Newest at the top
| 2024-11-06 02:33:11 +0100 | <monochrom> | IIRC the company is precisely FPComplete. |
| 2024-11-06 02:33:05 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2024-11-06 02:32:19 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> I think in this cartoon, something is missing from the company's offering. We just don't know what it is :) |
| 2024-11-06 02:30:36 +0100 | <monochrom> | https://ro-che.info/ccc/26 |
| 2024-11-06 02:29:18 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> a built in cheaper just works ui could help build the foundation |
| 2024-11-06 02:28:12 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> I have got the VS Code debugger extension working once, and it was so fragile and little known that pretty much no-one else will |
| 2024-11-06 02:26:47 +0100 | xff0x | (~xff0x@fsb6a9491c.tkyc517.ap.nuro.jp) |
| 2024-11-06 02:26:43 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> I promise you this one would |
| 2024-11-06 02:26:29 +0100 | CoolMa7 | (~CoolMa7@ip5f5b8957.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2024-11-06 02:26:26 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> and sometimes a monolithic just works out of box tool is the only thing that'll get used |
| 2024-11-06 02:26:12 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2024-11-06 02:25:51 +0100 | <monochrom> | In practice, that doesn't happen often enough in the Haskell community. Look at how GHCi debugger has not received any further work, and how HLS still doesn't have any debugger. Even the GHCup effort is wearing thin and the guy is complaining: https://discourse.haskell.org/t/priorities-for-upcoming-ghc-releases/9605/60 |
| 2024-11-06 02:25:50 +0100 | postcerebral | (~postcereb@user/postcerebral) (Quit: WeeChat 4.4.2) |
| 2024-11-06 02:25:15 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> or anyway, _a_ way |
| 2024-11-06 02:24:54 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> I could imagine integrating an already-maintained TUI editor (yi ?) could also be the way to improve GHCI's debugger, because a more visual UI is what it needs |
| 2024-11-06 02:24:50 +0100 | <zero> | which wraps it "nicely" |
| 2024-11-06 02:23:51 +0100 | <zero> | foreign-store is hacky. i would be more interested in something like https://hackage.haskell.org/package/rapid-0.1.4/docs/Rapid.html |
| 2024-11-06 02:22:07 +0100 | CoolMa7 | (~CoolMa7@ip5f5b8957.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) CoolMa7 |
| 2024-11-06 02:21:59 +0100 | Tuplanolla | (~Tuplanoll@91-159-69-59.elisa-laajakaista.fi) (Quit: Leaving.) |
| 2024-11-06 02:19:53 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> just saying |
| 2024-11-06 02:19:35 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> dev time doesn't always have to be zero sum in FOSS.. motivated new devs / funders sometimes show up |
| 2024-11-06 02:18:36 +0100 | <monochrom> | In the particular case of GHCi, given that dev time is a zero-sum game, when (not if, it's a certainty) the devs have to choose between improving GHCi's debugger and adding an editor to GHCi, why would anyone want the latter? Isn't debugger a much higher priority? Editors already exist, plentiifully. |
| 2024-11-06 02:18:35 +0100 | <constxd> | but yeah i wouldn't want to implement that and maintain it as a part of a REPL |
| 2024-11-06 02:18:15 +0100 | <constxd> | wouldn't be the end of the world imo if it's "for free" by virtue of being built into libreadline or something |
| 2024-11-06 02:16:53 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> +how it goes |
| 2024-11-06 02:16:33 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> try it out, let us know ? |
| 2024-11-06 02:15:56 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) |
| 2024-11-06 02:15:41 +0100 | <zero> | ooh is this hot reloading? |
| 2024-11-06 02:15:26 +0100 | <monochrom> | Instead, since iPython and iHaskell exist, there is no point duplicating the effort in the basic REPL. |
| 2024-11-06 02:14:37 +0100 | <constxd> | ah |
| 2024-11-06 02:14:29 +0100 | <monochrom> | This is different from iPython and iHaskell. I have no quarrel with them. |
| 2024-11-06 02:13:29 +0100 | <monochrom> | tl;dr the python REPL is now its own editor. |
| 2024-11-06 02:12:57 +0100 | <monochrom> | constxd: This: https://discourse.haskell.org/t/multiline-interpreter-with-editing-of-previous-lines/10551 |
| 2024-11-06 02:12:18 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> https://chrisdone.com/posts/ghci-reload maybe |
| 2024-11-06 02:11:22 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> zero: there has been a blog post or two about a way to save/restore ghci state, by chris done I think |
| 2024-11-06 02:10:50 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2024-11-06 02:10:16 +0100 | <zero> | anyways i just want something like node's repl where it basically saves the session history to a file. i guess i can go edit .ghci_history manually... |
| 2024-11-06 02:09:57 +0100 | L29Ah | (~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah) (Read error: Connection timed out) |
| 2024-11-06 02:08:19 +0100 | Guest7 | (~Guest7@137.79.192.219) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
| 2024-11-06 02:07:59 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <zwro> monochrom: (: https://nbviewer.org/github/gibiansky/IHaskell/blob/master/notebooks/IHaskell.ipynb |
| 2024-11-06 02:06:35 +0100 | Versality | (~Versality@user/Versality) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2024-11-06 02:05:35 +0100 | notzmv | (~daniel@user/notzmv) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2024-11-06 02:04:14 +0100 | <constxd> | what do u mean python absurdity? ipython? |
| 2024-11-06 02:03:31 +0100 | <constxd> | yes i think the actual members of the ISO working groups are essentially volunteers |
| 2024-11-06 02:03:28 +0100 | <monochrom> | zwro: There is no plan to follow Python absurdity and evolve GHCi into its own IDE. |
| 2024-11-06 02:01:40 +0100 | <monochrom> | To the point even Knuth is sufficiently fed up to write an article to complain and advocate everyone to jump ship and start free online journals. |
| 2024-11-06 02:00:03 +0100 | ash3en | (~Thunderbi@2a03:7846:b6eb:101:93ac:a90a:da67:f207) (Quit: ash3en) |
| 2024-11-06 01:59:59 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
| 2024-11-06 01:59:21 +0100 | <monochrom> | Right? I'm taking inspiration from the way academic journals work. The journal publishers get all the money. The editors and the peer reviewers do it all for free. |
| 2024-11-06 01:58:32 +0100 | <monochrom> | I am not even convinced that the authors of the standards are compensated at all. |