2025/03/17

Newest at the top

2025-03-18 00:29:33 +0100ljdarj1ljdarj
2025-03-18 00:29:33 +0100ljdarj(~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2025-03-18 00:25:34 +0100ljdarj1(~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj
2025-03-18 00:25:20 +0100Sgeo(~Sgeo@user/sgeo) Sgeo
2025-03-18 00:21:52 +0100euleritian(~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-132-052.176.6.pool.telefonica.de)
2025-03-18 00:19:59 +0100 <EvanR> then let sit for 1 minute before serving
2025-03-18 00:19:48 +0100 <EvanR> keep microwaving the value until it's heating to sufficient temperature
2025-03-18 00:19:45 +0100euleritian(~euleritia@ip5f5ad695.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2025-03-18 00:19:36 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2025-03-18 00:19:27 +0100 <EvanR> it's cool
2025-03-18 00:19:27 +0100 <enikar> when i used until i use a pair (a, b) for a, and fst or snd to get the result (or something like it).
2025-03-18 00:19:24 +0100 <EvanR> I totally forgot about this function
2025-03-18 00:18:55 +0100robobub(uid248673@id-248673.uxbridge.irccloud.com) robobub
2025-03-18 00:17:32 +0100 <jle`> i'm not super thrilled with it but it's at least not as bad as a hypothetical 'while'
2025-03-18 00:16:52 +0100 <jle`> my same reaction lol
2025-03-18 00:16:36 +0100 <EvanR> what the heck
2025-03-18 00:16:31 +0100 <lambdabot> (a -> Bool) -> (a -> a) -> a -> a
2025-03-18 00:16:30 +0100 <EvanR> :t until -- what are we talking about again
2025-03-18 00:15:28 +0100 <jle`> since people see 'while' and usually think of while loops
2025-03-18 00:15:13 +0100 <jle`> yeah, my point is that 'until' isn't really analogous to "until loops", so a corresponding "while" wouldn't be analogous to "while loops" either, which is potentially confusing
2025-03-18 00:14:56 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-18 00:08:45 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2025-03-18 00:04:36 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee
2025-03-18 00:04:18 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2025-03-18 00:03:37 +0100simplystuart(~simplystu@c-75-75-152-164.hsd1.pa.comcast.net)
2025-03-18 00:03:29 +0100__monty__(~toonn@user/toonn) (Quit: leaving)
2025-03-18 00:03:22 +0100simplystuart(~simplystu@c-75-75-152-164.hsd1.pa.comcast.net) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
2025-03-18 00:00:19 +0100euleritian(~euleritia@ip5f5ad695.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de)
2025-03-17 23:59:10 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-17 23:56:53 +0100alp(~alp@2001:861:8ca0:4940:9fa:1f3a:663a:c7ca) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-03-17 23:54:41 +0100euleritian(~euleritia@95.90.214.149) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-03-17 23:47:54 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-03-17 23:39:39 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-17 23:35:06 +0100Tuplanolla(~Tuplanoll@91-159-69-59.elisa-laajakaista.fi) Tuplanolla
2025-03-17 23:30:14 +0100 <enikar> there is also Control.Monad.Extra.Loop but it's not stateful as in folds
2025-03-17 23:29:56 +0100 <geekosaur> also I recall encountering a BASIC dialect at uni which had statement modifiers including UNTIL
2025-03-17 23:28:54 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-03-17 23:28:45 +0100 <enikar> sometimes, I use until but in most cases I might as well write a go loop function.
2025-03-17 23:27:51 +0100 <geekosaur> perl has had until for a long time, but iirc these days it's disrecommended
2025-03-17 23:24:12 +0100 <EvanR> until loops might not be as common only because people think in such negative terms all the time
2025-03-17 23:23:53 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-17 23:23:37 +0100 <lambdabot> error: Variable not in scope: whileM
2025-03-17 23:23:37 +0100 <EvanR> :t whileM
2025-03-17 23:23:13 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-03-17 23:19:12 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee
2025-03-17 23:18:45 +0100 <jle`> but until loops are not as ubiquitous
2025-03-17 23:18:38 +0100 <jle`> i would guess there's no "while" in base because people might confuse it with while loops
2025-03-17 23:17:53 +0100 <jle`> i didn't realize `until` existed heh
2025-03-17 23:15:39 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-03-17 23:14:41 +0100 <haskellbridge> <Liamzee> lists are sort of effectful in themselves, no?