2025/03/24

Newest at the top

2025-03-24 05:50:52 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-03-24 05:49:24 +0100inca(~inca@4-138-135-64.gray-ng.dsl.pinetreenetworks.com) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-03-24 05:45:50 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-24 05:44:48 +0100inca(~inca@4-138-135-64.gray-ng.dsl.pinetreenetworks.com)
2025-03-24 05:42:57 +0100michalz(~michalz@185.246.207.221)
2025-03-24 05:42:44 +0100inca(~inca@4-138-135-64.gray-ng.dsl.pinetreenetworks.com) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-03-24 05:39:00 +0100aforemny(~aforemny@2001:9e8:6cfe:bd00:f9e8:43f5:f8e4:75c8) aforemny
2025-03-24 05:38:24 +0100aforemny_(~aforemny@i577B13B9.versanet.de) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-03-24 05:37:30 +0100user363627weary-traveler
2025-03-24 05:35:45 +0100kh0d(~kh0d@212.200.65.82) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-03-24 05:35:09 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-03-24 05:30:52 +0100inca(~inca@4-138-135-64.gray-ng.dsl.pinetreenetworks.com) inca
2025-03-24 05:30:03 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-24 05:25:01 +0100kh0d(~kh0d@212.200.65.82) kh0d
2025-03-24 05:19:24 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-03-24 05:16:05 +0100 <EvanR> lol and the comments even mention it
2025-03-24 05:14:18 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-03-24 05:14:16 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-24 05:13:15 +0100 <EvanR> egyptian sqrt 2
2025-03-24 05:13:00 +0100 <EvanR> oh nice my terms are already a known sequence
2025-03-24 05:11:38 +0100kh0d(~kh0d@212.200.65.82) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-03-24 05:09:56 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee
2025-03-24 05:07:10 +0100kh0d(~kh0d@212.200.65.82) kh0d
2025-03-24 05:06:26 +0100 <haskellbridge> <dmjio> so I think there's an issue with "yield" in single core mode (non "-threaded") where "yield" is not creating a new thread schedule
2025-03-24 05:05:57 +0100 <haskellbridge> <dmjio> I ran my test with the "-threaded" RTS, and "yield" works there, but it _does not_ work in GHCi (which is single core)
2025-03-24 05:03:18 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-03-24 05:03:10 +0100 <lambdabot> [0,1,1,3,5,11,21,43,85,171]
2025-03-24 05:03:08 +0100 <monochrom> > let pell = 0:1:zipWith (+) (map (*2) pell) (drop 1 pell) in take 10 pell
2025-03-24 05:00:19 +0100jmcantrell(~weechat@user/jmcantrell) (Quit: WeeChat 4.5.2)
2025-03-24 04:58:44 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-24 04:49:17 +0100xff0x(~xff0x@fsb6a9491c.tkyc517.ap.nuro.jp)
2025-03-24 04:47:54 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-03-24 04:42:58 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-24 04:38:00 +0100xff0x(~xff0x@fsb6a9491c.tkyc517.ap.nuro.jp) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-03-24 04:38:00 +0100kh0d(~kh0d@212.200.65.82) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-03-24 04:35:15 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-03-24 04:33:19 +0100Square(~Square@user/square) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-03-24 04:33:08 +0100kh0d(~kh0d@212.200.65.82) kh0d
2025-03-24 04:30:27 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-24 04:29:50 +0100Square2(~Square4@user/square) Square
2025-03-24 04:29:10 +0100Garbanzo(~Garbanzo@2602:304:6eac:dc10::2e)
2025-03-24 04:28:39 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-03-24 04:28:18 +0100peterbecich(~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) peterbecich
2025-03-24 04:24:11 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee
2025-03-24 04:23:44 +0100tavare(~tavare@user/tavare) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-03-24 04:22:18 +0100tavare(~tavare@user/tavare) tavare
2025-03-24 04:22:03 +0100 <lambdabot> <hint>:1:60: error: parse error on input ‘in’
2025-03-24 04:22:01 +0100 <Axman6> > let pell = 0:1:zipWith (+) (map (*2) pell) (drop 1 pell) ( in take 10 pell
2025-03-24 04:21:38 +0100 <lambdabot> • Probable cause: ‘zipWith’ is applied to too few arguments
2025-03-24 04:21:38 +0100 <lambdabot> • Couldn't match expected type ‘[c]’ with actual type ‘[c] -> [c]’