Newest at the top
| 2025-05-05 00:52:27 +0200 | jbalint | (~jbalint@syn-071-090-119-177.res.spectrum.com) |
| 2025-05-05 00:50:49 +0200 | target_i | (~target_i@user/target-i/x-6023099) (Quit: leaving) |
| 2025-05-05 00:34:44 +0200 | hiredman | (~hiredman@frontier1.downey.family) hiredman |
| 2025-05-05 00:31:10 +0200 | sm | (znc@plaintextaccounting/sm) sm |
| 2025-05-05 00:29:31 +0200 | sm | (znc@plaintextaccounting/sm) (Quit: ZNC 1.6.6+deb1ubuntu0.2 - http://znc.in) |
| 2025-05-05 00:23:16 +0200 | JuanDaugherty | (~juan@user/JuanDaugherty) (Quit: praxis.meansofproduction.biz (juan@acm.org)) |
| 2025-05-05 00:18:58 +0200 | L29Ah | (~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah) L29Ah |
| 2025-05-05 00:18:43 +0200 | Typedfern | (~Typedfern@213.red-83-37-26.dynamicip.rima-tde.net) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-05-05 00:08:33 +0200 | Square | (~Square@user/square) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-05-05 00:08:29 +0200 | Square2 | (~Square@user/square) (Client Quit) |
| 2025-05-05 00:07:36 +0200 | Square2 | (~Square@user/square) Square |
| 2025-05-05 00:07:10 +0200 | Square2 | (~Square@user/square) (Quit: Leaving) |
| 2025-05-05 00:06:31 +0200 | L29Ah | (~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah) () |
| 2025-05-05 00:03:55 +0200 | <hellwolf> | the currently one doesn't compose, makes some code duplication. Anyways, perhaps too specific. |
| 2025-05-05 00:03:16 +0200 | <EvanR> | Yultide |
| 2025-05-05 00:02:43 +0200 | <hellwolf> | in contrast, my current YulITE :: YulCat eff a b -> YulCat eff a b -> YulCat eff (BOOL, a) b |
| 2025-05-05 00:00:19 +0200 | <hellwolf> | that becomes the essence of the if-then-else control structure, the codegen will translate that to the target language code, which is rather short. |
| 2025-05-04 23:58:34 +0200 | <hellwolf> | my old ITE didn't use cartesian closed, created duplicated coded. |
| 2025-05-04 23:58:30 +0200 | notdabs | (~Owner@2600:1700:69cf:9000:953a:ffda:3cd1:4a35) () |
| 2025-05-04 23:58:16 +0200 | <hellwolf> | ^-- that constructor reads: give me two morphisms from a ~> b, representing two branches of the if-then-else, I will you give back a new morphism also from a (must be, otherwise doesn't compose) to another morphism (hence closed cartesian) that is BOOL ~> b |
| 2025-05-04 23:58:10 +0200 | notdabs | (~Owner@2600:1700:69cf:9000:953a:ffda:3cd1:4a35) |
| 2025-05-04 23:55:53 +0200 | <hellwolf> | to be continued. |
| 2025-05-04 23:55:49 +0200 | <hellwolf> | I don't need the INT after all, if I can make this type-check |
| 2025-05-04 23:55:40 +0200 | <hellwolf> | thanks for the help |
| 2025-05-04 23:55:38 +0200 | <hellwolf> | that'd be my new constructor to replace old inefficient ITE. |
| 2025-05-04 23:55:20 +0200 | <hellwolf> | YulITE :: YulCat eff a b -> YulCat eff a b -> YulCat eff a (YulCat eff BOOL b) |
| 2025-05-04 23:54:08 +0200 | <hellwolf> | no, that's good. I have different approach here. But I can do a similar thing. |
| 2025-05-04 23:54:03 +0200 | <tomsmeding> | anyway bedtime for me o/ |
| 2025-05-04 23:53:50 +0200 | <tomsmeding> | though usually I do have more types in the language to interpret so that there's actually something to preserve :p |
| 2025-05-04 23:53:27 +0200 | <tomsmeding> | I've written this kind of code too often |
| 2025-05-04 23:53:19 +0200 | <tomsmeding> | apologies for being impatient for a bit there by the way, it's late here |
| 2025-05-04 23:52:22 +0200 | __monty__ | (~toonn@user/toonn) (Quit: leaving) |
| 2025-05-04 23:48:33 +0200 | <tomsmeding> | :') |
| 2025-05-04 23:48:31 +0200 | <tomsmeding> | if you want practice with this particular trick, do assignment 0.3 here https://utrechtuniversity.github.io/infomcpd/assignments/asg0.pdf |
| 2025-05-04 23:47:13 +0200 | <hellwolf> | I am digesting |
| 2025-05-04 23:46:45 +0200 | <EvanR> | see what tomsmeding just did |
| 2025-05-04 23:46:29 +0200 | <EvanR> | doesn't matter what source language |
| 2025-05-04 23:46:11 +0200 | <EvanR> | functions are expressed as functions |
| 2025-05-04 23:45:58 +0200 | <EvanR> | yes this is what higher order abstract syntax does |
| 2025-05-04 23:45:30 +0200 | <hellwolf> | what code? This code snippets is not even Haskell... |
| 2025-05-04 23:45:30 +0200 | <hellwolf> | | there's always a way to convert code into a haskell function |
| 2025-05-04 23:45:29 +0200 | <tomsmeding> | and create that `->` function by partially-applying `go` to the term you wish to store in the Value |
| 2025-05-04 23:45:14 +0200 | <tomsmeding> | alternatively: `data Value = VWord WORD | VFun (Value -> State EvalData Value)` |
| 2025-05-04 23:45:09 +0200 | <hellwolf> | I can't do that in Eval. But let it be, I think I find away. |
| 2025-05-04 23:45:07 +0200 | <EvanR> | there's always a way to convert code into a haskell function |
| 2025-05-04 23:44:59 +0200 | <hellwolf> | I store the snippets and it becomes a function object |
| 2025-05-04 23:44:45 +0200 | <hellwolf> | code snippets is basically what's generated by https://github.com/yolc-dev/yul-dsl-monorepo/blob/master/hs-pkgs/yul-dsl/src/YulDSL/CodeGens/Yul/I… |
| 2025-05-04 23:44:33 +0200 | <tomsmeding> | perhaps `data SomeTerm = forall a b. YulO2 a b => SOmeTerm (YulCat eff a b)` |
| 2025-05-04 23:44:22 +0200 | <EvanR> | if not an AST |
| 2025-05-04 23:44:09 +0200 | <EvanR> | at least your codesnippets are in a more convenient form than blob of Text? At least it's a string of tokens? xD |