2025/03/21

Newest at the top

2025-03-21 11:54:45 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2025-03-21 11:51:58 +0100ash3en(~Thunderbi@89.56.182.235) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-03-21 11:51:04 +0100Fijxu_(~Fijxu@user/fijxu) fijxu
2025-03-21 11:50:49 +0100Hafydd(~Hafydd@user/hafydd) Hafydd
2025-03-21 11:50:29 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee
2025-03-21 11:49:33 +0100noteness_(~noteness@user/noteness) nessessary129
2025-03-21 11:49:32 +0100Hafydd(~Hafydd@user/hafydd) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-03-21 11:49:32 +0100noteness(~noteness@user/noteness) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-03-21 11:49:32 +0100natto(~natto@129.154.243.159) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-03-21 11:48:43 +0100natto17(~natto@129.154.243.159) natto
2025-03-21 11:47:46 +0100Fijxu(~Fijxu@user/fijxu) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2025-03-21 11:45:21 +0100Ekho(~Ekho@user/ekho) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-03-21 11:43:04 +0100AlexZenon(~alzenon@94.233.240.210)
2025-03-21 11:42:48 +0100AlexZenon(~alzenon@94.233.240.210) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-03-21 11:42:08 +0100alp(~alp@2001:861:8ca0:4940:1861:ecb2:15d3:3a1d)
2025-03-21 11:39:01 +0100 <ski> "polyvariant submission" does sound like it suggests something like partial evaluation / program specialization, or related
2025-03-21 11:37:46 +0100 <ski> "We could not benchmark against ADIC because we were unsuccessful in getting ADIC to transform its own generated code." -- for higher derivatives ?
2025-03-21 11:36:57 +0100 <ski> "three files that contain the code that is transformed zero, one, and two times" -- sounds like it, yea
2025-03-21 11:36:14 +0100 <sprout> needs egel
2025-03-21 11:35:57 +0100 <ski> does any of those use source transformations ?
2025-03-21 11:34:20 +0100 <ski> /implementations
2025-03-21 11:34:06 +0100 <ski> yea, looks like a quite nice variety of different backend languages
2025-03-21 11:32:53 +0100 <ski> can't recall hearing about that one, before
2025-03-21 11:32:47 +0100 <ski> "Scheme->C" is a particular Scheme implementation ?
2025-03-21 11:32:40 +0100lortabac(~lortabac@2a01:e0a:541:b8f0:55ab:e185:7f81:54a4) (Quit: WeeChat 4.5.2)
2025-03-21 11:30:36 +0100 <Athas> Nice work, really!
2025-03-21 11:30:31 +0100 <Athas> See https://www.bcl.hamilton.ie/~qobi/ad2016-benchmarks/
2025-03-21 11:28:54 +0100 <ski> ah
2025-03-21 11:28:32 +0100gmg(~user@user/gehmehgeh) gehmehgeh
2025-03-21 11:28:29 +0100mniip(mniip@libera/staff/mniip) mniip
2025-03-21 11:28:04 +0100 <Athas> No, it is a bunch of implementations of the same program in various languages, followed by a performance comparison. Stalingrad is by far the fastest.
2025-03-21 11:27:20 +0100 <ski> it calls out to Scheme code, from Haskell ?
2025-03-21 11:26:51 +0100 <Athas> This is code from a benchmark suite to demonstrate how wonderful Stalingrad (an extension of Stalin) is.
2025-03-21 11:26:14 +0100 <ski> ah
2025-03-21 11:26:09 +0100 <Athas> ski: yeah, same people.
2025-03-21 11:25:56 +0100 <ski> any relation to the Stalin Scheme implementation, Athas ?
2025-03-21 11:25:39 +0100 <ski> mhm
2025-03-21 11:25:23 +0100 <ski> (lot of use of `let'-`in', rather than `where'. some redundant brackets (e.g. when defining some infix operators, or sometimes around function calls, or even conses). incorrect `Show' instance (ought to use `showsPrec', not `show')
2025-03-21 11:24:47 +0100synchromesh(~john@2406:5a00:24cf:bb00:19d8:9179:8622:bdf3) (Quit: WeeChat 4.1.1)
2025-03-21 11:24:38 +0100 <haskellbridge> <Liamzee> will probably try to figure out how to get it to cache lucid later
2025-03-21 11:24:15 +0100 <haskellbridge> <Liamzee> erm, not the lib, but the adapter for the lib
2025-03-21 11:23:44 +0100 <Athas> ski: it's written by Scheme programmers and specifically to resemble the style of a corresponding Scheme program.
2025-03-21 11:22:57 +0100 <haskellbridge> <Liamzee> oh well
2025-03-21 11:22:56 +0100 <haskellbridge> <Liamzee> [exa]: so it's the fault of the person who made the servant lib
2025-03-21 11:22:48 +0100 <ski> that `stalingrad' code looks a bit weird
2025-03-21 11:20:41 +0100 <Athas> tomsmeding: I gave it a shot yesterday, but received some type errors I couldn't figure out. Maybe I will try again.
2025-03-21 11:18:11 +0100 <tomsmeding> Athas: if you haven't yet, I recommend implementing 'ff' by Forward over ForwardDouble, I suspect it'll help quite a bit
2025-03-21 11:17:50 +0100mniip(mniip@libera/staff/mniip) (Ping timeout: 604 seconds)
2025-03-21 11:17:16 +0100 <tomsmeding> perhaps that just introduces busywork here? I don't know
2025-03-21 11:16:53 +0100 <tomsmeding> oh, the zero is relevant if you're doing nested AD I guess