2026/02/23

Newest at the top

2026-02-23 22:32:23 +0100 <tomsmeding> nope, unfortunately
2026-02-23 22:31:44 +0100ljdarj(~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj
2026-02-23 22:30:26 +0100morj(~morj@user/morj) (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
2026-02-23 22:29:28 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-02-23 22:28:06 +0100ljdarj(~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2026-02-23 22:28:04 +0100 <EvanR> I was hoping he was going to show some haskell wats
2026-02-23 22:26:14 +0100tromp(~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:1a7:fa86:12e2:7e3d)
2026-02-23 22:25:24 +0100 <tomsmeding> EvanR: how does it feel
2026-02-23 22:22:12 +0100mmaruseacph2(~mihai@mihai.page) mmaruseacph2
2026-02-23 22:21:57 +0100mmaruseacph2(~mihai@mihai.page) (Server closed connection)
2026-02-23 22:21:10 +0100target_i(~target_i@user/target-i/x-6023099) target_i
2026-02-23 22:19:31 +0100target_i(~target_i@user/target-i/x-6023099) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2026-02-23 22:16:11 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2026-02-23 22:14:56 +0100sp1ff(~user@2601:1c2:4701:7850::8cd) sp1ff
2026-02-23 22:12:58 +0100Sgeo(~Sgeo@user/sgeo) Sgeo
2026-02-23 22:11:38 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-02-23 22:11:17 +0100petrichor(~jez@user/petrichor) (Quit: ZNC 1.10.1 - https://znc.in)
2026-02-23 22:06:32 +0100AlexZenon(~alzenon@178.34.151.130)
2026-02-23 22:06:12 +0100distopico(~cerdolibr@xvm-111-150.dc2.ghst.net) distopico
2026-02-23 22:05:58 +0100constxd(~constxd@user/constxd) constxd
2026-02-23 22:05:57 +0100distopico(~cerdolibr@2001:4b98:dc2:41:216:3eff:fe6c:52a1) (Server closed connection)
2026-02-23 22:05:49 +0100 <EvanR> which might still be unenlightened dependent on precision
2026-02-23 22:05:29 +0100 <EvanR> I was unenlightened but now I'm unenlightened minus that bit of enlightenment
2026-02-23 22:04:06 +0100constxd(~constxd@user/constxd) (Server closed connection)
2026-02-23 22:02:38 +0100AlexZenon(~alzenon@178.34.151.130) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
2026-02-23 22:00:55 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2026-02-23 21:59:43 +0100 <tomsmeding> the imagery in the video is appropriate
2026-02-23 21:59:28 +0100 <[exa]> I like how 3:24 looks like a bible reference
2026-02-23 21:59:12 +0100 <tomsmeding> (for the unenlightened: the "batman" is a reference to https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat 3:24)
2026-02-23 21:58:56 +0100petrichor(~jez@user/petrichor) petrichor
2026-02-23 21:57:58 +0100 <EvanR> ha
2026-02-23 21:57:55 +0100 <newmind> EvanR: is the punchline segfault or illegal operation?
2026-02-23 21:57:38 +0100 <tomsmeding> and the story yielded an infinite stream of indivisible batman?
2026-02-23 21:57:01 +0100 <EvanR> bottom, NaN, and prime 1 walk into a bar
2026-02-23 21:56:16 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-02-23 21:55:11 +0100 <tomsmeding> that's a good way to annoy mathematicians
2026-02-23 21:54:44 +0100 <tomsmeding> nice!
2026-02-23 21:54:41 +0100 <[exa]> yes
2026-02-23 21:54:30 +0100 <tomsmeding> what, 1 and 2?
2026-02-23 21:54:26 +0100 <[exa]> man I got hated
2026-02-23 21:54:17 +0100 <[exa]> I once called these "degenerate" primes in front of both abstract&linear algebra folks at once
2026-02-23 21:54:14 +0100 <tomsmeding> "an odd prime p" is not even really shorter than "a prime p ≥ 3"
2026-02-23 21:53:35 +0100 <EvanR> I get you
2026-02-23 21:53:23 +0100 <EvanR> oh wait
2026-02-23 21:53:18 +0100 <tomsmeding> which I always find a funny phrasing, almost certainly chosen because it's the shortest way to express the intended set
2026-02-23 21:53:11 +0100 <EvanR> given an odd non-1 prime...
2026-02-23 21:52:49 +0100 <tomsmeding> there's plenty of math that assumes odd primes
2026-02-23 21:52:33 +0100 <EvanR> so you don't have to preface everything you say about primes with "assuming no 1s"
2026-02-23 21:51:44 +0100 <lambdabot> Infinity
2026-02-23 21:51:42 +0100 <humasect> > (1 / 0)