2025/05/02

Newest at the top

2025-05-02 22:29:01 +0200 <EvanR> it's pure art is what it is
2025-05-02 22:28:56 +0200hellwolfhave no idea what does brainrot mean. I just saw the word lately.
2025-05-02 22:28:38 +0200 <hellwolf> that's brainrot game
2025-05-02 22:26:41 +0200 <hellwolf> dminuoso: makes sense. both are established technology, so that should be less of a contributor. So, the innate property of the technology, the ones you just mentioned for instances, becomes a more important factor here.
2025-05-02 22:25:38 +0200 <haskellbridge> <sm> https://linearity.itch.io/peoplemon eh
2025-05-02 22:24:19 +0200michalz(~michalz@185.246.207.203) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-05-02 22:17:15 +0200peterbecich(~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) peterbecich
2025-05-02 22:15:15 +0200 <EvanR> like critically acclaimed peoplemon
2025-05-02 22:14:39 +0200 <EvanR> there's a lot more on itch.io
2025-05-02 22:13:45 +0200 <dminuoso> With planes you are extremely limited.
2025-05-02 22:13:29 +0200 <dminuoso> Which means at any point in the flight, you can just abort and land where you want, even if both engines go out.
2025-05-02 22:12:41 +0200 <dminuoso> hellwolf: Come to think of it, I suspect the major reason to be the ability to autorotate
2025-05-02 22:11:42 +0200 <haskellbridge> <sm> and https://store.steampowered.com/app/2495130/Pixelpusher is the other
2025-05-02 22:07:48 +0200 <EvanR> defect process, is one
2025-05-02 22:07:35 +0200 <dminuoso> If you make an aircraft, you have these 724,012 things to address to prevent past mistakes.
2025-05-02 22:07:20 +0200 <m15k47on1c> Can you tell me their names?
2025-05-02 22:07:09 +0200 <dminuoso> At the same time, this way of "events lead to changes" is also what makes modern clean sheet designs nearly impossible, and it makes it difficult and expensive for new companies to emerge.
2025-05-02 22:07:01 +0200 <EvanR> (uhg. "steam game")
2025-05-02 22:06:48 +0200 <EvanR> more than 1
2025-05-02 22:06:43 +0200 <EvanR> yes
2025-05-02 22:06:37 +0200Googulator65(~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-4a24-1dc7-297e-fae3-e794.pool6.digikabel.hu)
2025-05-02 22:06:32 +0200 <m15k47on1c> Is there any steam game written in haskell?
2025-05-02 22:06:21 +0200Googulator65(~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-4a24-1dc7-297e-fae3-e794.pool6.digikabel.hu) (Quit: Client closed)
2025-05-02 22:05:35 +0200remedan(~remedan@ip-62-245-108-153.bb.vodafone.cz) remedan
2025-05-02 22:04:52 +0200 <dminuoso> Will get back to you tomorrow on this. :)
2025-05-02 22:04:45 +0200 <EvanR> (used to work for a fake article site company, they're probably loving the AI craze right now)
2025-05-02 22:04:37 +0200 <dminuoso> EvanR: I have some good sources, but Im behind rubbish internet right now.
2025-05-02 22:03:40 +0200 <EvanR> when I try to look up stats, I get obvious AI generated articles
2025-05-02 22:02:45 +0200jcarpenter2(~lol@2603:3016:1e01:b960:740e:a7b5:ac86:87b2)
2025-05-02 22:02:06 +0200 <EvanR> I hope no one hears this and mistakes what you're saying that helicopters are much safer than commercial airliners
2025-05-02 22:02:05 +0200 <dminuoso> With an A320 you need 1.5km of runway...
2025-05-02 22:01:17 +0200 <dminuoso> Sounds plausible. Helicopters - even with engine failure - are still very mobile and need only minimal space for an emergency landing.
2025-05-02 22:01:11 +0200 <hellwolf> pardon my sloppy english: most commercial jet crashes happen during....
2025-05-02 22:00:22 +0200 <hellwolf> in comparison.
2025-05-02 22:00:18 +0200 <hellwolf> It kinda makes intuitive sense. I think most commercial jet crashes during taking off or landing? And helicopter has a much safer landing/taking off procedure?
2025-05-02 21:59:27 +0200 <dminuoso> They are exceedingly safe.
2025-05-02 21:59:13 +0200 <dminuoso> EvanR: Ill dig up some numbers but last I checked helicopters have about 1/10th of the chance for fatal or non-fatal accidents per 100,000 flight hours.
2025-05-02 21:58:59 +0200m15k47on1c(~m15k47on1@user/m15k47on1c) m15k47on1c
2025-05-02 21:55:13 +0200 <dminuoso> It is just that commercial helicopters are rather rare.
2025-05-02 21:54:44 +0200 <dminuoso> Given that its the same regulation bodies, I find the characterization somewhat unlikely
2025-05-02 21:53:22 +0200j1n37(~j1n37@user/j1n37) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-05-02 21:53:00 +0200remedan_(~remedan@ip-62-245-108-153.bb.vodafone.cz) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-05-02 21:52:44 +0200j1n37-(~j1n37@user/j1n37) j1n37
2025-05-02 21:52:37 +0200jespada(~jespada@r179-25-202-180.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy) jespada
2025-05-02 21:51:41 +0200jespada(~jespada@r179-25-202-180.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy) (Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2025-05-02 21:51:30 +0200 <EvanR> people just accept the risk with helicopter flights
2025-05-02 21:50:49 +0200 <dminuoso> What do you mean?
2025-05-02 21:50:44 +0200 <EvanR> accidents keep leading to no changes
2025-05-02 21:50:36 +0200 <EvanR> except helicopters
2025-05-02 21:50:17 +0200michalz(~michalz@185.246.207.203)