2025/02/09

Newest at the top

2025-02-09 01:49:58 +0100stiell(~stiell@gateway/tor-sasl/stiell) stiell
2025-02-09 01:47:53 +0100sprotte24(~sprotte24@p200300d16f1e3a00501959556750eb7a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Quit: Leaving)
2025-02-09 01:47:24 +0100ljdarj1(~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj
2025-02-09 01:47:00 +0100stiell(~stiell@gateway/tor-sasl/stiell) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2025-02-09 01:44:34 +0100Square3(~Square@user/square) Square
2025-02-09 01:44:32 +0100Square2(~Square@user/square) Square
2025-02-09 01:44:24 +0100aaronv(~aaronv@user/aaronv) aaronv
2025-02-09 01:43:56 +0100yegorc(~yegorc@user/yegorc) yegorc
2025-02-09 01:40:00 +0100alx741(~alx741@186.33.188.229)
2025-02-09 01:37:29 +0100L29Ah(~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah) L29Ah
2025-02-09 01:36:05 +0100zerozwro
2025-02-09 01:25:14 +0100TMA(tma@twin.jikos.cz) TMA
2025-02-09 01:21:15 +0100jathan(~jathan@2607:1a00:0:19::2:1dc) jathan
2025-02-09 01:20:33 +0100L29Ah(~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2025-02-09 01:20:20 +0100Maxdamantus(~Maxdamant@user/maxdamantus) Maxdamantus
2025-02-09 01:20:15 +0100otbergsten(~otbergste@user/otbergsten) ()
2025-02-09 01:20:09 +0100mulk(~mulk@pd95141d7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) mulk
2025-02-09 01:19:49 +0100m1dnight(~m1dnight@d8D861908.access.telenet.be) m1dnight
2025-02-09 01:18:07 +0100m1dnight(~m1dnight@d8D861908.access.telenet.be) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2025-02-09 01:18:05 +0100peterbecich(~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2025-02-09 01:17:38 +0100mulk(~mulk@pd95141d7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2025-02-09 01:16:53 +0100TMA(tma@twin.jikos.cz) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2025-02-09 01:13:34 +0100Maxdamantus(~Maxdamant@user/maxdamantus) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-02-09 01:10:28 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-02-09 01:06:09 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee
2025-02-09 01:06:02 +0100jathan(~jathan@69.61.93.38) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2025-02-09 01:06:02 +0100mesaoptimizer0(~mesaoptim@user/PapuaHardyNet) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2025-02-09 00:59:58 +0100 <Leary> Right. I actually understand if people with too much code to review want strict CI to make their life easier, but it should diff with a checked-in record of known/accepted warnings for flexibility.
2025-02-09 00:57:15 +0100m1dnight(~m1dnight@d8D861908.access.telenet.be) m1dnight
2025-02-09 00:56:45 +0100sixfourtwelve(~ethanmorg@82.18.82.103) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
2025-02-09 00:51:55 +0100philopsos(~caecilius@user/philopsos) philopsos
2025-02-09 00:51:34 +0100sixfourtwelve(~ethanmorg@82.18.82.103) sixfourtwelve
2025-02-09 00:50:05 +0100philopsos(~caecilius@user/philopsos) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2025-02-09 00:44:08 +0100 <monochrom> So it just means I should be complaining about the policing system rather than the warning system.
2025-02-09 00:43:19 +0100 <monochrom> That would be a much better stance than mine, if not for the same totalitarian police also instituting "no warning by the time you commit" or even -Wall -Werror.
2025-02-09 00:42:20 +0100hiredman(~hiredman@frontier1.downey.family) hiredman
2025-02-09 00:39:22 +0100 <Leary> If you don't care to heed a warning, you're supposed to ignore or disable it---it is just a /warning/, after all, not an error. Let's not blame x-partial for /wacky dodging/.
2025-02-09 00:38:33 +0100takuan(~takuan@d8D86B601.access.telenet.be) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-02-09 00:33:58 +0100sixfourtwelve(~ethanmorg@82.18.82.103) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-02-09 00:31:58 +0100benjamin(~benjamin@2a03:4b80:a720:6e10:2961:287b:51c1:b384) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-02-09 00:31:53 +0100benjamin(~benjamin@2a03:4b80:a720:6e10:2961:287b:51c1:b384)
2025-02-09 00:31:34 +0100benjamin(~benjamin@2a03:4b80:a720:6e10:2961:287b:51c1:b384) (Client Quit)
2025-02-09 00:30:58 +0100hiredman(~hiredman@frontier1.downey.family) (Quit: Lost terminal)
2025-02-09 00:29:40 +0100sixfourtwelve(~ethanmorg@82.18.82.103) sixfourtwelve
2025-02-09 00:29:12 +0100Cattykitties
2025-02-09 00:28:24 +0100benjamin(~benjamin@2a03:4b80:a720:6e10:2961:287b:51c1:b384)
2025-02-09 00:22:35 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2025-02-09 00:17:44 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee
2025-02-09 00:14:14 +0100 <monochrom> So a warning system that simply pushes users away from runtime error (undefined) to no error (fix id) is... You know, the road to hell is paved with well intentions.
2025-02-09 00:13:28 +0100 <monochrom> More fairly, on the scale of safety, static error message > runtime error message > no error message