2025/05/04

Newest at the top

2025-05-04 19:11:39 +0200econo_(uid147250@id-147250.tinside.irccloud.com)
2025-05-04 19:09:46 +0200tromp(~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:25b8:e34c:8097:c1c7)
2025-05-04 19:08:10 +0200Sgeo(~Sgeo@user/sgeo) Sgeo
2025-05-04 19:08:06 +0200tromp(~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:25b8:e34c:8097:c1c7) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2025-05-04 19:07:37 +0200 <hellwolf> actually, sometimes I see the "expected" and "actual" words, sometimes I don't.
2025-05-04 19:07:20 +0200 <hellwolf> since when
2025-05-04 19:07:05 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@ip4d17f82f.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de)
2025-05-04 19:07:00 +0200 <lambdabot> • In the expression: ()
2025-05-04 19:07:00 +0200 <lambdabot> • Couldn't match expected type ‘Bool’ with actual type ‘()’
2025-05-04 19:07:00 +0200 <lambdabot> error:
2025-05-04 19:06:59 +0200 <int-e> > let False = () in ()
2025-05-04 19:06:47 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-131-173.176.6.pool.telefonica.de) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-05-04 19:06:41 +0200 <int-e> ah no
2025-05-04 19:06:29 +0200 <lambdabot> • In the expression: b
2025-05-04 19:06:29 +0200 <lambdabot> • Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type: a ~ (a, b)
2025-05-04 19:06:29 +0200 <lambdabot> error:
2025-05-04 19:06:27 +0200 <int-e> > let b = (b,b) in ()
2025-05-04 19:06:06 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-131-173.176.6.pool.telefonica.de)
2025-05-04 19:05:39 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@77.23.248.47) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-05-04 19:04:00 +0200 <hellwolf> I always have trouble reading this sentence: Which one was expected, and which one was actual?
2025-05-04 19:04:00 +0200 <hellwolf> | Couldn't match type ‘BOOL’ with ‘(BOOL, b10)’
2025-05-04 19:03:45 +0200acidjnk_new3(~acidjnk@p200300d6e71c4f524d98fe298d45bbdf.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
2025-05-04 19:03:28 +0200peterbecich(~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) peterbecich
2025-05-04 19:00:52 +0200ystael(~ystael@user/ystael) ystael
2025-05-04 18:59:31 +0200Guest70(~Guest80@82.153.135.43) (Client Quit)
2025-05-04 18:58:47 +0200ttybitnik(~ttybitnik@user/wolper) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-05-04 18:58:01 +0200Guest70(~Guest80@82.153.135.43)
2025-05-04 18:57:29 +0200ljdarj(~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2025-05-04 18:56:03 +0200tzh(~tzh@c-76-115-131-146.hsd1.or.comcast.net)
2025-05-04 18:55:19 +0200Arpad(~Arpad@2a02:ab88:38d:4700::b0d5)
2025-05-04 18:46:44 +0200euphores(~SASL_euph@user/euphores) euphores
2025-05-04 18:43:44 +0200ChaiTRex(~ChaiTRex@user/chaitrex) ChaiTRex
2025-05-04 18:42:23 +0200__jmcantrell__(~weechat@user/jmcantrell) jmcantrell
2025-05-04 18:42:19 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@77.23.248.47)
2025-05-04 18:42:12 +0200ChaiTRex(~ChaiTRex@user/chaitrex) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2025-05-04 18:41:39 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@77.23.248.47) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-05-04 18:40:05 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@77.23.248.47)
2025-05-04 18:39:47 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-131-173.176.6.pool.telefonica.de) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-05-04 18:38:33 +0200 <EvanR> I'm ok if Data.Map's implementation is packed with esoteric constants and jiggery pokery if it means more performance and I never have to mess with it xD
2025-05-04 18:35:22 +0200euphores(~SASL_euph@user/euphores) (Quit: Leaving.)
2025-05-04 18:29:13 +0200 <geekosaur> and, uh, look at the implementation. they're usually pretty expensive. I mean, even a list zipper turns one list into two plus a lot of pushing and popping
2025-05-04 18:27:58 +0200 <Pozyomka> Wow, and there's magical constants in the code too...
2025-05-04 18:27:03 +0200 <int-e> that said, yes, zippers are heavy machinery in the sense that they tend to require a lot of code for non-trivial data structures
2025-05-04 18:26:36 +0200 <int-e> and as far as I can tell, that was introduced just for the benefit of alterF
2025-05-04 18:26:21 +0200 <Pozyomka> Wow, that's just... bonkers.
2025-05-04 18:25:44 +0200 <int-e> it remembers a path in a bit mask
2025-05-04 18:25:23 +0200 <int-e> Pozyomka: there's no zipper
2025-05-04 18:20:50 +0200j1n37(~j1n37@user/j1n37) j1n37
2025-05-04 18:19:23 +0200 <Pozyomka> int-e: “pretty heavy machinery” -- Are zippers heavy machinery now?
2025-05-04 18:18:42 +0200CiaoSen(~Jura@2a02:8071:64e1:da0:5a47:caff:fe78:33db) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)