Newest at the top
| 2026-02-07 16:22:08 +0100 | trickard | (~trickard@cpe-61-98-47-163.wireline.com.au) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2026-02-07 16:21:58 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 255 seconds) |
| 2026-02-07 16:21:24 +0100 | emmanuelux | (~em@user/emmanuelux) emmanuelux |
| 2026-02-07 16:17:55 +0100 | emmanuelux | (~em@user/emmanuelux) (Client Quit) |
| 2026-02-07 16:16:55 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2026-02-07 16:16:15 +0100 | emmanuelux | (~em@user/emmanuelux) emmanuelux |
| 2026-02-07 16:13:25 +0100 | trickard | (~trickard@cpe-61-98-47-163.wireline.com.au) |
| 2026-02-07 16:12:38 +0100 | trickard | (~trickard@cpe-61-98-47-163.wireline.com.au) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2026-02-07 16:09:48 +0100 | oskarw | (~user@user/oskarw) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
| 2026-02-07 16:08:49 +0100 | oskarw` | (~user@user/oskarw) oskarw |
| 2026-02-07 16:06:04 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
| 2026-02-07 16:01:09 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2026-02-07 15:55:08 +0100 | <[exa]> | yeah I mean, these are the things that hurt most for long-running haskell |
| 2026-02-07 15:52:06 +0100 | <davean> | a few of them aren't strictly required, in that there are multiple valid evaluations |
| 2026-02-07 15:51:27 +0100 | <davean> | They're just people missusing the features |
| 2026-02-07 15:51:15 +0100 | <davean> | Those are the features that make haskell work |
| 2026-02-07 15:51:01 +0100 | <davean> | if they don't happen you're not haskell. |
| 2026-02-07 15:50:57 +0100 | <davean> | I mean those aren't mistakes, they're directly requested things to happen |
| 2026-02-07 15:50:25 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
| 2026-02-07 15:50:15 +0100 | <davean> | Oh thsoe should look about the same? |
| 2026-02-07 15:50:03 +0100 | <[exa]> | not an actual leak, more like "unnecessary reference to a megablob doesn't just force itself away" |
| 2026-02-07 15:49:36 +0100 | <[exa]> | these https://wiki.haskell.org/index.php?title=Memory_leak |
| 2026-02-07 15:49:00 +0100 | <davean> | I don't know of any memory leaks with GHC ... |
| 2026-02-07 15:48:50 +0100 | <davean> | Why would there be memory leaks? |
| 2026-02-07 15:48:41 +0100 | <[exa]> | as in, the memory leaks are gonna look completely differently there than in ghc, right :D |
| 2026-02-07 15:48:20 +0100 | <davean> | I was curious! |
| 2026-02-07 15:48:15 +0100 | <davean> | Don't know! Haven't used it! |
| 2026-02-07 15:47:19 +0100 | <[exa]> | yeah good question, how does microhs actually work for longer-running stuff? |
| 2026-02-07 15:45:39 +0100 | juri_ | (~juri@84.19.175.187) juri_ |
| 2026-02-07 15:45:22 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2026-02-07 15:43:23 +0100 | <davean> | ah so it runs once. |
| 2026-02-07 15:41:54 +0100 | aha-engine | (~aha-engin@85-220-13-76.dsl.dynamic.simnet.is) (Quit: aha-engine) |
| 2026-02-07 15:41:49 +0100 | <[exa]> | davean: commandline thingy for generating scripts that then manage some other stuff |
| 2026-02-07 15:39:37 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
| 2026-02-07 15:38:39 +0100 | Buliarous | (~gypsydang@46.232.210.139) Buliarous |
| 2026-02-07 15:37:38 +0100 | <davean> | I'm glad you were able to get haskell to run on it - what are you using haskell for on it? |
| 2026-02-07 15:34:06 +0100 | nschoe | (~nschoe@82-65-202-30.subs.proxad.net) nschoe |
| 2026-02-07 15:33:57 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2026-02-07 15:33:48 +0100 | nschoe | (~nschoe@2a01:e0a:8e:a190:9ee1:e472:fae2:1b2f) (Quit: ZNC 1.8.2 - https://znc.in) |
| 2026-02-07 15:33:26 +0100 | <davean> | Back when you were getting your device I was moving everything to 10GbE though! |
| 2026-02-07 15:32:00 +0100 | <davean> | Before that its mostly just faster means less time talking, means less collisions |
| 2026-02-07 15:31:37 +0100 | <davean> | Wifi 6E is where things get a lot better |
| 2026-02-07 15:30:40 +0100 | <davean> | Which is fine if the radio spectrum is free, and you don't want more |
| 2026-02-07 15:30:28 +0100 | <davean> | So like the 100Mbps ethernet on that would probably be 1/4th of what the wifi its self can handle. |
| 2026-02-07 15:30:16 +0100 | juri_ | (~juri@212.86.45.136) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2026-02-07 15:30:06 +0100 | juri_ | (~juri@212.86.45.136) juri_ |
| 2026-02-07 15:30:00 +0100 | <davean> | 2009 |
| 2026-02-07 15:29:50 +0100 | <[exa]> | yeah like, the 802.11n is from 2010-ish no? |
| 2026-02-07 15:29:14 +0100 | <davean> | in real world conditions |
| 2026-02-07 15:29:09 +0100 | <davean> | even 2009 era wifi moves more than 100Mbps |