2025/03/23

Newest at the top

2025-03-23 04:09:09 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-03-23 04:08:45 +0100 <haskellbridge> <dmjio> U.S. all went to Python and rust
2025-03-23 04:08:35 +0100 <haskellbridge> <dmjio> Guess europe is all that’s left
2025-03-23 04:08:34 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-03-23 04:05:35 +0100op_4(~tslil@user/op-4/x-9116473) op_4
2025-03-23 04:05:04 +0100op_4(~tslil@user/op-4/x-9116473) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-03-23 04:04:01 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee
2025-03-23 04:03:56 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-23 04:02:21 +0100 <geekosaur> not unusual, it's past midnight in Europe, 2300 in the eastern US, and I think just approaching wake-up time for Japan (but on Sunday so I wouldn't be surprised if people sleep in)
2025-03-23 04:01:44 +0100jjhoo(~jahakala@user/jjhoo) jjhoo
2025-03-23 04:01:34 +0100 <geekosaur> no, we're the only ones talking right now
2025-03-23 04:01:07 +0100 <haskellbridge> <dmjio> Just you and geekosaur, maybe the bridge is using yield
2025-03-23 04:00:19 +0100jjhoo(~jahakala@user/jjhoo) (Quit: leaving)
2025-03-23 03:58:15 +0100 <EvanR> like the cone of silence
2025-03-23 03:58:12 +0100 <EvanR> is the bridge busted somehow
2025-03-23 03:57:13 +0100 <haskellbridge> <dmjio> Black pilling rn where did everyone go
2025-03-23 03:56:37 +0100 <geekosaur> and sometimes when it is (I really ought to be more proactive about booting stuff to #haskell-in-depth)
2025-03-23 03:56:13 +0100 <geekosaur> this channel often goes a bit weird when nothing else is going on
2025-03-23 03:55:17 +0100hattckory(~hattckory@bras-base-toroon4524w-grc-30-70-27-118-207.dsl.bell.ca)
2025-03-23 03:55:12 +0100 <EvanR> here
2025-03-23 03:54:22 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-03-23 03:53:57 +0100 <haskellbridge> <dmjio> Is this a Haskell channel? Where do I go to talk about Haskell ?
2025-03-23 03:49:22 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-23 03:47:14 +0100hattckory(~hattckory@bras-base-toroon4524w-grc-30-70-27-118-207.dsl.bell.ca) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2025-03-23 03:40:09 +0100jmcantrell(~weechat@user/jmcantrell) jmcantrell
2025-03-23 03:38:14 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-03-23 03:37:35 +0100dtman34(~dtman34@c-75-72-179-251.hsd1.mn.comcast.net) dtman34
2025-03-23 03:34:27 +0100tavare(~tavare@user/tavare) tavare
2025-03-23 03:31:31 +0100regalk(~regalk@gateway/tor-sasl/regalk) (Quit: WeeChat 4.5.1)
2025-03-23 03:31:20 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-23 03:25:15 +0100bitdex(~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-03-23 03:25:10 +0100bitdex_(~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex) bitdex
2025-03-23 03:22:45 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-03-23 03:20:16 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-03-23 03:20:00 +0100dtman34(~dtman34@c-75-72-179-251.hsd1.mn.comcast.net) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-03-23 03:19:28 +0100hiecaq(~hiecaq@user/hiecaq) hiecaq
2025-03-23 03:18:30 +0100hiecaq(~hiecaq@user/hiecaq) (Quit: ERC 5.6.0.30.1 (IRC client for GNU Emacs 30.0.92))
2025-03-23 03:18:18 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee
2025-03-23 03:15:30 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-23 03:15:16 +0100_________(~nobody@user/noodly) _________
2025-03-23 03:13:00 +0100 <talismanick> although I guess they can fall back on plausible deniability
2025-03-23 03:11:44 +0100 <talismanick> but then we have a whole catalog of bad actors with real professional reputations to blacklist lol
2025-03-23 03:10:59 +0100dtman34(~dtman34@c-75-72-179-251.hsd1.mn.comcast.net) dtman34
2025-03-23 03:10:54 +0100 <talismanick> junior devs looking to pad their resumes by "contributing" bug reports?
2025-03-23 03:10:31 +0100 <regalk> That is really concerning...
2025-03-23 03:10:12 +0100 <talismanick> not sure what the financial payoff is in sending fake bug report, though
2025-03-23 03:08:23 +0100 <talismanick> they'll do what all Chinese companies do when you sue them for fraud and malpractice: dissolve and leave you holding the bag, the same scammers creating a new company under a different filing because they know they'll never face consequences
2025-03-23 03:07:11 +0100 <EvanR> surely when you sue them, their AI-in-place-of-real-lawyers will be the weak point
2025-03-23 03:07:00 +0100 <talismanick> not in China there isn't, apparently
2025-03-23 03:06:33 +0100 <EvanR> isn't there a law against this