <kuribas> | __monty__: yes, but our ORM does both. |
| 2025-11-13 15:15:07 +0100 | <__monty__> | That's not how ORMs work generally, no? Don't they keep everything in the database rather memory? |
| 2025-11-13 15:14:32 +0100 | chromoblob | (~chromoblo@user/chromob1ot1c) chromoblob\0 |
| 2025-11-13 15:14:12 +0100 | chromoblob | (~chromoblo@user/chromob1ot1c) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2025-11-13 15:13:27 +0100 | ystael | (~ystael@user/ystael) ystael |
| 2025-11-13 15:08:59 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
| 2025-11-13 15:07:30 +0100 | lbseale | (~quassel@user/ep1ctetus) ep1ctetus |
| 2025-11-13 15:07:12 +0100 | weary-traveler | (~user@user/user363627) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-11-13 15:07:04 +0100 | lbseale_ | (~quassel@user/ep1ctetus) (Quit: https://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.) |
| 2025-11-13 15:05:51 +0100 | karenw | (~karenw@user/karenw) karenw |
| 2025-11-13 15:02:45 +0100 | karenw | (~karenw@user/karenw) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-11-13 15:02:22 +0100 | karenw | (~karenw@user/karenw) karenw |
| 2025-11-13 15:00:39 +0100 | kuribas | (~user@ip-188-118-57-242.reverse.destiny.be) kuribas |
| 2025-11-13 15:00:29 +0100 | chromoblob | (~chromoblo@user/chromob1ot1c) chromoblob\0 |
| 2025-11-13 14:59:20 +0100 | chromoblob | (~chromoblo@user/chromob1ot1c) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2025-11-13 14:49:19 +0100 | spew | (~spew@user/spew) spew |
| 2025-11-13 14:34:35 +0100 | kuribas` | (~user@ip-188-118-57-242.reverse.destiny.be) (ERC 5.5.0.29.1 (IRC client for GNU Emacs 29.3)) |
| 2025-11-13 14:34:07 +0100 | annamalai | (~annamalai@157.33.224.236) annamalai |
| 2025-11-13 14:33:49 +0100 | <kuribas`> | If he leaves, the company will be in trouble. |
| 2025-11-13 14:25:30 +0100 | <kuribas`> | I hope we get rid of it as soon as possible, since it's maintained by a single guy, who is the only one to understand the whole system. |
| 2025-11-13 14:24:47 +0100 | Lycurgus | (~juan@user/Lycurgus) (Quit: alsoknownas.renjuan.org ( juan@acm.org )) |
| 2025-11-13 14:24:12 +0100 | <kuribas`> | And store in mysql on a triple store. |
| 2025-11-13 14:23:51 +0100 | <kuribas`> | __monty__: yes, everything except time series data. |
| 2025-11-13 14:23:23 +0100 | <__monty__> | The ORM loads all the data into memory? |
| 2025-11-13 14:22:54 +0100 | <kuribas`> | Since restarting the system takes an hour, to populate all the data in the ORM. |
| 2025-11-13 14:22:37 +0100 | <kuribas`> | Also the system is being kept up to date by keeping a running system, then patching it as we go. |
| 2025-11-13 14:22:10 +0100 | <kuribas`> | Also self-documenting values that are real-time inspectable in a UI (which hasn't been used for a decade now). |
| 2025-11-13 14:21:11 +0100 | <kuribas`> | __monty__: it's a whole lisp system with its own type system, an ORM based on a triple store, our own (graphql like) xml query engine, timeseries computations based on linked lists, etc... |
| 2025-11-13 14:19:57 +0100 | <__monty__> | That must be some implementation. |
| 2025-11-13 14:10:59 +0100 | <kuribas`> | Anyway, my current dict implementation is fast enough. For comparison, reading all the configuration files, and constructing this map in python takes less than a second, while in our legacy (lisp) system, it takes several minutes to load and store in the lisp ORM. |
| 2025-11-13 14:02:32 +0100 | CiaoSen | (~Jura@2a02:8071:64e1:da0:5a47:caff:fe78:33db) CiaoSen |
| 2025-11-13 14:01:35 +0100 | acarrico | (~acarrico@pppoe-209-99-223-51.greenmountainaccess.net) |
| 2025-11-13 13:59:47 +0100 | <[exa]> | yeah there's a very fast intersection algorithm for many skiplists |
| 2025-11-13 13:57:01 +0100 | <kuribas`> | [exa]: So you have three maps in parallel, then you intersect? |
| 2025-11-13 13:57:00 +0100 | <merijn> | something, something, lattice theory |
| 2025-11-13 13:55:38 +0100 | <[exa]> | (PS. skiplists are magical) |
| 2025-11-13 13:54:10 +0100 | <kuribas`> | hmm, interesting... |
| 2025-11-13 13:53:47 +0100 | <[exa]> | as in, in the 3-level map model, querying for (whatever, "bar", 3) requires traversing the whole first map; with inversion this is free |
| 2025-11-13 13:52:58 +0100 | <[exa]> | lucene version: make occurence inverted indexes for all key parts that you have, select Very Very Quickly by intersecting the skiplists. (That also gives you infinite wildcard queries for free.) |
| 2025-11-13 13:51:42 +0100 | <kuribas`> | True, putting * in the dictionary is less efficient. |
| 2025-11-13 13:51:07 +0100 | <[exa]> | kuribas`: can be highest; any predictable position is OK |
| 2025-11-13 13:50:51 +0100 | <kuribas`> | [exa]: why lowest? |
| 2025-11-13 13:49:51 +0100 | <kuribas`> | Maybe I can put an index at "a", and "b", since "c" (and d...) are sparse. |
| 2025-11-13 13:49:34 +0100 | <[exa]> | tree version: make * the lowest-ordering item, first select exactly, if that fails select minimum bound of ("foo","haha",whatever) to see if the wildcard is on the 3rd position (you can re-use the partial failed select!), then of ("foo", whatever, whatever) to see if it's on the 2nd position, ... |