2026/03/11

Newest at the top

2026-03-11 18:49:06 +0100madresch(~Thunderbi@user/madresch) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2026-03-11 18:48:41 +0100 <tomsmeding> probably
2026-03-11 18:47:54 +0100 <int-e> Anyway, this function is responsible for not adding new pragmas with @let. Which IMHO is the sane thing for lambdabot to do :)
2026-03-11 18:43:30 +0100 <tomsmeding> I like that the hint was a function called "moduleProblems"
2026-03-11 18:42:49 +0100 <int-e> exports live in the first field
2026-03-11 18:42:33 +0100 <int-e> it's misnamed
2026-03-11 18:41:26 +0100 <tomsmeding> in the... exports? Or is that variable just misnamed?
2026-03-11 18:40:50 +0100dolio(~dolio@130.44.140.168) dolio
2026-03-11 18:40:12 +0100 <int-e> tomsmeding: https://github.com/lambdabot/lambdabot/blob/master/lambdabot-haskell-plugins/src/Lambdabot/Plugin/… -- guess where pragmas live (next function after this one has a spoiler)
2026-03-11 18:39:12 +0100 <tomsmeding> the first one, apparently
2026-03-11 18:38:54 +0100 <lambdabot> In the Template Haskell quotation [| 42 |]
2026-03-11 18:38:54 +0100 <lambdabot> Syntax error on [| 42 |]
2026-03-11 18:38:53 +0100 <tomsmeding> > [| 42 |]
2026-03-11 18:38:53 +0100dolio(~dolio@130.44.140.168) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2026-03-11 18:38:40 +0100 <lambdabot> Defined.
2026-03-11 18:38:39 +0100 <int-e> @define {- -}
2026-03-11 18:38:34 +0100 <int-e> tomsmeding: sure, but which one of these is the lie?
2026-03-11 18:37:44 +0100wootehfoot(~wootehfoo@user/wootehfoot) (Remote host closed the connection)
2026-03-11 18:36:48 +0100wootehfoot(~wootehfoo@user/wootehfoot) wootehfoot
2026-03-11 18:36:19 +0100wootehfoot(~wootehfoo@user/wootehfoot) (Quit: Leaving)
2026-03-11 18:28:05 +0100 <tomsmeding> lies
2026-03-11 18:28:02 +0100 <lambdabot> Parse failed: TemplateHaskell language extension is not enabled. Please add ...
2026-03-11 18:28:02 +0100 <tomsmeding> @define semantics
2026-03-11 18:27:57 +0100 <lambdabot> Defined.
2026-03-11 18:27:57 +0100 <tomsmeding> @define {-# LANGUAGE TemplateHaskell #-}
2026-03-11 18:27:51 +0100 <lambdabot> Parse failed: Parse error: Haskell
2026-03-11 18:27:51 +0100 <tomsmeding> @define {-# LANGUAGE Template Haskell #-}
2026-03-11 18:27:38 +0100 <mauke> please. please add.
2026-03-11 18:27:16 +0100peterbecich(~Thunderbi@71.84.33.135) peterbecich
2026-03-11 18:27:05 +0100 <tomsmeding> O.o
2026-03-11 18:26:50 +0100 <lambdabot> Parse failed: TemplateHaskell language extension is not enabled. Please add ...
2026-03-11 18:26:50 +0100 <mauke> @define semantics
2026-03-11 18:22:26 +0100 <EvanR> ^
2026-03-11 18:22:23 +0100 <lambdabot> Undefined.
2026-03-11 18:22:23 +0100 <tomsmeding> @undefine
2026-03-11 18:22:08 +0100 <EvanR> I hereby undefined everything
2026-03-11 18:21:51 +0100 <EvanR> nothing means anything, your words actually don't mean what you said, etc xD
2026-03-11 18:21:08 +0100 <EvanR> given how unsemantical most programming languages are I find it hilarious how hard some people want to claim haskell has no semantics either
2026-03-11 18:20:28 +0100euphores(~SASL_euph@user/euphores) euphores
2026-03-11 18:17:11 +0100 <haskellbridge> <ijouw> I quite like that style.
2026-03-11 18:15:06 +0100 <tomsmeding> gentauro: you might try `_ <&> \case _` too
2026-03-11 18:13:15 +0100prdak(~Thunderbi@user/prdak) (Quit: prdak)
2026-03-11 18:10:55 +0100 <gentauro> `LambdaCase` are nice when you work with Functors, as in `( \case …) <$> …`
2026-03-11 18:10:49 +0100euphores(~SASL_euph@user/euphores) (Quit: Leaving.)
2026-03-11 18:03:08 +0100merijn(~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2026-03-11 18:00:42 +0100kuribas(~user@2a02-1810-2825-6000-4935-dc75-5b6f-4493.ip6.access.telenet.be) (Remote host closed the connection)
2026-03-11 18:00:20 +0100pavonia(~user@user/siracusa) (Quit: Bye!)
2026-03-11 17:59:54 +0100tzh(~tzh@c-76-115-131-146.hsd1.or.comcast.net)
2026-03-11 17:58:58 +0100 <tomsmeding> mail to what address? I only have an IP :p
2026-03-11 17:56:27 +0100 <EvanR> see if you can mail him a zipdrive with the whole log on it