2025/04/05

Newest at the top

2025-04-05 13:43:23 +0200 <Angelz> hi lambdabot.
2025-04-05 13:36:17 +0200hattckory(~hattckory@bras-base-toroon4524w-grc-30-70-27-118-207.dsl.bell.ca) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2025-04-05 13:29:12 +0200hattckory(~hattckory@bras-base-toroon4524w-grc-30-70-27-118-207.dsl.bell.ca)
2025-04-05 13:28:44 +0200vanishingideal(~vanishing@user/vanishingideal) vanishingideal
2025-04-05 13:28:15 +0200hattckory(~hattckory@bras-base-toroon4524w-grc-30-70-27-118-207.dsl.bell.ca) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
2025-04-05 13:26:54 +0200vanishingideal(~vanishing@user/vanishingideal) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2025-04-05 13:25:29 +0200forell(~forell@user/forell) forell
2025-04-05 13:24:51 +0200internatetional_(~nate@2001:448a:20a3:c2e5:2654:9c7d:282c:a56a) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-04-05 13:23:54 +0200tromp(~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:80ac:965e:288a:e7e3) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2025-04-05 13:23:13 +0200hattckory(~hattckory@bras-base-toroon4524w-grc-30-70-27-118-207.dsl.bell.ca)
2025-04-05 13:21:20 +0200internatetional(~nate@2400:9800:320:db5f:1:0:1913:8d11) internatetional
2025-04-05 13:18:04 +0200internatetional_(~nate@2001:448a:20a3:c2e5:2654:9c7d:282c:a56a) internatetional
2025-04-05 13:17:57 +0200internatetional(~nate@2001:448a:20a3:c2e5:73ee:b330:880d:2daa) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-04-05 13:16:24 +0200target_i(~target_i@user/target-i/x-6023099) target_i
2025-04-05 13:14:51 +0200ljdarj(~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) (Quit: ljdarj)
2025-04-05 13:13:34 +0200ftzm(~ftzm@085080243028.dynamic.telenor.dk) (Quit: The Lounge - https://thelounge.chat)
2025-04-05 13:04:02 +0200lxsameer(~lxsameer@Serene/lxsameer) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-04-05 13:02:24 +0200Unicorn_Princess(~Unicorn_P@user/Unicorn-Princess/x-3540542) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-04-05 13:02:22 +0200caconym(~caconym@user/caconym) caconym
2025-04-05 13:02:18 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-04-05 13:01:50 +0200internatetional(~nate@2001:448a:20a3:c2e5:73ee:b330:880d:2daa) internatetional
2025-04-05 13:00:04 +0200caconym(~caconym@user/caconym) (Quit: bye)
2025-04-05 12:59:56 +0200Sgeo(~Sgeo@user/sgeo) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-04-05 12:58:43 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2025-04-05 12:57:22 +0200 <haskellbridge> <Morj> I haven't dug deeper yet, even when making this rust thing go faster is literally my day job >_>
2025-04-05 12:56:56 +0200 <haskellbridge> <Morj> There are a lot of ways to use gmp. There are several rust wrappers around it, and the performance can differ 5 times
2025-04-05 12:53:01 +0200digitteknohippieDigit
2025-04-05 12:52:39 +0200hattckory(~hattckory@70.27.118.207) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-04-05 12:51:45 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-04-05 12:50:34 +0200digitteknohippie(~user@user/digit) Digit
2025-04-05 12:49:05 +0200 <haskellbridge> <Liamzee> i guess the real question is, why is Haskell efficient on bigint if it's using gmp as a backend, but gmp itself isn't?
2025-04-05 12:47:43 +0200hattckory(~hattckory@70.27.118.207)
2025-04-05 12:39:58 +0200merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2025-04-05 12:38:09 +0200 <haskellbridge> <Liamzee> this is really, really weird, because the C isn't that much faster, 315 ms vs 430-480 ms on haskell
2025-04-05 12:35:21 +0200 <__monty__> (I was joking about the bigger is better, FYI.)
2025-04-05 12:34:57 +0200 <__monty__> Probably Haskell's div is just `fst . divMod` while in C the backing algorithm somehow shortcuts not needing an accurate remainder or the other way around, whatever.
2025-04-05 12:32:46 +0200 <haskellbridge> <Liamzee> because even with tdiv_qr on a junk variable, it's still increasing times by 30%
2025-04-05 12:32:28 +0200 <haskellbridge> <Liamzee> now i'm trying to figure out why, in haskell, using divMod is an optimization, but in C, using tdiv_qr is not
2025-04-05 12:32:00 +0200 <haskellbridge> <Liamzee> yeah
2025-04-05 12:28:19 +0200tremon(~tremon@83.80.159.219) tremon
2025-04-05 12:27:20 +0200 <haskellbridge> <magic_rb> Or smth like that
2025-04-05 12:27:15 +0200 <haskellbridge> <magic_rb> I think they meant 110% time, so 90% performance?
2025-04-05 12:24:14 +0200 <__monty__> Bigger is better, so beating C already, nice : D
2025-04-05 12:23:25 +0200cyphase(~cyphase@user/cyphase) cyphase
2025-04-05 12:16:45 +0200hattckory(~hattckory@bras-base-toroon4524w-grc-30-70-27-118-207.dsl.bell.ca) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
2025-04-05 12:14:54 +0200thuna`(~thuna`@user/thuna/x-1480069) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-04-05 12:14:08 +0200Digitteknohippie(~user@user/digit) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2025-04-05 12:05:14 +0200wootehfoot(~wootehfoo@user/wootehfoot) wootehfoot
2025-04-05 12:00:36 +0200Digit(~user@user/digit) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-04-05 11:59:22 +0200Digitteknohippie(~user@user/digit) Digit