2025/05/04

Newest at the top

2025-05-04 15:42:49 +0200la1n(~la1n@85.249.17.224) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-05-04 15:40:46 +0200CiaoSen(~Jura@2a02:8071:64e1:da0:5a47:caff:fe78:33db) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2025-05-04 15:40:27 +0200la1n2(~la1n@176.59.41.59)
2025-05-04 15:35:56 +0200la1n(~la1n@85.249.17.224)
2025-05-04 15:31:49 +0200weary-traveler(~user@user/user363627) user363627
2025-05-04 15:30:02 +0200TimWolla(~timwolla@2a01:4f8:150:6153:beef::6667) TimWolla
2025-05-04 15:29:59 +0200la1n2(~la1n@81.222.176.125) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-05-04 15:29:11 +0200j1n37(~j1n37@user/j1n37) j1n37
2025-05-04 15:28:54 +0200j1n37(~j1n37@user/j1n37) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-05-04 15:26:26 +0200sabathan2(~sabathan@amarseille-159-1-12-107.w86-203.abo.wanadoo.fr)
2025-05-04 15:24:07 +0200TimWolla(~timwolla@2a01:4f8:150:6153:beef::6667) (Quit: Bye)
2025-05-04 15:22:42 +0200sabathan2(~sabathan@amarseille-159-1-12-107.w86-203.abo.wanadoo.fr) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-05-04 15:19:18 +0200bitdex(~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex) bitdex
2025-05-04 15:14:59 +0200AlexZenon_2AlexZenon
2025-05-04 15:12:09 +0200j1n37(~j1n37@user/j1n37) j1n37
2025-05-04 15:11:40 +0200j1n37(~j1n37@user/j1n37) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-05-04 15:06:47 +0200ttybitnik(~ttybitnik@user/wolper) ttybitnik
2025-05-04 15:02:29 +0200 <haskellbridge> <hellwolf> data AThing a = DoSomethingWith a Person | ScamWith a Person
2025-05-04 14:59:44 +0200ljdarj(~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj
2025-05-04 14:58:51 +0200ljdarj(~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2025-05-04 14:57:27 +0200 <[exa]> well screw it, I guess I'll do an A* and blame the heuristics. :D
2025-05-04 14:56:11 +0200CiaoSen(~Jura@2a02:8071:64e1:da0:5a47:caff:fe78:33db) CiaoSen
2025-05-04 14:55:48 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@ip4d17f82f.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de)
2025-05-04 14:55:30 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-131-173.176.6.pool.telefonica.de) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-05-04 14:53:09 +0200aljazmc(~aljazmc@user/aljazmc) (Quit: Leaving)
2025-05-04 14:53:02 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-131-173.176.6.pool.telefonica.de)
2025-05-04 14:51:52 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@ip4d17f82f.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-05-04 14:45:26 +0200 <[exa]> turns out I already classified it as such like 2 years ago :D
2025-05-04 14:44:57 +0200 <[exa]> hellwolf: oh hvm is the thing with the "MAGIC" wannabe meme in the main readme
2025-05-04 14:43:55 +0200lxsameer(~lxsameer@Serene/lxsameer) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-05-04 14:42:42 +0200tremon(~tremon@83.80.159.219) tremon
2025-05-04 14:41:12 +0200haskellbridgehellwolf go doing something relax too. enjoy your sunday folks
2025-05-04 14:40:46 +0200 <[exa]> tomsmeding: np enjoy the sunday :D
2025-05-04 14:40:28 +0200 <haskellbridge> <hellwolf> I know what you mean. But I will not be so quick to judge.
2025-05-04 14:40:10 +0200 <tomsmeding> *sorry
2025-05-04 14:40:05 +0200tomsmedingis afk for a while, sory
2025-05-04 14:39:53 +0200 <[exa]> hellwolf: I'd classify as scam tbh
2025-05-04 14:39:45 +0200ljdarj(~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj
2025-05-04 14:39:28 +0200 <haskellbridge> <hellwolf> - bias of selling before confirmed result.
2025-05-04 14:39:17 +0200 <tomsmeding> I see
2025-05-04 14:39:01 +0200 <tomsmeding> and that sounds limited, but if you want something more than can be expressed to an engine like that, things become very hard, very undecidable, very quickly
2025-05-04 14:38:52 +0200 <[exa]> tomsmeding: the issue is that my "instructions" won't very "simple" (usually multiple effects tied together), so just going the syntax way ("forth is instructions!") is going to be brutally bad
2025-05-04 14:38:41 +0200 <haskellbridge> <hellwolf> https://x.com/VictorTaelin he is the frontman doing it. There is this VC vibe thing: so, there is sometimes selling before confirmation bias, but there are some interesting bits from time to time. I don't fully follow, tbh
2025-05-04 14:38:18 +0200 <tomsmeding> and I mean, coding up a simple engine that tries to deduce a sequent from given ones with BFS isn't too hrad
2025-05-04 14:37:20 +0200 <tomsmeding> [exa]: oh that definitely sounds like program synthesis :p
2025-05-04 14:36:52 +0200 <[exa]> hellwolf: what's hvm and neogen? (googling leads to either twiddler or spam, which is sus)
2025-05-04 14:35:31 +0200 <[exa]> and yeah well it's actually prolog. I want to write constraints on what holds "before" and should hold "after" the program, and the thing would ideally fill in some "middle" so that the "after" is satisfied.
2025-05-04 14:35:19 +0200 <haskellbridge> <hellwolf> I think the hvm person is doing this entire neogen thing, banking on LLM model.
2025-05-04 14:32:31 +0200 <[exa]> tomsmeding: I've just started reading up on the whole topic. Looks like I wanted more of a program synthesis. :D
2025-05-04 14:31:23 +0200 <[exa]> hellwolf: if the heuristic is "there was more chat about it on the internet", it's going great.