Newest at the top
| 2025-05-02 22:15:15 +0200 | <EvanR> | like critically acclaimed peoplemon |
| 2025-05-02 22:14:39 +0200 | <EvanR> | there's a lot more on itch.io |
| 2025-05-02 22:13:45 +0200 | <dminuoso> | With planes you are extremely limited. |
| 2025-05-02 22:13:29 +0200 | <dminuoso> | Which means at any point in the flight, you can just abort and land where you want, even if both engines go out. |
| 2025-05-02 22:12:41 +0200 | <dminuoso> | hellwolf: Come to think of it, I suspect the major reason to be the ability to autorotate |
| 2025-05-02 22:11:42 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> and https://store.steampowered.com/app/2495130/Pixelpusher is the other |
| 2025-05-02 22:07:48 +0200 | <EvanR> | defect process, is one |
| 2025-05-02 22:07:35 +0200 | <dminuoso> | If you make an aircraft, you have these 724,012 things to address to prevent past mistakes. |
| 2025-05-02 22:07:20 +0200 | <m15k47on1c> | Can you tell me their names? |
| 2025-05-02 22:07:09 +0200 | <dminuoso> | At the same time, this way of "events lead to changes" is also what makes modern clean sheet designs nearly impossible, and it makes it difficult and expensive for new companies to emerge. |
| 2025-05-02 22:07:01 +0200 | <EvanR> | (uhg. "steam game") |
| 2025-05-02 22:06:48 +0200 | <EvanR> | more than 1 |
| 2025-05-02 22:06:43 +0200 | <EvanR> | yes |
| 2025-05-02 22:06:37 +0200 | Googulator65 | (~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-4a24-1dc7-297e-fae3-e794.pool6.digikabel.hu) |
| 2025-05-02 22:06:32 +0200 | <m15k47on1c> | Is there any steam game written in haskell? |
| 2025-05-02 22:06:21 +0200 | Googulator65 | (~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-4a24-1dc7-297e-fae3-e794.pool6.digikabel.hu) (Quit: Client closed) |
| 2025-05-02 22:05:35 +0200 | remedan | (~remedan@ip-62-245-108-153.bb.vodafone.cz) remedan |
| 2025-05-02 22:04:52 +0200 | <dminuoso> | Will get back to you tomorrow on this. :) |
| 2025-05-02 22:04:45 +0200 | <EvanR> | (used to work for a fake article site company, they're probably loving the AI craze right now) |
| 2025-05-02 22:04:37 +0200 | <dminuoso> | EvanR: I have some good sources, but Im behind rubbish internet right now. |
| 2025-05-02 22:03:40 +0200 | <EvanR> | when I try to look up stats, I get obvious AI generated articles |
| 2025-05-02 22:02:45 +0200 | jcarpenter2 | (~lol@2603:3016:1e01:b960:740e:a7b5:ac86:87b2) |
| 2025-05-02 22:02:06 +0200 | <EvanR> | I hope no one hears this and mistakes what you're saying that helicopters are much safer than commercial airliners |
| 2025-05-02 22:02:05 +0200 | <dminuoso> | With an A320 you need 1.5km of runway... |
| 2025-05-02 22:01:17 +0200 | <dminuoso> | Sounds plausible. Helicopters - even with engine failure - are still very mobile and need only minimal space for an emergency landing. |
| 2025-05-02 22:01:11 +0200 | <hellwolf> | pardon my sloppy english: most commercial jet crashes happen during.... |
| 2025-05-02 22:00:22 +0200 | <hellwolf> | in comparison. |
| 2025-05-02 22:00:18 +0200 | <hellwolf> | It kinda makes intuitive sense. I think most commercial jet crashes during taking off or landing? And helicopter has a much safer landing/taking off procedure? |
| 2025-05-02 21:59:27 +0200 | <dminuoso> | They are exceedingly safe. |
| 2025-05-02 21:59:13 +0200 | <dminuoso> | EvanR: Ill dig up some numbers but last I checked helicopters have about 1/10th of the chance for fatal or non-fatal accidents per 100,000 flight hours. |
| 2025-05-02 21:58:59 +0200 | m15k47on1c | (~m15k47on1@user/m15k47on1c) m15k47on1c |
| 2025-05-02 21:55:13 +0200 | <dminuoso> | It is just that commercial helicopters are rather rare. |
| 2025-05-02 21:54:44 +0200 | <dminuoso> | Given that its the same regulation bodies, I find the characterization somewhat unlikely |
| 2025-05-02 21:53:22 +0200 | j1n37 | (~j1n37@user/j1n37) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-05-02 21:53:00 +0200 | remedan_ | (~remedan@ip-62-245-108-153.bb.vodafone.cz) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-05-02 21:52:44 +0200 | j1n37- | (~j1n37@user/j1n37) j1n37 |
| 2025-05-02 21:52:37 +0200 | jespada | (~jespada@r179-25-202-180.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy) jespada |
| 2025-05-02 21:51:41 +0200 | jespada | (~jespada@r179-25-202-180.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy) (Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…) |
| 2025-05-02 21:51:30 +0200 | <EvanR> | people just accept the risk with helicopter flights |
| 2025-05-02 21:50:49 +0200 | <dminuoso> | What do you mean? |
| 2025-05-02 21:50:44 +0200 | <EvanR> | accidents keep leading to no changes |
| 2025-05-02 21:50:36 +0200 | <EvanR> | except helicopters |
| 2025-05-02 21:50:17 +0200 | michalz | (~michalz@185.246.207.203) |
| 2025-05-02 21:50:10 +0200 | <dminuoso> | But it is not software that enabled it, but the fact that those changes were mandated. |
| 2025-05-02 21:49:58 +0200 | <dminuoso> | In aviation this works because any single incident can and often does lead to mandated (!) changes. |
| 2025-05-02 21:49:09 +0200 | remedan | (~remedan@ip-62-245-108-153.bb.vodafone.cz) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) |
| 2025-05-02 21:48:38 +0200 | <dminuoso> | :-) |
| 2025-05-02 21:48:25 +0200 | <monochrom> | You know, they said that about CPU firmware too... |
| 2025-05-02 21:47:53 +0200 | remedan_ | (~remedan@ip-62-245-108-153.bb.vodafone.cz) remedan |
| 2025-05-02 21:47:42 +0200 | <dminuoso> | I've read opinions comparing the situation to that of aviation, where autonomous driving enables rolling out changes to improve safety across all drivers. |