2025/09/03

Newest at the top

2025-09-03 21:00:44 +0200caconym747(~caconym@user/caconym) caconym
2025-09-03 21:00:03 +0200caconym747(~caconym@user/caconym) (Quit: bye)
2025-09-03 20:59:27 +0200cherryramatisdev(~cherryram@user/cherryramatisdev) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-09-03 20:58:03 +0200trickard_(~trickard@cpe-51-98-47-163.wireline.com.au)
2025-09-03 20:57:50 +0200trickard(~trickard@cpe-51-98-47-163.wireline.com.au) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-09-03 20:51:29 +0200target_i(~target_i@user/target-i/x-6023099) target_i
2025-09-03 20:49:03 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-09-03 20:48:39 +0200cherryramatisdev(~cherryram@user/cherryramatisdev) cherryramatisdev
2025-09-03 20:48:20 +0200Everything(~Everythin@217.147.163.184) (Quit: leaving)
2025-09-03 20:44:47 +0200Lycurgus(~juan@user/Lycurgus) Lycurgus
2025-09-03 20:41:20 +0200jmcantrell_(~weechat@user/jmcantrell) jmcantrell
2025-09-03 20:37:32 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
2025-09-03 20:35:24 +0200cherryramatisdev(~cherryram@user/cherryramatisdev) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-09-03 20:33:14 +0200 <[exa]> ^ actual reviewer simulation ^
2025-09-03 20:31:29 +0200 <[exa]> Enrico63: oh wait you have very good comments in the longer commit messages, stupid me, sorry :D
2025-09-03 20:30:35 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-09-03 20:29:17 +0200 <[exa]> Enrico63: anyway the PR is open for literal 5 hours now and you got feedback already, I'd say wait a day or so and it's gonna get attention
2025-09-03 20:28:48 +0200cherryramatisdev(~cherryram@user/cherryramatisdev) cherryramatisdev
2025-09-03 20:26:28 +0200 <[exa]> OTOH I have to say that some of the formatting changes there are for a very good reason :D
2025-09-03 20:26:02 +0200 <[exa]> Enrico63: just from the point of the reviewer, could you separate the commits into formatting changes and then actual changes by topic? (not part 1,2,...; these are kinda very anonymous)
2025-09-03 20:25:31 +0200 <chromoblob> you are right
2025-09-03 20:25:21 +0200cherryramatisdev(~cherryram@user/cherryramatisdev) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-09-03 20:25:21 +0200 <[exa]> s/can't/don't want to/ :D
2025-09-03 20:24:56 +0200 <chromoblob> "I can do Haskell but can't do anything other"
2025-09-03 20:24:40 +0200divlamir(~divlamir@user/divlamir) divlamir
2025-09-03 20:24:25 +0200 <[exa]> (otoh don't get demotivated, saying "I can do haskell" helps :D )
2025-09-03 20:24:19 +0200divlamir(~divlamir@user/divlamir) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-09-03 20:23:18 +0200 <__monty__> Fair warning, if your priority is landing a job, focusing on Haskell is probably not the way.
2025-09-03 20:20:34 +0200cherryramatisdev(~cherryram@user/cherryramatisdev) cherryramatisdev
2025-09-03 20:20:27 +0200sprotte24(~sprotte24@p200300d16f10bc004086942b78d8edfa.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
2025-09-03 20:19:12 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
2025-09-03 20:15:41 +0200fp(~Thunderbi@89-27-10-140.bb.dnainternet.fi) (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
2025-09-03 20:13:27 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-09-03 20:07:14 +0200 <Enrico63> And doing open source seems a way to learn, I suppose
2025-09-03 20:06:59 +0200 <Enrico63> I would really be greatful if somebody could help me get that reviewed. Not because the feature is a big deal, but I'm without a job, and I want to get better at Haskell to eventually target some haskell job
2025-09-03 20:06:44 +0200cherryramatisdev(~cherryram@user/cherryramatisdev) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
2025-09-03 20:05:52 +0200 <Enrico63> I've posted the code on https://codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/298044/augment-vi-editing-mode-in-haskeline-by-impl… so you can look at as an alternative to github.
2025-09-03 20:05:52 +0200 <Enrico63> Hi there! I've just created a pull request (https://github.com/haskell/haskeline/pull/207) for some fix to the haskeline library (that mimics the famous readline library), but the repo has no actual maintainer, but simply a custodian, so my PR can't be reviewed by them :(
2025-09-03 20:05:15 +0200jmcantrell_(~weechat@user/jmcantrell) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2025-09-03 20:03:07 +0200Enrico63(~Enrico63@2a0b:e541:10d0:0:9efc:e8ff:fe24:3213) Enrico63
2025-09-03 20:02:16 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
2025-09-03 19:57:03 +0200acidjnk(~acidjnk@p200300d6e7171976182de2090fb12ade.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) acidjnk
2025-09-03 19:55:42 +0200tomboy64(~tomboy64@user/tomboy64) tomboy64
2025-09-03 19:55:28 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-09-03 19:51:56 +0200 <__monty__> *?
2025-09-03 19:51:53 +0200 <__monty__> But it saves pointers whenever you do have a list-like sequence of children, no/
2025-09-03 19:50:52 +0200peterbecich(~Thunderbi@syn-172-222-149-049.res.spectrum.com) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
2025-09-03 19:50:06 +0200fp(~Thunderbi@89-27-10-140.bb.dnainternet.fi) fp
2025-09-03 19:44:38 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
2025-09-03 19:42:10 +0200zarakshR(~Thunderbi@host5-81-134-212.range5-81.btcentralplus.com) zarakshR