2026/02/19

Newest at the top

2026-02-19 11:14:47 +0100 <gentauro> which makes sense
2026-02-19 11:14:41 +0100 <gentauro> merijn: and Safe-Haskell -> https://old.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/kbayi9/is_safe_haskell_still_being_developed/gffxtai/
2026-02-19 11:14:18 +0100 <merijn> Whereas yahb is a sandboxed ghci session
2026-02-19 11:14:01 +0100 <merijn> gentauro: lambdabot is using the mueval library
2026-02-19 11:13:42 +0100 <gentauro> «… there is a bot called yahb which runs your request in an actual GHCi prompt»
2026-02-19 11:13:23 +0100 <gentauro> https://wiki.haskell.org/IRC_channel#Bots
2026-02-19 11:13:19 +0100 <[exa]> depends on how you look at it
2026-02-19 11:13:14 +0100 <lambdabot> Num a => a
2026-02-19 11:13:13 +0100 <[exa]> :t 42
2026-02-19 11:12:44 +0100 <gentauro> so lambdabot is not wrapping `ghci` right?
2026-02-19 11:12:20 +0100 <lambdabot> [1]
2026-02-19 11:12:19 +0100 <gentauro> > [1]
2026-02-19 11:12:01 +0100 <lambdabot> <hint>:1:1: error: parse error on input `:'
2026-02-19 11:12:00 +0100 <gentauro> > :t 42
2026-02-19 11:11:54 +0100 <yahb2> 42 :: Num a => a
2026-02-19 11:11:54 +0100 <gentauro> % :t 42
2026-02-19 11:09:44 +0100 <[exa]> looks like they are the only voiced nicks here, together with dr haskellbridge
2026-02-19 11:09:04 +0100 <merijn> I think it's pretty much just lambdabot and yahb, yeah
2026-02-19 11:08:59 +0100 <[exa]> ( oh I mean yahb2 )
2026-02-19 11:07:34 +0100 <[exa]> as you command! lambdabot, yahb
2026-02-19 11:05:54 +0100 <gentauro> what are the name of the bots here in this channel? Is there a command to invoke a list of them :)
2026-02-19 10:59:14 +0100arandombit(~arandombi@user/arandombit) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2026-02-19 10:56:32 +0100Googulator72Googulator
2026-02-19 10:56:29 +0100xff0x(~xff0x@fsb6a9491c.tkyc517.ap.nuro.jp)
2026-02-19 10:55:46 +0100tromp(~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:d9a6:1966:8883:20ad)
2026-02-19 10:54:10 +0100mangoiv(~mangoiv@user/mangoiv) mangoiv
2026-02-19 10:54:10 +0100mangoiv(~mangoiv@2a01:4f9:c012:6c0e::) (Changing host)
2026-02-19 10:54:05 +0100arandombit(~arandombi@user/arandombit) arandombit
2026-02-19 10:53:14 +0100xff0x(~xff0x@fsb6a9491c.tkyc517.ap.nuro.jp) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2026-02-19 10:53:06 +0100mangoiv(~mangoiv@2a01:4f9:c012:6c0e::)
2026-02-19 10:52:51 +0100mangoiv(~mangoiv@user/mangoiv) (Server closed connection)
2026-02-19 10:52:29 +0100tromp(~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:d9a6:1966:8883:20ad) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2026-02-19 10:49:01 +0100fp(~Thunderbi@2001:708:20:1406::10c5) fp
2026-02-19 10:47:11 +0100vanishingideal(~vanishing@user/vanishingideal) vanishingideal
2026-02-19 10:46:47 +0100 <chromoblob> well, i was joking
2026-02-19 10:40:39 +0100 <gentauro> jackdk: and sshine -> https://github.com/sdiehl/wiwinwlh/tree/master and https://sdiehl.github.io/wiwinwlh/ ;)
2026-02-19 10:38:48 +0100paddymahoney(~paddymaho@pool-99-250-10-137.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
2026-02-19 10:38:30 +0100Googulator72(~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-499d-1c5a-0e4b-5795-d7e3.pool6.digikabel.hu)
2026-02-19 10:38:16 +0100chele(~chele@user/chele) chele
2026-02-19 10:38:11 +0100Googulator72(~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-499d-1c5a-0e4b-5795-d7e3.pool6.digikabel.hu) (Quit: Client closed)
2026-02-19 10:35:38 +0100anpad(~pandeyan@user/anpad) anpad
2026-02-19 10:34:55 +0100humasect(~humasect@dyn-192-249-132-90.nexicom.net) (Remote host closed the connection)
2026-02-19 10:34:51 +0100anpad(~pandeyan@user/anpad) (Server closed connection)
2026-02-19 10:32:21 +0100oskarw(~user@user/oskarw) oskarw
2026-02-19 10:31:37 +0100 <int-e> So, sure, we *could* do that, and there's a related thing in EmptyCase, but I strongly disagree that we should.
2026-02-19 10:30:58 +0100 <int-e> The compiler error that a declaration has no corresponding definition is practically useful though. And note that the declaration doesn't have to be next to the definition, so depending on coding style this won't be immediately obvious.
2026-02-19 10:29:01 +0100fp(~Thunderbi@130.233.70.214) (Ping timeout: 267 seconds)
2026-02-19 10:28:08 +0100 <chromoblob> when extension...
2026-02-19 10:27:46 +0100 <chromoblob> it occured to me now that we should allow function definitions with no equations, which when called simply return "non-exhaustive patterns" error
2026-02-19 10:27:29 +0100arandombit(~arandombi@user/arandombit) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)