Newest at the top
2025-05-07 01:18:35 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
2025-05-07 01:17:06 +0200 | bdmg_ | (~myJebba@177.138.161.234) |
2025-05-07 01:11:56 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
2025-05-07 01:10:53 +0200 | sprotte24 | (~sprotte24@p200300d16f36aa00202cf2be69d2c7e4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Quit: Leaving) |
2025-05-07 01:10:41 +0200 | j1n37 | (~j1n37@user/j1n37) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
2025-05-07 01:10:36 +0200 | shr\ke | (~shrike@user/shrke:31298) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
2025-05-07 01:10:12 +0200 | j1n37- | (~j1n37@user/j1n37) j1n37 |
2025-05-07 01:07:47 +0200 | <EvanR> | some other thing would have been easier since I wouldn't have to maintain it |
2025-05-07 01:07:16 +0200 | <int-e> | . o O ( meet my haymaker ) |
2025-05-07 01:07:15 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <Liamzee> nope, and that just makes me annoying |
2025-05-07 01:07:11 +0200 | <EvanR> | I keep all my accounts for self employment in sqlite and then came to same conclusion, why? |
2025-05-07 01:06:59 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <Liamzee> If I say "Scanners Live in Vain", would anyone get the reference? |
2025-05-07 01:06:45 +0200 | <EvanR> | the grass is always greener |
2025-05-07 01:06:44 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <Liamzee> advantages of such an approach: simplicity. disadvantages of such an approach: how performant is going straight through the database? how safe is using sqlite instead? |
2025-05-07 01:06:22 +0200 | <monochrom> | Read: My role as a Haskell programmer to maintain that Haskell code is also obsoleted. |
2025-05-07 01:05:34 +0200 | <monochrom> | I have a lot of student marks to process. Various marking platforms give me student marks as CSV. In the past I wrote my own Haskell program with cassava to read, compute, write. But I can see a future where I just use sqlite, in fact even just the sqlite command line. My Haskell program will be obsoleted. |
2025-05-07 01:04:56 +0200 | <int-e> | You could simply not answer inane "what do you think of" questions that are asked without motivation or other direction or context that would confine the scope of the answer. |
2025-05-07 01:04:34 +0200 | sprout | (~sprout@84-80-106-227.fixed.kpn.net) sprout |
2025-05-07 01:04:01 +0200 | <monochrom> | Maybe I should describe one of my use cases. |
2025-05-07 01:03:48 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <Liamzee> too obviously socratic |
2025-05-07 01:03:05 +0200 | <monochrom> | Why to Haskell types? Why not get rid of even that Haskell program, for example? |
2025-05-07 01:03:01 +0200 | sprout | (~sprout@2a02-a448-3a80-0-c61c-b515-5509-58e7.fixed6.kpn.net) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
2025-05-07 01:02:36 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <Liamzee> to Haskell types, I mean, the result of the query |
2025-05-07 01:02:15 +0200 | <monochrom> | Deserialize to what, and who needs it, and why. |
2025-05-07 01:01:50 +0200 | <monochrom> | Why do I still need to deserialize the return types. |
2025-05-07 01:01:36 +0200 | <hellwolf> | what do you mean? |
2025-05-07 01:01:14 +0200 | gentauro | (~gentauro@user/gentauro) gentauro |
2025-05-07 01:01:04 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
2025-05-07 01:01:01 +0200 | vanishingideal | (~vanishing@user/vanishingideal) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
2025-05-07 01:00:48 +0200 | Square | (~Square@user/square) Square |
2025-05-07 01:00:40 +0200 | <monochrom> | Just for the sake of being the devil's advocate: Why? |
2025-05-07 01:00:36 +0200 | <hellwolf> | So, what do you think of quasiquote template haskell based approach? |
2025-05-07 00:59:23 +0200 | Lord_of_Life | (~Lord@user/lord-of-life/x-2819915) Lord_of_Life |
2025-05-07 00:58:52 +0200 | Lord_of_Life | (~Lord@user/lord-of-life/x-2819915) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
2025-05-07 00:58:28 +0200 | Leary | (~Leary@user/Leary/x-0910699) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
2025-05-07 00:57:41 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <Liamzee> you still need to deserialize the return types |
2025-05-07 00:57:35 +0200 | mistivia_ | (~mistivia@user/mistivia) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
2025-05-07 00:57:04 +0200 | mistivia | (~mistivia@user/mistivia) mistivia |
2025-05-07 00:56:09 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
2025-05-07 00:55:17 +0200 | Lears | (~Leary@user/Leary/x-0910699) Leary |
2025-05-07 00:55:16 +0200 | gentauro | (~gentauro@user/gentauro) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) |
2025-05-07 00:53:47 +0200 | <monochrom> | You know, I agree with that post, and take it to its logical conclusion: Just write SQL itself, it is literally 100% better than any encoding of SQL. |
2025-05-07 00:52:31 +0200 | sayurc | (~sayurc@169.150.203.34) sayurc |
2025-05-07 00:50:21 +0200 | drewr | (~drew@user/drewr) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
2025-05-07 00:49:40 +0200 | <hellwolf> | crypto project that has a bro vibe. |
2025-05-07 00:47:55 +0200 | <monochrom> | What is crypto bro? |
2025-05-07 00:46:45 +0200 | hellwolf | feel self-deprecating about being in the crypto again. |
2025-05-07 00:46:24 +0200 | <hellwolf> | there is a crypto bro project called monad. but don't look it up, it might ruin your day. |
2025-05-07 00:46:05 +0200 | <hellwolf> | (though monad is supposed to be an ugly fish) |
2025-05-07 00:45:43 +0200 | <hellwolf> | does it looks like a monad, and quarks like a monad? |