2025/11/19

Newest at the top

2025-11-19 18:14:43 +0100spew(~spew@user/spew) (Quit: WeeChat 4.6.3)
2025-11-19 18:14:38 +0100sindu(~sindu@2.148.32.207.tmi.telenormobil.no)
2025-11-19 18:06:38 +0100spew(~spew@user/spew) spew
2025-11-19 18:03:21 +0100humasect(~humasect@dyn-192-249-132-90.nexicom.net) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-11-19 17:59:53 +0100tzh(~tzh@c-76-115-131-146.hsd1.or.comcast.net) tzh
2025-11-19 17:57:57 +0100_bo(~bo@98.red-83-56-255.dynamicip.rima-tde.net) (Leaving)
2025-11-19 17:52:56 +0100EvanR(~EvanR@user/evanr) EvanR
2025-11-19 17:52:36 +0100EvanR(~EvanR@2600:1700:ba69:10:40ed:456a:b2ec:28ad) (Quit: Leaving)
2025-11-19 17:51:13 +0100 <EvanR> MVar or TMVar*
2025-11-19 17:50:57 +0100 <EvanR> which will return the resource to the MVar in case of the thread fails
2025-11-19 17:50:34 +0100 <EvanR> instead of basic locking, consider holding the exclusive resource in an MVar or TVar and accessing it using an appropriate bracket
2025-11-19 17:48:02 +0100 <pie_> meanwhile im sitting here intimidated by basic locking
2025-11-19 17:42:40 +0100trickard_(~trickard@cpe-62-98-47-163.wireline.com.au)
2025-11-19 17:39:49 +0100trickard_(~trickard@cpe-62-98-47-163.wireline.com.au) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-11-19 17:38:57 +0100_bo(~bo@98.red-83-56-255.dynamicip.rima-tde.net)
2025-11-19 17:31:30 +0100lucabtz(~lucabtz@user/lucabtz) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-11-19 17:30:19 +0100Lord_of_Life_Lord_of_Life
2025-11-19 17:30:01 +0100Lord_of_Life(~Lord@user/lord-of-life/x-2819915) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2025-11-19 17:29:28 +0100merijn(~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2025-11-19 17:28:57 +0100Lord_of_Life_(~Lord@user/lord-of-life/x-2819915) Lord_of_Life
2025-11-19 17:21:41 +0100humasect(~humasect@dyn-192-249-132-90.nexicom.net) humasect
2025-11-19 17:14:57 +0100chele(~chele@user/chele) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-11-19 17:09:03 +0100synchromesh(~john@2406:5a00:2412:2c00:b060:d053:cb8a:93d5) synchromesh
2025-11-19 17:07:50 +0100synchromesh(~john@2406:5a00:2412:2c00:b060:d053:cb8a:93d5) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-11-19 17:06:07 +0100DetourNetworkUK(~DetourNet@user/DetourNetworkUK) DetourNetworkUK
2025-11-19 17:05:11 +0100DetourNetworkUK(DetourNetw@user/DetourNetworkUK) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-11-19 17:01:46 +0100trickard_(~trickard@cpe-62-98-47-163.wireline.com.au)
2025-11-19 16:59:28 +0100CiaoSen(~Jura@2a02:8071:64e1:da0:5a47:caff:fe78:33db) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2025-11-19 16:57:40 +0100trickard__(~trickard@cpe-62-98-47-163.wireline.com.au) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2025-11-19 16:57:20 +0100tromp(~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:e845:fcad:fefd:4441)
2025-11-19 16:56:58 +0100haritz(~hrtz@user/haritz) haritz
2025-11-19 16:56:58 +0100haritz(~hrtz@140.228.70.141) (Changing host)
2025-11-19 16:56:58 +0100haritz(~hrtz@140.228.70.141)
2025-11-19 16:52:10 +0100CatGPTCatty
2025-11-19 16:49:19 +0100CattyCatGPT
2025-11-19 16:47:12 +0100Square3(~Square@user/square) Square
2025-11-19 16:46:54 +0100X-Scale(~ARM@6.67.114.89.rev.vodafone.pt) X-Scale
2025-11-19 16:34:31 +0100X-Scale(~ARM@6.67.114.89.rev.vodafone.pt) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2025-11-19 16:29:50 +0100chexum(~quassel@gateway/tor-sasl/chexum) chexum
2025-11-19 16:28:29 +0100chexum(~quassel@gateway/tor-sasl/chexum) (Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.)
2025-11-19 16:28:20 +0100pr1sm(~pr1sm@2600:1000:b16f:9264:f8ae:817d:7595:2bb4) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-11-19 16:27:08 +0100tromp(~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:8d4:6354:928b:6095) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2025-11-19 16:18:07 +0100merijn(~merijn@77.242.116.146) merijn
2025-11-19 16:17:04 +0100spew(~spew@user/spew) (Quit: WeeChat 4.6.3)
2025-11-19 16:16:39 +0100pr1sm(~pr1sm@2600:1000:b16f:9264:f8ae:817d:7595:2bb4)
2025-11-19 16:08:53 +0100merijn(~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-11-19 16:01:40 +0100bggd(~bgg@2a01:e0a:819:1510:5811:6b25:6842:9300)
2025-11-19 15:52:12 +0100 <int-e> (I misspoke, that's just what the code looks like; I'm not reconstructing why that works)
2025-11-19 15:51:29 +0100 <lucabtz> i was reading on the wikipedia page about Yoneda's lemma it is related to continuation style programming. someone has a resource on this
2025-11-19 15:51:18 +0100 <tomsmeding> getting precise enough definitions that you can even reason about them properly is hard enough, and I'm not even sure I have the proper ones