2025/10/16

Newest at the top

2025-10-16 15:09:25 +0200GdeVolpiano(~GdeVolpia@user/GdeVolpiano) GdeVolpiano
2025-10-16 15:07:31 +0200GdeVolpiano(~GdeVolpia@user/GdeVolpiano) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-10-16 15:04:35 +0200L29Ah(~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah) L29Ah
2025-10-16 15:04:23 +0200Lycurgus(~juan@user/Lycurgus) (Quit: alsoknownas.renjuan.org ( juan@acm.org ))
2025-10-16 15:03:46 +0200mastarija(~mastarija@9-173.dsl.iskon.hr) (Quit: Client closed)
2025-10-16 15:02:13 +0200trickard_trickard
2025-10-16 15:02:05 +0200divlamir(~divlamir@user/divlamir) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
2025-10-16 15:01:18 +0200tromp(~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:d983:2af2:5deb:9bbb)
2025-10-16 15:01:16 +0200Pozyomka(~pyon@user/pyon) pyon
2025-10-16 15:01:10 +0200GdeVolpiano(~GdeVolpia@user/GdeVolpiano) GdeVolpiano
2025-10-16 14:59:47 +0200arandombit(~arandombi@user/arandombit) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-10-16 14:58:10 +0200divlamir_(~divlamir@user/divlamir) divlamir
2025-10-16 14:55:45 +0200GdeVolpiano(~GdeVolpia@user/GdeVolpiano) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2025-10-16 14:54:51 +0200arandombit(~arandombi@user/arandombit) arandombit
2025-10-16 14:53:19 +0200Frostillicus(~Frostilli@pool-71-174-119-69.bstnma.fios.verizon.net)
2025-10-16 14:47:42 +0200GdeVolpiano(~GdeVolpia@user/GdeVolpiano) GdeVolpiano
2025-10-16 14:46:52 +0200chromoblob(~chromoblo@user/chromob1ot1c) chromoblob\0
2025-10-16 14:46:30 +0200chromoblob(~chromoblo@user/chromob1ot1c) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-10-16 14:45:49 +0200Lycurgus(~juan@user/Lycurgus) Lycurgus
2025-10-16 14:43:32 +0200weary-traveler(~user@user/user363627) user363627
2025-10-16 14:38:04 +0200GdeVolpiano(~GdeVolpia@user/GdeVolpiano) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-10-16 14:27:00 +0200arandombit(~arandombi@user/arandombit) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-10-16 14:26:48 +0200GdeVolpiano(~GdeVolpia@user/GdeVolpiano) GdeVolpiano
2025-10-16 14:26:23 +0200ubert(~Thunderbi@77.119.165.5.wireless.dyn.drei.com) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
2025-10-16 14:22:15 +0200arandombit(~arandombi@user/arandombit) arandombit
2025-10-16 14:22:06 +0200Googulator18Googulator
2025-10-16 14:20:51 +0200ChaiTRex(~ChaiTRex@user/chaitrex) ChaiTRex
2025-10-16 14:20:49 +0200gmg(~user@user/gehmehgeh) gehmehgeh
2025-10-16 14:20:31 +0200bitdex(~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex) bitdex
2025-10-16 14:20:06 +0200bitdex(~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-10-16 14:20:06 +0200gmg(~user@user/gehmehgeh) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-10-16 14:20:06 +0200ChaiTRex(~ChaiTRex@user/chaitrex) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-10-16 14:16:15 +0200craunts795335385(~craunts@136.158.7.194)
2025-10-16 14:16:01 +0200vanishingideal(~vanishing@user/vanishingideal) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2025-10-16 14:15:43 +0200Googulator18(~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-03fa-648b-10cf-62d2-2877.pool6.digikabel.hu)
2025-10-16 14:15:40 +0200Googulator94(~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-03fa-648b-10cf-62d2-2877.pool6.digikabel.hu) (Quit: Client closed)
2025-10-16 14:13:58 +0200fp(~Thunderbi@130.233.70.16) fp
2025-10-16 14:13:16 +0200GdeVolpiano(~GdeVolpia@user/GdeVolpiano) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-10-16 14:12:31 +0200fp(~Thunderbi@wireless-86-50-141-225.open.aalto.fi) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2025-10-16 14:10:51 +0200Googulator67(~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-03fa-648b-10cf-62d2-2877.pool6.digikabel.hu) (Quit: Client closed)
2025-10-16 14:10:37 +0200Googulator94(~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-03fa-648b-10cf-62d2-2877.pool6.digikabel.hu)
2025-10-16 14:01:25 +0200divlamir_divlamir
2025-10-16 14:01:23 +0200divlamir(~divlamir@user/divlamir) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-10-16 14:00:00 +0200divlamir_(~divlamir@user/divlamir) divlamir
2025-10-16 13:59:35 +0200Inline(~inline@2a02:8071:57a1:1260:f555:8f5c:221c:b0e5) Inline
2025-10-16 13:59:13 +0200 <mastarija> e.g.: https://paste.tomsmeding.com/3Ukj4cLW
2025-10-16 13:59:09 +0200 <mastarija> So, reading the documentation for `seq` I've noticed it says it doesn't guarantee the order of evaluation of it's arguments. e.g. if we do `seq a b` b may be evaluated first. This got me thinking, does this mean using `seq` for accumulators may still build thunks until we reach the base case and try to return a value?
2025-10-16 13:56:33 +0200mastarija(~mastarija@9-173.dsl.iskon.hr) mastarija
2025-10-16 13:56:06 +0200chromoblob(~chromoblo@user/chromob1ot1c) chromoblob\0
2025-10-16 13:55:53 +0200Beowulf(florian@2a01:4f9:3b:2d56::2)