Newest at the top
| 2025-01-20 09:31:05 +0100 | monochrom | (trebla@216.138.220.146) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2025-01-20 09:28:06 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2025-01-20 09:27:41 +0100 | euleritian | (~euleritia@ip4d17fae8.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) |
| 2025-01-20 09:27:22 +0100 | euleritian | (~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-144-251.176.6.pool.telefonica.de) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2025-01-20 09:22:50 +0100 | machinedgod | (~machinedg@d108-173-18-100.abhsia.telus.net) machinedgod |
| 2025-01-20 09:20:06 +0100 | mulk | (~mulk@pd9514590.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2025-01-20 09:19:49 +0100 | caryhartline | (~caryhartl@KD106184157010.ec-userreverse.dion.ne.jp) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2025-01-20 09:19:18 +0100 | <homo> | then try in ghci: sum $ reverse [1..1000000] |
| 2025-01-20 09:18:55 +0100 | <homo> | Bowuigi keep in mind memory manager of hugs is another pain point, try in hugs: sum $ reverse [1..200000] |
| 2025-01-20 09:17:42 +0100 | notzmv | (~umar@user/notzmv) notzmv |
| 2025-01-20 09:17:22 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-01-20 09:15:08 +0100 | kuribas | (~user@ptr-17d51eocedivlwulkvg.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be) kuribas |
| 2025-01-20 09:14:53 +0100 | kuribas | (~user@d51529C17.access.telenet.be) (Quit: ERC 5.5.0.29.1 (IRC client for GNU Emacs 29.3)) |
| 2025-01-20 09:12:44 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2025-01-20 09:12:39 +0100 | monochrom | (trebla@216.138.220.146) |
| 2025-01-20 09:12:27 +0100 | weary-traveler | (~user@user/user363627) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-01-20 09:11:50 +0100 | monochrom | (trebla@216.138.220.146) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) |
| 2025-01-20 09:09:21 +0100 | kuribas | (~user@d51529C17.access.telenet.be) kuribas |
| 2025-01-20 09:06:19 +0100 | caryhartline | (~caryhartl@KD106184157010.ec-userreverse.dion.ne.jp) CaryHartline |
| 2025-01-20 09:05:09 +0100 | Square | (~Square@user/square) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
| 2025-01-20 09:02:31 +0100 | monochrm | monochrom |
| 2025-01-20 09:02:31 +0100 | monochrom | (trebla@216.138.220.146) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
| 2025-01-20 09:01:42 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-01-20 09:01:27 +0100 | paul_j` | (~user@8.190.187.81.in-addr.arpa) |
| 2025-01-20 09:01:24 +0100 | monochrm | (trebla@216.138.220.146) |
| 2025-01-20 09:00:41 +0100 | caconym | (~caconym@user/caconym) caconym |
| 2025-01-20 09:00:29 +0100 | sord937 | (~sord937@gateway/tor-sasl/sord937) sord937 |
| 2025-01-20 09:00:02 +0100 | caconym | (~caconym@user/caconym) (Quit: bye) |
| 2025-01-20 08:56:14 +0100 | alfiee | (alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee |
| 2025-01-20 08:55:49 +0100 | alfiee | (alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
| 2025-01-20 08:53:42 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2025-01-20 08:49:49 +0100 | tromp | (~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl) |
| 2025-01-20 08:48:57 +0100 | <homo> | also is there anyone who tried to run darcs under hugs? |
| 2025-01-20 08:48:14 +0100 | <homo> | I want haskell compiler, not haskell interpreter, and my motivation to modify yacc and c parts of hugs just to get language features I need is almost 0 |
| 2025-01-20 08:46:51 +0100 | tromp | (~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl) (Client Quit) |
| 2025-01-20 08:46:09 +0100 | tromp | (~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl) |
| 2025-01-20 08:44:15 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <Bowuigi> For a scripting even Hugs is fast enough, do you have a special usecase in mind for GHC? |
| 2025-01-20 08:42:47 +0100 | Square2 | (~Square4@user/square) Square |
| 2025-01-20 08:42:20 +0100 | Square | (~Square@user/square) Square |
| 2025-01-20 08:34:55 +0100 | <homo> | Bowuigi and even impossible, I want to switch to riscv or arm, microhs is easy to boostrap there, but ghc is not |
| 2025-01-20 08:32:50 +0100 | paul_j | (~user@8.190.187.81.in-addr.arpa) |
| 2025-01-20 08:30:19 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <Bowuigi> Well, the bootstrap process has to be made at most once per platform, but still, compiling a ton of GHC versions sounds painful |
| 2025-01-20 08:27:58 +0100 | <homo> | anyway, I have different idea: how about to use hugs ported to plan9 to bootstrap microhs on plan9 to have haskell2010 with 50+ ghc extensions compiler on plan9 |
| 2025-01-20 08:26:48 +0100 | sawilagar | (~sawilagar@user/sawilagar) sawilagar |
| 2025-01-20 08:24:57 +0100 | <homo> | Bowuigi nobody tried even that multistep, it's too much work to adjust source code of any version of ghc |
| 2025-01-20 08:24:15 +0100 | <homo> | the reason to lower requirements is because it only makes sense to use small subset of language to implement whole language |
| 2025-01-20 08:23:52 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <Bowuigi> Ah it's multistep for now, so like microhs -> ghc -> ghc -> ... -> ghc |
| 2025-01-20 08:23:33 +0100 | comerijn | (~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
| 2025-01-20 08:23:11 +0100 | <homo> | nobody tried bootstrapping ghc with microhs |
| 2025-01-20 08:22:57 +0100 | <homo> | it's still preferable that ghc lowers requirements so much that it becomes possible to compile today ghc with ancient ghc, then bootstrap with microhs should be easy |