Newest at the top
| 2025-07-31 17:26:59 +0200 | d34db33f | (~d34db33f@user/d34db33f) d34db33f |
| 2025-07-31 17:26:45 +0200 | d34db33f | (~d34db33f@user/d34db33f) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
| 2025-07-31 17:26:16 +0200 | <int-e> | (that trust is managed through ghc's -trust flag (and a few others) and also the `ghc-pkg trust` command) |
| 2025-07-31 17:24:27 +0200 | <int-e> | (the user) |
| 2025-07-31 17:24:24 +0200 | <lambdabot> | :) |
| 2025-07-31 17:24:24 +0200 | <int-e> | @bot |
| 2025-07-31 17:24:10 +0200 | <int-e> | eldritchcookie: Yes, I believe this is being deprecated, because it has like 1 user. But no, the module is still unsafe. However, if a Trustworthy module exported by a package that is *trusted* then that module can be imported into a Safe module. |
| 2025-07-31 17:23:39 +0200 | tromp | (~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:b928:de3f:1dfd:983a) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…) |
| 2025-07-31 17:19:38 +0200 | <__monty__> | eldritchcookie: Not an answer but I think SafeHaskell is being deprecated? |
| 2025-07-31 17:16:44 +0200 | caubert | (~caubert@user/caubert) caubert |
| 2025-07-31 17:16:20 +0200 | ubert | (~Thunderbi@178.165.167.35.wireless.dyn.drei.com) ubert |
| 2025-07-31 17:14:43 +0200 | <sshine> | Bowuigi: cool, thanks :) |
| 2025-07-31 17:14:01 +0200 | lortabac | (~lortabac@2a01:e0a:541:b8f0:55ab:e185:7f81:54a4) (Quit: WeeChat 4.5.2) |
| 2025-07-31 17:10:44 +0200 | Frostillicus | (~Frostilli@pool-71-174-119-69.bstnma.fios.verizon.net) |
| 2025-07-31 17:09:14 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <Bowuigi> sshine There's a ton of proposals on indentation-sensitive syntax, see: https://github.com/jumper149/haskeme or https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-119/srfi-119.html (https://readable.sourceforge.io/) or https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-110/srfi-110.html or https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-49/srfi-49.html |
| 2025-07-31 17:09:14 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <eldritchcookie> if i have {-#LANGUAGE Trustyworthy#-} and i call ghc with -xSafe can i import unsafe modules? |
| 2025-07-31 17:03:49 +0200 | caubert | (~caubert@user/caubert) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
| 2025-07-31 17:01:44 +0200 | puke | (~puke@user/puke) (Quit: puke) |
| 2025-07-31 16:58:53 +0200 | caubert | (~caubert@user/caubert) caubert |
| 2025-07-31 16:57:51 +0200 | jespada | (~jespada@r186-48-25-255.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2025-07-31 16:56:30 +0200 | d34db33f | (~d34db33f@user/d34db33f) d34db33f |
| 2025-07-31 16:49:41 +0200 | tabaqui1 | (~tabaqui@167.71.80.236) (Quit: WeeChat 4.5.1) |
| 2025-07-31 16:49:22 +0200 | jmcantrell | (~weechat@user/jmcantrell) jmcantrell |
| 2025-07-31 16:46:43 +0200 | gorignak | (~gorignak@user/gorignak) (Quit: quit) |
| 2025-07-31 16:46:25 +0200 | caubert | (~caubert@user/caubert) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) |
| 2025-07-31 16:44:59 +0200 | tromp | (~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:b928:de3f:1dfd:983a) |
| 2025-07-31 16:43:16 +0200 | Digit | (~user@user/digit) Digit |
| 2025-07-31 16:41:33 +0200 | Digit | Digitteknohippie |
| 2025-07-31 16:37:46 +0200 | CiaoSen | (~Jura@2a02:8071:64e1:da0:5a47:caff:fe78:33db) CiaoSen |
| 2025-07-31 16:36:33 +0200 | gorignak | (~gorignak@user/gorignak) gorignak |
| 2025-07-31 16:36:18 +0200 | gorignak | (~gorignak@user/gorignak) (Quit: quit) |
| 2025-07-31 16:31:48 +0200 | Frostillicus | (~Frostilli@pool-71-174-119-69.bstnma.fios.verizon.net) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2025-07-31 16:29:26 +0200 | Sgeo | (~Sgeo@user/sgeo) Sgeo |
| 2025-07-31 16:26:09 +0200 | <jreicher> | But from a functional point of view, I still hesitate with Lisp. It's kind of nice that the homoiconicity brought first-class functions (accidentally?) to programmers, but by the same token it also brought unlimited mutability. |
| 2025-07-31 16:23:53 +0200 | fp | (~Thunderbi@2001:708:20:1406::10c5) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-07-31 16:21:49 +0200 | Digitteknohippie | Digit |
| 2025-07-31 16:21:36 +0200 | <jreicher> | Lists in haskell use brackets as well, so I'm not sure it's possible to do better...? |
| 2025-07-31 16:20:24 +0200 | jespada | (~jespada@r186-48-25-255.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy) jespada |
| 2025-07-31 16:18:18 +0200 | jespada | (~jespada@2800:a4:23a6:4500:e9b2:a2a:2e38:8f01) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) |
| 2025-07-31 16:17:54 +0200 | Digit | (~user@user/digit) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) |
| 2025-07-31 16:16:47 +0200 | Digitteknohippie | (~user@user/digit) Digit |
| 2025-07-31 16:15:51 +0200 | <sshine> | I'm sold on the concept. |
| 2025-07-31 16:15:20 +0200 | <sshine> | I just wish I could ignore the parentheses. |
| 2025-07-31 16:15:00 +0200 | <jreicher> | IMO that's Lisp |
| 2025-07-31 16:11:59 +0200 | <EvanR> | no syntax + many different things gets nutty |
| 2025-07-31 16:11:29 +0200 | <EvanR> | syntax is nice when different syntax means different things, and uniform syntax means uniform things |
| 2025-07-31 16:08:26 +0200 | trickard_ | trickard |
| 2025-07-31 16:06:14 +0200 | gorignak | (~gorignak@user/gorignak) gorignak |
| 2025-07-31 16:01:18 +0200 | tromp | (~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:b928:de3f:1dfd:983a) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…) |
| 2025-07-31 16:00:21 +0200 | CiaoSen | (~Jura@2a02:8071:64e1:da0:5a47:caff:fe78:33db) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) |