| 2024-12-24 00:05:25 +0100 | son0p | (~ff@186.121.98.118) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2024-12-24 00:05:55 +0100 | chexum | (~quassel@gateway/tor-sasl/chexum) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2024-12-24 00:05:56 +0100 | ChaiTRex | (~ChaiTRex@user/chaitrex) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2024-12-24 00:06:01 +0100 | califax | (~califax@user/califx) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2024-12-24 00:06:11 +0100 | chexum | (~quassel@gateway/tor-sasl/chexum) chexum |
| 2024-12-24 00:06:18 +0100 | califax | (~califax@user/califx) califx |
| 2024-12-24 00:06:25 +0100 | ChaiTRex | (~ChaiTRex@user/chaitrex) ChaiTRex |
| 2024-12-24 00:06:37 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2024-12-24 00:09:20 +0100 | esph | (~weechat@user/esph) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2024-12-24 00:10:49 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2024-12-24 00:11:40 +0100 | <hellwolf> | ski, show instance is actually "correct", I am sticking a weird domain where U256 means 256 bits. |
| 2024-12-24 00:11:40 +0100 | <hellwolf> | and thanks for your hint using case of, the TH code is actually quite easy, I have it done: https://play.haskell.org/saved/Hdf3hnIp |
| 2024-12-24 00:12:41 +0100 | <hellwolf> | still feel herculean, but now that I wrote couple of big TH code, it feels rather mechanical |
| 2024-12-24 00:22:00 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2024-12-24 00:28:43 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
| 2024-12-24 00:29:38 +0100 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) peterbecich |
| 2024-12-24 00:39:02 +0100 | gorignak | (~gorignak@user/gorignak) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2024-12-24 00:39:39 +0100 | gorignak | (~gorignak@user/gorignak) gorignak |
| 2024-12-24 00:40:03 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2024-12-24 00:43:07 +0100 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
| 2024-12-24 00:45:03 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
| 2024-12-24 00:46:15 +0100 | sawilagar | (~sawilagar@user/sawilagar) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
| 2024-12-24 00:50:24 +0100 | emmanuelux | (~emmanuelu@user/emmanuelux) emmanuelux |
| 2024-12-24 00:50:49 +0100 | xff0x | (~xff0x@p3704193-ipxg12201sapodori.hokkaido.ocn.ne.jp) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2024-12-24 00:55:17 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2024-12-24 01:00:02 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
| 2024-12-24 01:01:03 +0100 | Sgeo | (~Sgeo@user/sgeo) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2024-12-24 01:03:06 +0100 | Lears | Leary |
| 2024-12-24 01:03:11 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <thirdofmay18081814goya> ski: these comments have suddenly made sense to me, thank you very much again! |
| 2024-12-24 01:03:17 +0100 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) peterbecich |
| 2024-12-24 01:04:21 +0100 | weary-traveler | (~user@user/user363627) user363627 |
| 2024-12-24 01:05:59 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <thirdofmay18081814goya> it suddenly made sense because as I was thinking about FRP, I realized, under the interpretation you give "[] Gamma |- A -> [] Gamma |- [] A" encodes that "[] Gamma" is sequence-independent in allowing the circuit to propagate to the next term, "A" |
| 2024-12-24 01:07:36 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <thirdofmay18081814goya> i.e., that implication provides the semantics for: "it doesn't matter the order in which you evaluate/propagate through this part of the secret, it will yield "A" anyways |
| 2024-12-24 01:07:45 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <thirdofmay18081814goya> * anyways" |
| 2024-12-24 01:08:02 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <thirdofmay18081814goya> of the context*, don't know why I said of the secret |