Newest at the top
2025-09-10 18:27:20 +0200 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-172-222-149-049.res.spectrum.com) (Ping timeout: 258 seconds) |
2025-09-10 18:21:30 +0200 | petrichor | (~jez@user/petrichor) (Quit: ZNC 1.10.1 - https://znc.in) |
2025-09-10 18:21:12 +0200 | jreicher | (~user@user/jreicher) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
2025-09-10 18:15:23 +0200 | ubert | (~Thunderbi@178.165.191.145.wireless.dyn.drei.com) (Quit: ubert) |
2025-09-10 18:13:35 +0200 | segfaultfizzbuzz | (~segfaultf@23-93-74-222.fiber.dynamic.sonic.net) segfaultfizzbuzz |
2025-09-10 18:10:31 +0200 | segfaultfizzbuzz | (~segfaultf@23-93-74-222.fiber.dynamic.sonic.net) (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) |
2025-09-10 18:09:04 +0200 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-172-222-149-049.res.spectrum.com) peterbecich |
2025-09-10 18:08:56 +0200 | ubert1 | ubert |
2025-09-10 18:08:56 +0200 | ubert | (~Thunderbi@77.119.163.183.wireless.dyn.drei.com) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
2025-09-10 18:07:27 +0200 | ubert1 | (~Thunderbi@178.165.191.145.wireless.dyn.drei.com) ubert |
2025-09-10 18:06:24 +0200 | <dminuoso> | Linear memory access is just stupid fast. |
2025-09-10 18:06:10 +0200 | segfaultfizzbuzz | (~segfaultf@23-93-74-222.fiber.dynamic.sonic.net) segfaultfizzbuzz |
2025-09-10 18:05:52 +0200 | ubert1 | (~Thunderbi@178.165.161.196.wireless.dyn.drei.com) (Ping timeout: 258 seconds) |
2025-09-10 18:05:16 +0200 | <dminuoso> | Even if you go into a hundred elements, chances are its still faster than indirection in the average case. |
2025-09-10 18:04:53 +0200 | user0 | (~user0@67.161.181.189) (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) |
2025-09-10 18:04:36 +0200 | ubert | (~Thunderbi@77.119.163.183.wireless.dyn.drei.com) ubert |
2025-09-10 18:04:12 +0200 | <dminuoso> | kqr: Also regarding the list problem, what merijn said. Never underestimate the power of linear memory access in the presence of strided prefetchers. :-) |
2025-09-10 18:03:54 +0200 | MelodyOwO | (~MelodyOwO@user/MelodyOwO) MelodyOwO |
2025-09-10 18:02:43 +0200 | <dminuoso> | kqr: Well I mean if you want to hack around, nothing stops you from touching theStdGen manually. :-) |
2025-09-10 17:57:06 +0200 | wootehfoot | (~wootehfoo@user/wootehfoot) wootehfoot |
2025-09-10 17:50:03 +0200 | davidlbowman | (~dlb@user/davidlbowman) davidlbowman |
2025-09-10 17:49:36 +0200 | inline | (~inline@ip-005-146-196-014.um05.pools.vodafone-ip.de) Inline |
2025-09-10 17:46:42 +0200 | segfaultfizzbuzz | (~segfaultf@23-93-74-222.fiber.dynamic.sonic.net) (Ping timeout: 258 seconds) |
2025-09-10 17:46:37 +0200 | kaotica | (~user@user/d4q) (leaving) |
2025-09-10 17:46:25 +0200 | <kaotica> | /close |
2025-09-10 17:46:12 +0200 | Everything | (~Everythin@178.137.93.79) Everything |
2025-09-10 17:42:23 +0200 | segfaultfizzbuzz | (~segfaultf@23-93-74-222.fiber.dynamic.sonic.net) segfaultfizzbuzz |
2025-09-10 17:42:09 +0200 | karenw | (~karenw@user/karenw) karenw |
2025-09-10 17:31:59 +0200 | L29Ah | (~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah) L29Ah |
2025-09-10 17:23:04 +0200 | fp | (~Thunderbi@wireless-86-50-141-202.open.aalto.fi) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
2025-09-10 17:22:50 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
2025-09-10 17:17:32 +0200 | lortabac | (~lortabac@2a01:e0a:541:b8f0:55ab:e185:7f81:54a4) (Quit: WeeChat 4.5.2) |
2025-09-10 17:14:20 +0200 | poscat | (~poscat@user/poscat) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
2025-09-10 17:14:03 +0200 | qqe | (~qqq@185.54.23.136) |
2025-09-10 17:12:18 +0200 | poscat0x04 | (~poscat@user/poscat) poscat |
2025-09-10 16:56:24 +0200 | segfaultfizzbuzz | (~segfaultf@23-93-74-222.fiber.dynamic.sonic.net) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
2025-09-10 16:52:27 +0200 | <EvanR> | I see that. Confusing naming then |
2025-09-10 16:52:05 +0200 | <__monty__> | That's what they said re duplicates. |
2025-09-10 16:51:42 +0200 | qqe | (~qqq@185.54.23.136) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
2025-09-10 16:51:23 +0200 | user0 | (~user0@67.161.181.189) |
2025-09-10 16:51:14 +0200 | <EvanR> | you think listWithout x would return a "list" that still has x, just fewer? |
2025-09-10 16:51:05 +0200 | Googulator | (~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-217b-fd1e-c506-2528-080c.pool6.digikabel.hu) |
2025-09-10 16:50:46 +0200 | Googulator | (~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-217b-fd1e-c506-2528-080c.pool6.digikabel.hu) (Quit: Client closed) |
2025-09-10 16:50:44 +0200 | L29Ah | (~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah) () |
2025-09-10 16:50:43 +0200 | <__monty__> | EvanR: Rather than zeroing out it'd be decrementing the count according to their spec. |
2025-09-10 16:50:37 +0200 | <EvanR> | real world use case, your characters inventory is always sorted |
2025-09-10 16:49:49 +0200 | <EvanR> | I'm just fantasizing that population count is all that matters |
2025-09-10 16:49:37 +0200 | <merijn> | For vectors of size 10 the traversal costs are pretty small |
2025-09-10 16:49:23 +0200 | <merijn> | Or just Vector.filter or something |
2025-09-10 16:49:09 +0200 | <EvanR> | "list" without |