Newest at the top
| 2025-07-29 02:32:34 +0200 | califax | (~califax@user/califx) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-07-29 02:31:42 +0200 | stef204 | (~stef204@user/stef204) (Quit: WeeChat 4.2.1) |
| 2025-07-29 02:27:36 +0200 | caubert | (~caubert@user/caubert) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) |
| 2025-07-29 02:27:08 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-07-29 02:22:34 +0200 | caubert | (~caubert@user/caubert) caubert |
| 2025-07-29 02:17:36 +0200 | <dolio> | Yeah, my understanding is that the GHC heuristic is, "only eliminate common subexpressions that are within a scope where the expression has already been evaluated." That basically guarantees that you don't start leaking references. |
| 2025-07-29 02:16:39 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) |
| 2025-07-29 02:11:38 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-07-29 02:07:38 +0200 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) peterbecich |
| 2025-07-29 02:06:23 +0200 | Square | (~Square@user/square) Square |
| 2025-07-29 02:05:52 +0200 | Square2 | (~Square@user/square) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-07-29 02:00:50 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
| 2025-07-29 01:56:14 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-07-29 01:54:44 +0200 | caubert | (~caubert@user/caubert) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-07-29 01:49:34 +0200 | caubert | (~caubert@user/caubert) caubert |
| 2025-07-29 01:47:10 +0200 | machinedgod | (~machinedg@d75-159-126-101.abhsia.telus.net) machinedgod |
| 2025-07-29 01:45:23 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
| 2025-07-29 01:40:51 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-07-29 01:40:10 +0200 | jespada | (~jespada@2800:a4:22e3:2500:9c17:f25b:c82f:98c4) jespada |
| 2025-07-29 01:38:37 +0200 | <monochrom> | You can always use conservative heuristics to decide "maybe don't share this one". |
| 2025-07-29 01:38:25 +0200 | ljdarj1 | ljdarj |
| 2025-07-29 01:38:25 +0200 | ljdarj | (~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
| 2025-07-29 01:36:53 +0200 | jespada | (~jespada@2800:a4:22e6:7f00:4c54:9542:8c12:7391) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
| 2025-07-29 01:36:49 +0200 | athan | (~athan@syn-047-132-161-157.res.spectrum.com) athan |
| 2025-07-29 01:36:36 +0200 | ljdarj1 | (~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj |
| 2025-07-29 01:29:54 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-07-29 01:25:27 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-07-29 01:22:14 +0200 | wickedjargon | (~user@S0106f89e28d5699a.vc.shawcable.net) wickedjargon |
| 2025-07-29 01:21:03 +0200 | sprotte24 | (~sprotte24@p200300d16f257c0005fe6f8bca8e5e30.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Quit: Leaving) |
| 2025-07-29 01:14:29 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
| 2025-07-29 01:10:05 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-07-29 00:59:28 +0200 | ljdarj | (~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj |
| 2025-07-29 00:58:38 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2025-07-29 00:54:08 +0200 | ljdarj | (~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
| 2025-07-29 00:53:27 +0200 | amadaluzia | (~amadaluzi@user/amadaluzia) (Quit: ZNC 1.10.1 - https://znc.in) |
| 2025-07-29 00:52:02 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-07-29 00:48:06 +0200 | pie_ | (~pie_bnc@user/pie/x-2818909) () |
| 2025-07-29 00:43:14 +0200 | caubert | (~caubert@user/caubert) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-07-29 00:42:45 +0200 | dtman34 | (~dtman34@c-73-242-68-179.hsd1.mn.comcast.net) dtman34 |
| 2025-07-29 00:41:02 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-07-29 00:38:43 +0200 | caubert | (~caubert@user/caubert) caubert |
| 2025-07-29 00:38:37 +0200 | araujo | (~araujo@216.73.163.169) araujo |
| 2025-07-29 00:36:39 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-07-29 00:29:10 +0200 | dtman34 | (~dtman34@2601:447:d182:6512:c2f9:c3a:b83d:6490) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) |
| 2025-07-29 00:25:48 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
| 2025-07-29 00:25:34 +0200 | caubert | (~caubert@user/caubert) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
| 2025-07-29 00:25:20 +0200 | biberu | (~biberu@user/biberu) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2025-07-29 00:24:35 +0200 | <dolio> | I guess the answer to your implied question is that it's easier than graph isomorphism, because it's graph equality. It's only successful if the node names (package names + build flags) are exactly the same. |
| 2025-07-29 00:21:15 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-07-29 00:19:56 +0200 | Sgeo | (~Sgeo@user/sgeo) Sgeo |