Newest at the top
| 2025-05-07 09:46:24 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | okay, now i am in danger of being ad hominen. but i swear i can quote his words |
| 2025-05-07 09:46:24 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <hellwolf> tom is openly a imperative 5th column in haskell republic. |
| 2025-05-07 09:45:25 +0200 | darkstardevx | (~darkstard@50.53.3.2) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-05-07 09:45:05 +0200 | darkstardevx | (~darkstard@50.53.3.2) darkstardevx |
| 2025-05-07 09:43:54 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <Bowuigi> I actually answered, I cite: "Paradigm switches are useful and can make code clearer, but imperative is usually not the best one to switch to lol" |
| 2025-05-07 09:40:52 +0200 | sabathan2 | (~sabathan@amarseille-159-1-12-107.w86-203.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 2025-05-07 09:40:24 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <hellwolf> Oops, it's IRC. And probably my message was squashed in the irc world. |
| 2025-05-07 09:39:31 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | ... long message truncated: https://kf8nh.com/_heisenbridge/media/kf8nh.com/nixvJLeXrGvewcPZQffWwHnL/5n5W18Cg9vc (3 lines) |
| 2025-05-07 09:39:28 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <hellwolf> I guess the idea being sold by tom, if interpolated, is that for_ is at the sweet spot where it addresses /most/ of our iteration needs while being also friendly to people (as a word, or similar to foreach, in other languages). |
| 2025-05-07 09:36:59 +0200 | sabathan2 | (~sabathan@amarseille-159-1-12-107.w86-203.abo.wanadoo.fr) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2025-05-07 09:35:11 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@77.242.116.146) merijn |
| 2025-05-07 09:33:30 +0200 | chele | (~chele@user/chele) chele |
| 2025-05-07 09:28:35 +0200 | sord937 | (~sord937@gateway/tor-sasl/sord937) sord937 |
| 2025-05-07 09:28:14 +0200 | fp | (~Thunderbi@wireless-86-50-140-117.open.aalto.fi) fp |
| 2025-05-07 09:27:48 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <hellwolf> no answer. IRC at its finest. |
| 2025-05-07 09:27:35 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <hellwolf> But this thread is so confusing. So, for_ good or not |
| 2025-05-07 09:26:26 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <hellwolf> I do want to sell Haskell. But I guess I am at the choir at ZuriHac. |
| 2025-05-07 09:26:20 +0200 | ljdarj | (~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj |
| 2025-05-07 09:26:18 +0200 | sajenim | (~sajenim@user/sajenim) (Quit: WeeChat 4.4.3) |
| 2025-05-07 09:24:52 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <hellwolf> :p good to know that we may become friends still. |
| 2025-05-07 09:23:39 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <maerwald> I do have friends who use nix... so there is that xD |
| 2025-05-07 09:22:55 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <hellwolf> maerwald: I will be at ZuriHac. Looking forward to seeing you in person. Not sure I will engage with your nix debate though :p |
| 2025-05-07 09:21:30 +0200 | rvalue- | rvalue |
| 2025-05-07 09:14:53 +0200 | rvalue | (~rvalue@user/rvalue) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2025-05-07 09:14:42 +0200 | rvalue- | (~rvalue@user/rvalue) rvalue |
| 2025-05-07 09:12:54 +0200 | Sgeo | (~Sgeo@user/sgeo) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2025-05-07 09:09:07 +0200 | CiaoSen | (~Jura@2a02:8071:64e1:da0:5a47:caff:fe78:33db) CiaoSen |
| 2025-05-07 09:05:05 +0200 | lortabac | (~lortabac@2a01:e0a:541:b8f0:55ab:e185:7f81:54a4) |
| 2025-05-07 09:01:08 +0200 | acidjnk | (~acidjnk@p200300d6e71c4f51a913f462df63336d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) acidjnk |
| 2025-05-07 09:00:42 +0200 | caconym7 | (~caconym@user/caconym) caconym |
| 2025-05-07 09:00:02 +0200 | caconym7 | (~caconym@user/caconym) (Quit: bye) |
| 2025-05-07 08:56:55 +0200 | tromp | (~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:d43:3b62:1503:cb84) |
| 2025-05-07 08:52:34 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <maerwald> dminuoso: what's your opinion on frp? |
| 2025-05-07 08:51:41 +0200 | mistivia | (~mistivia@user/mistivia) mistivia |
| 2025-05-07 08:51:11 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2025-05-07 08:50:06 +0200 | j1n37 | (~j1n37@user/j1n37) j1n37 |
| 2025-05-07 08:49:25 +0200 | j1n37 | (~j1n37@user/j1n37) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
| 2025-05-07 08:49:17 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <Bowuigi> But I was talking about build systems, not languages :) |
| 2025-05-07 08:48:53 +0200 | mistivia | (~mistivia@user/mistivia) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
| 2025-05-07 08:46:58 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> we all know its badness :) |
| 2025-05-07 08:46:55 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <Bowuigi> At some things, yes |
| 2025-05-07 08:46:25 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-05-07 08:46:23 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <maerwald> So now Haskell is bad? |
| 2025-05-07 08:45:45 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <Bowuigi> Because when something is good, everyone wants to use it for everything, thus making it bad |
| 2025-05-07 08:44:57 +0200 | euleritian | (~euleritia@77.23.248.100) |
| 2025-05-07 08:44:57 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> and also not enough (only one shake file / process per directory) |
| 2025-05-07 08:44:37 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <maerwald> sm: Too powerful, imo |
| 2025-05-07 08:44:28 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> Shake is quite powerful |
| 2025-05-07 08:44:08 +0200 | <dminuoso> | Just to replace them with a different kind of bad. |
| 2025-05-07 08:44:07 +0200 | euleritian | (~euleritia@77.23.248.100) (Remote host closed the connection) |