Newest at the top
| 2025-03-18 00:35:31 +0100 | synchromesh | (~john@116.251.144.215) synchromesh |
| 2025-03-18 00:29:33 +0100 | ljdarj1 | ljdarj |
| 2025-03-18 00:29:33 +0100 | ljdarj | (~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
| 2025-03-18 00:25:34 +0100 | ljdarj1 | (~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj |
| 2025-03-18 00:25:20 +0100 | Sgeo | (~Sgeo@user/sgeo) Sgeo |
| 2025-03-18 00:21:52 +0100 | euleritian | (~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-132-052.176.6.pool.telefonica.de) |
| 2025-03-18 00:19:59 +0100 | <EvanR> | then let sit for 1 minute before serving |
| 2025-03-18 00:19:48 +0100 | <EvanR> | keep microwaving the value until it's heating to sufficient temperature |
| 2025-03-18 00:19:45 +0100 | euleritian | (~euleritia@ip5f5ad695.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
| 2025-03-18 00:19:36 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) |
| 2025-03-18 00:19:27 +0100 | <EvanR> | it's cool |
| 2025-03-18 00:19:27 +0100 | <enikar> | when i used until i use a pair (a, b) for a, and fst or snd to get the result (or something like it). |
| 2025-03-18 00:19:24 +0100 | <EvanR> | I totally forgot about this function |
| 2025-03-18 00:18:55 +0100 | robobub | (uid248673@id-248673.uxbridge.irccloud.com) robobub |
| 2025-03-18 00:17:32 +0100 | <jle`> | i'm not super thrilled with it but it's at least not as bad as a hypothetical 'while' |
| 2025-03-18 00:16:52 +0100 | <jle`> | my same reaction lol |
| 2025-03-18 00:16:36 +0100 | <EvanR> | what the heck |
| 2025-03-18 00:16:31 +0100 | <lambdabot> | (a -> Bool) -> (a -> a) -> a -> a |
| 2025-03-18 00:16:30 +0100 | <EvanR> | :t until -- what are we talking about again |
| 2025-03-18 00:15:28 +0100 | <jle`> | since people see 'while' and usually think of while loops |
| 2025-03-18 00:15:13 +0100 | <jle`> | yeah, my point is that 'until' isn't really analogous to "until loops", so a corresponding "while" wouldn't be analogous to "while loops" either, which is potentially confusing |
| 2025-03-18 00:14:56 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-03-18 00:08:45 +0100 | alfiee | (~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) |
| 2025-03-18 00:04:36 +0100 | alfiee | (~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee |
| 2025-03-18 00:04:18 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
| 2025-03-18 00:03:37 +0100 | simplystuart | (~simplystu@c-75-75-152-164.hsd1.pa.comcast.net) |
| 2025-03-18 00:03:29 +0100 | __monty__ | (~toonn@user/toonn) (Quit: leaving) |
| 2025-03-18 00:03:22 +0100 | simplystuart | (~simplystu@c-75-75-152-164.hsd1.pa.comcast.net) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) |
| 2025-03-18 00:00:19 +0100 | euleritian | (~euleritia@ip5f5ad695.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) |
| 2025-03-17 23:59:10 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-03-17 23:56:53 +0100 | alp | (~alp@2001:861:8ca0:4940:9fa:1f3a:663a:c7ca) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-03-17 23:54:41 +0100 | euleritian | (~euleritia@95.90.214.149) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-03-17 23:47:54 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
| 2025-03-17 23:39:39 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-03-17 23:35:06 +0100 | Tuplanolla | (~Tuplanoll@91-159-69-59.elisa-laajakaista.fi) Tuplanolla |
| 2025-03-17 23:30:14 +0100 | <enikar> | there is also Control.Monad.Extra.Loop but it's not stateful as in folds |
| 2025-03-17 23:29:56 +0100 | <geekosaur> | also I recall encountering a BASIC dialect at uni which had statement modifiers including UNTIL |
| 2025-03-17 23:28:54 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2025-03-17 23:28:45 +0100 | <enikar> | sometimes, I use until but in most cases I might as well write a go loop function. |
| 2025-03-17 23:27:51 +0100 | <geekosaur> | perl has had until for a long time, but iirc these days it's disrecommended |
| 2025-03-17 23:24:12 +0100 | <EvanR> | until loops might not be as common only because people think in such negative terms all the time |
| 2025-03-17 23:23:53 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-03-17 23:23:37 +0100 | <lambdabot> | error: Variable not in scope: whileM |
| 2025-03-17 23:23:37 +0100 | <EvanR> | :t whileM |
| 2025-03-17 23:23:13 +0100 | alfiee | (~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2025-03-17 23:19:12 +0100 | alfiee | (~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee |
| 2025-03-17 23:18:45 +0100 | <jle`> | but until loops are not as ubiquitous |
| 2025-03-17 23:18:38 +0100 | <jle`> | i would guess there's no "while" in base because people might confuse it with while loops |
| 2025-03-17 23:17:53 +0100 | <jle`> | i didn't realize `until` existed heh |
| 2025-03-17 23:15:39 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |