2025/07/29

Newest at the top

2025-07-29 02:27:36 +0200caubert(~caubert@user/caubert) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
2025-07-29 02:27:08 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-07-29 02:22:34 +0200caubert(~caubert@user/caubert) caubert
2025-07-29 02:17:36 +0200 <dolio> Yeah, my understanding is that the GHC heuristic is, "only eliminate common subexpressions that are within a scope where the expression has already been evaluated." That basically guarantees that you don't start leaking references.
2025-07-29 02:16:39 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
2025-07-29 02:11:38 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-07-29 02:07:38 +0200peterbecich(~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) peterbecich
2025-07-29 02:06:23 +0200Square(~Square@user/square) Square
2025-07-29 02:05:52 +0200Square2(~Square@user/square) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-07-29 02:00:50 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2025-07-29 01:56:14 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-07-29 01:54:44 +0200caubert(~caubert@user/caubert) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-07-29 01:49:34 +0200caubert(~caubert@user/caubert) caubert
2025-07-29 01:47:10 +0200machinedgod(~machinedg@d75-159-126-101.abhsia.telus.net) machinedgod
2025-07-29 01:45:23 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2025-07-29 01:40:51 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-07-29 01:40:10 +0200jespada(~jespada@2800:a4:22e3:2500:9c17:f25b:c82f:98c4) jespada
2025-07-29 01:38:37 +0200 <monochrom> You can always use conservative heuristics to decide "maybe don't share this one".
2025-07-29 01:38:25 +0200ljdarj1ljdarj
2025-07-29 01:38:25 +0200ljdarj(~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2025-07-29 01:36:53 +0200jespada(~jespada@2800:a4:22e6:7f00:4c54:9542:8c12:7391) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2025-07-29 01:36:49 +0200athan(~athan@syn-047-132-161-157.res.spectrum.com) athan
2025-07-29 01:36:36 +0200ljdarj1(~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj
2025-07-29 01:29:54 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-07-29 01:25:27 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-07-29 01:22:14 +0200wickedjargon(~user@S0106f89e28d5699a.vc.shawcable.net) wickedjargon
2025-07-29 01:21:03 +0200sprotte24(~sprotte24@p200300d16f257c0005fe6f8bca8e5e30.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Quit: Leaving)
2025-07-29 01:14:29 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2025-07-29 01:10:05 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-07-29 00:59:28 +0200ljdarj(~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj
2025-07-29 00:58:38 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-07-29 00:54:08 +0200ljdarj(~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2025-07-29 00:53:27 +0200amadaluzia(~amadaluzi@user/amadaluzia) (Quit: ZNC 1.10.1 - https://znc.in)
2025-07-29 00:52:02 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-07-29 00:48:06 +0200pie_(~pie_bnc@user/pie/x-2818909) ()
2025-07-29 00:43:14 +0200caubert(~caubert@user/caubert) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-07-29 00:42:45 +0200dtman34(~dtman34@c-73-242-68-179.hsd1.mn.comcast.net) dtman34
2025-07-29 00:41:02 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-07-29 00:38:43 +0200caubert(~caubert@user/caubert) caubert
2025-07-29 00:38:37 +0200araujo(~araujo@216.73.163.169) araujo
2025-07-29 00:36:39 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-07-29 00:29:10 +0200dtman34(~dtman34@2601:447:d182:6512:c2f9:c3a:b83d:6490) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
2025-07-29 00:25:48 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2025-07-29 00:25:34 +0200caubert(~caubert@user/caubert) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-07-29 00:25:20 +0200biberu(~biberu@user/biberu) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-07-29 00:24:35 +0200 <dolio> I guess the answer to your implied question is that it's easier than graph isomorphism, because it's graph equality. It's only successful if the node names (package names + build flags) are exactly the same.
2025-07-29 00:21:15 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-07-29 00:19:56 +0200Sgeo(~Sgeo@user/sgeo) Sgeo
2025-07-29 00:15:30 +0200trickard_trickard
2025-07-29 00:15:00 +0200ljdarj(~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj