Newest at the top
| 2025-04-30 23:17:59 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-04-30 23:16:39 +0200 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2025-04-30 23:16:37 +0200 | tromp | (~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:81f6:6a75:5fad:c9b4) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…) |
| 2025-04-30 23:15:27 +0200 | Digitteknohippie | Digit |
| 2025-04-30 23:06:31 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-04-30 23:05:41 +0200 | michalz | (~michalz@185.246.207.201) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
| 2025-04-30 23:00:25 +0200 | Digit | (~user@69.47.7.51.dyn.plus.net) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2025-04-30 22:59:57 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-04-30 22:59:42 +0200 | Digitteknohippie | (~user@69.47.7.51.dyn.plus.net) |
| 2025-04-30 22:57:12 +0200 | bliminse | (~bliminse@user/bliminse) (Quit: leaving) |
| 2025-04-30 22:55:53 +0200 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) peterbecich |
| 2025-04-30 22:54:47 +0200 | Digitteknohippie | Digit |
| 2025-04-30 22:49:22 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) |
| 2025-04-30 22:44:09 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-04-30 22:42:52 +0200 | Digit | (~user@69.47.7.51.dyn.plus.net) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) |
| 2025-04-30 22:41:40 +0200 | <mauke> | but that was too easy |
| 2025-04-30 22:41:31 +0200 | Digitteknohippie | (~user@69.47.7.51.dyn.plus.net) |
| 2025-04-30 22:41:05 +0200 | <mauke> | in my case, I rewrote the interpreter in perl :-) |
| 2025-04-30 22:41:02 +0200 | <monochrom> | heheh |
| 2025-04-30 22:40:57 +0200 | <mauke> | hah |
| 2025-04-30 22:40:43 +0200 | <geekosaur> | I think I used it exactly once. I could argue that it drove me to Haskell 🙂 |
| 2025-04-30 22:40:35 +0200 | <mauke> | but the man page described it wrong, so my code (carefully written against the documentation) didn't work and in the end I had to write my own lookup table from scratch |
| 2025-04-30 22:39:18 +0200 | <mauke> | I remember hsearch specifically because I actually tried to use it once when I was writing my first interpreter |
| 2025-04-30 22:37:48 +0200 | <mauke> | hsearch is not standard C, luckily |
| 2025-04-30 22:35:44 +0200 | <geekosaur> | I woul;d say they'd be stupid to have standardized it, but I think they standardized the System III/V hashtable etc. crap… |
| 2025-04-30 22:34:32 +0200 | <mauke> | if it's not ISO 9899, not at all :-) |
| 2025-04-30 22:33:18 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
| 2025-04-30 22:32:34 +0200 | <geekosaur> | dunno how standard you consider it, but gdbm maintained the ancient interface until a few years ago iirc |
| 2025-04-30 22:31:57 +0200 | <geekosaur> | libdbm used to |
| 2025-04-30 22:31:05 +0200 | <mauke> | I'm not sure if there's any standard C function that passes structs by value outside of div/ldiv |
| 2025-04-30 22:29:59 +0200 | <mauke> | they definitely were there when C was standardized in the 1980s, but none of the older APIs use them |
| 2025-04-30 22:29:14 +0200 | <mauke> | I don't remember if they were implemented by the time K&R was published |
| 2025-04-30 22:28:59 +0200 | <mauke> | pass-by-value structs were not implemented in the very first C compiler |
| 2025-04-30 22:28:22 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-04-30 22:26:43 +0200 | Buliarous | (~gypsydang@46.232.210.139) Buliarous |
| 2025-04-30 22:26:15 +0200 | Buliarou1 | (~gypsydang@46.232.210.139) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-04-30 22:25:06 +0200 | j1n37 | (~j1n37@user/j1n37) j1n37 |
| 2025-04-30 22:21:26 +0200 | j1n37 | (~j1n37@user/j1n37) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2025-04-30 22:20:08 +0200 | j1n37 | (~j1n37@user/j1n37) j1n37 |
| 2025-04-30 22:18:52 +0200 | dolio | (~dolio@130.44.140.168) dolio |
| 2025-04-30 22:17:38 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
| 2025-04-30 22:17:36 +0200 | dolio | (~dolio@130.44.140.168) (Quit: ZNC 1.9.1 - https://znc.in) |
| 2025-04-30 22:17:04 +0200 | Square3 | (~Square@user/square) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
| 2025-04-30 22:16:54 +0200 | j1n37- | (~j1n37@user/j1n37) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2025-04-30 22:16:35 +0200 | <EvanR> | link time optimization aside |
| 2025-04-30 22:16:18 +0200 | <EvanR> | for externally visible callable things I would hope not |
| 2025-04-30 22:14:12 +0200 | Square2 | (~Square4@user/square) Square |
| 2025-04-30 22:13:12 +0200 | <monochrom> | Here is a question I would need to resolve first. Does the calling convention vary by optimization level? |
| 2025-04-30 22:12:38 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-04-30 22:11:57 +0200 | dolio | (~dolio@130.44.140.168) dolio |