Newest at the top
| 2025-10-30 16:37:54 +0100 | <geekosaur> | 21it: around? |
| 2025-10-30 16:36:55 +0100 | CiaoSen | (~Jura@2a02:8071:64e1:da0:5a47:caff:fe78:33db) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
| 2025-10-30 16:36:48 +0100 | <geekosaur> | unless it's somehow related to my being on both sides of the bridge (maybe using the wrong side's member list?) |
| 2025-10-30 16:36:23 +0100 | <geekosaur> | hm, silence suggests Morj didn't get pinged. but they seem to be working in general |
| 2025-10-30 16:35:56 +0100 | Maxdamantus | (~Maxdamant@user/maxdamantus) Maxdamantus |
| 2025-10-30 16:30:37 +0100 | Maxdamantus | (~Maxdamant@user/maxdamantus) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
| 2025-10-30 16:30:34 +0100 | srazkvt | (~sarah@user/srazkvt) (Quit: Konversation terminated!) |
| 2025-10-30 16:25:19 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | (it's three-dots menu on a message -> view source) |
| 2025-10-30 16:24:36 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | TIL |
| 2025-10-30 16:23:40 +0100 | <geekosaur> | "view raw message" |
| 2025-10-30 16:23:35 +0100 | <geekosaur> | you can see this if you look at the original message (don't recall how you do this in Element, it's in the right-click menu in Nheko) |
| 2025-10-30 16:23:17 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | oh _mentions_, yes |
| 2025-10-30 16:23:14 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | oh really? |
| 2025-10-30 16:23:13 +0100 | CiaoSen | (~Jura@2a02:8071:64e1:da0:5a47:caff:fe78:33db) CiaoSen |
| 2025-10-30 16:22:55 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | which is why replies ping you |
| 2025-10-30 16:22:53 +0100 | <geekosaur> | yes, but the client has to send mentions as part of the message |
| 2025-10-30 16:22:45 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | to the point that it's even recognised when it occurs in the header of the quote in the plain-text version of a standard reply! |
| 2025-10-30 16:22:24 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | I think, by default (not sure to what extent that depends on the client being Element), one's nick is recognised on matrix anywhere in a message |
| 2025-10-30 16:22:23 +0100 | <geekosaur> | that one pinged me too |
| 2025-10-30 16:21:54 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | testing for geekosaur |
| 2025-10-30 16:21:47 +0100 | <geekosaur> | Morj: testing |
| 2025-10-30 16:20:50 +0100 | <geekosaur> | although I note that I got pinged Matrix-side by Tom's ping; that may mean it only pings if it's the first thing on the line (which mismatches most but not all IRC clients) |
| 2025-10-30 16:20:36 +0100 | machinedgod | (~machinedg@d75-159-126-101.abhsia.telus.net) machinedgod |
| 2025-10-30 16:17:45 +0100 | CiaoSen | (~Jura@2a02:8071:64e1:da0:5a47:caff:fe78:33db) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-10-30 16:17:39 +0100 | <geekosaur> | it's possible, I update the docker container weekly and heisenbridge has introduced bugs before |
| 2025-10-30 16:16:39 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | geekosaur: ^ |
| 2025-10-30 16:15:00 +0100 | jmcantrell | (~weechat@user/jmcantrell) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
| 2025-10-30 16:08:43 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <Morj> Who is administering the bridge? Since some time ago I don't get @-ed when someone mentions my name on irc, it stays as regular text. I remember it used to work, did something change? |
| 2025-10-30 16:08:16 +0100 | jmcantrell | (~weechat@user/jmcantrell) jmcantrell |
| 2025-10-30 16:00:45 +0100 | Googulator12 | (~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-03fa-9dbb-a0af-2124-a319.pool6.digikabel.hu) (Quit: Client closed) |
| 2025-10-30 16:00:44 +0100 | Googulator69 | (~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-03fa-9dbb-a0af-2124-a319.pool6.digikabel.hu) |
| 2025-10-30 15:57:52 +0100 | catties | (~catties@user/meow/catties) catties |
| 2025-10-30 15:57:32 +0100 | catties | (~catties@user/meow/catties) (Quit: n_n) |
| 2025-10-30 15:48:01 +0100 | Square2 | (~Square4@user/square) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
| 2025-10-30 15:43:25 +0100 | <kuribas> | Or the domain is not software development. The managers understand their domain, but not how to manage a software team. |
| 2025-10-30 15:43:08 +0100 | foo3 | (~Square@user/square) Square |
| 2025-10-30 15:36:00 +0100 | <TMA> | Business/economic school graduates, all of them |
| 2025-10-30 15:35:19 +0100 | <TMA> | I have experienced managers that were proud of their domain incompetence. Not being "tainted" by understanding the domain was a virtue to them. |
| 2025-10-30 15:31:22 +0100 | Googulator70 | (~Googulato@84-236-65-182.pool.digikabel.hu) (Quit: Client closed) |
| 2025-10-30 15:30:55 +0100 | <lortabac> | *competence |
| 2025-10-30 15:30:43 +0100 | Googulator12 | (~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-03fa-9dbb-a0af-2124-a319.pool6.digikabel.hu) |
| 2025-10-30 15:30:28 +0100 | <lortabac> | yes, in my experience a manager with technical competency helps a lot |
| 2025-10-30 15:28:43 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | and perhaps it is that part that most depends on the company, resulting also in lortabac's experience |
| 2025-10-30 15:28:25 +0100 | srazkvt | (~sarah@user/srazkvt) srazkvt |
| 2025-10-30 15:27:00 +0100 | <kuribas> | It least on technical details of the product. |
| 2025-10-30 15:26:45 +0100 | <kuribas> | sadly management are often non-knowledgeable. |
| 2025-10-30 15:24:34 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | what TMA describes fundamentally comes from a non-knowledgeable person being tasked with assessing value |
| 2025-10-30 15:23:58 +0100 | noctux | (~noctux@user/noctux) noctux |
| 2025-10-30 15:23:41 +0100 | <lortabac> | I can tell you from experience that there are companies where quality is recognized and valued |
| 2025-10-30 15:23:23 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | (not sure about that one; that's just annoying) |