Newest at the top
| 2025-03-16 23:34:28 +0100 | <mauke> | davean: what standards are you talking about? |
| 2025-03-16 23:31:01 +0100 | jmcantrell | (~weechat@user/jmcantrell) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2025-03-16 23:30:49 +0100 | MyNetAz | (~MyNetAz@user/MyNetAz) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-03-16 23:24:49 +0100 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2025-03-16 23:10:05 +0100 | <davean> | Also, frankly, I doubt anyone keeps the GNU style guide one. |
| 2025-03-16 23:09:31 +0100 | <davean> | Well, specificly 2, but you can tell them appart by file name. |
| 2025-03-16 23:08:30 +0100 | jmcantrell | (~weechat@user/jmcantrell) jmcantrell |
| 2025-03-16 23:06:26 +0100 | <davean> | Yes but there *is* infact a standard |
| 2025-03-16 23:05:42 +0100 | mange | (~user@user/mange) mange |
| 2025-03-16 23:05:40 +0100 | <geekosaur> | I think the main complaint would be that it would require cabal to impose some structure on changelogs so it could recognize whether it was there or not |
| 2025-03-16 23:03:59 +0100 | <davean> | Its a good warning |
| 2025-03-16 23:03:54 +0100 | <davean> | It seems worse to have it as a local thing for just yourself. |
| 2025-03-16 23:03:36 +0100 | <davean> | mauke: why not contribute it back as a warning for everyone? |
| 2025-03-16 23:01:14 +0100 | <geekosaur> | (external commands are implemented but there's not currently a plan for extending existing ones) |
| 2025-03-16 23:00:44 +0100 | <geekosaur> | starting to happen but not there yet |
| 2025-03-16 22:57:54 +0100 | alfiee | (~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
| 2025-03-16 22:53:31 +0100 | myme | (~myme@40.51-175-185.customer.lyse.net) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2025-03-16 22:53:07 +0100 | alfiee | (~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee |
| 2025-03-16 22:50:26 +0100 | <mauke> | I was hoping cabal would be extensible |
| 2025-03-16 22:48:48 +0100 | <davean> | That is outside the default scope for check, its clearly a warning level feature though |
| 2025-03-16 22:48:15 +0100 | <davean> | mauke: you tell it by adding the code there :) |
| 2025-03-16 22:48:13 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Quit: installing updates) |
| 2025-03-16 22:45:10 +0100 | <mauke> | :-( |
| 2025-03-16 22:43:14 +0100 | <merijn> | mauke: Not sure it can do that? |
| 2025-03-16 22:32:18 +0100 | MyNetAz | (~MyNetAz@user/MyNetAz) MyNetAz |
| 2025-03-16 22:27:46 +0100 | Digitteknohippie | Digit |
| 2025-03-16 22:27:13 +0100 | <mauke> | ? |
| 2025-03-16 22:25:51 +0100 | <davean> | https://github.com/haskell/cabal/blob/d93f06606cef7ff1df24c88488a9a706e5af770f/cabal-install/src/D… |
| 2025-03-16 22:25:21 +0100 | xatirig | (~xatirig@81.215.239.1) |
| 2025-03-16 22:22:24 +0100 | <mauke> | how do I tell 'cabal check' to verify that my changelog contains an entry for the current version? |
| 2025-03-16 22:21:09 +0100 | <mauke> | haha |
| 2025-03-16 22:20:28 +0100 | <merijn> | like, yesterday |
| 2025-03-16 22:20:20 +0100 | <merijn> | mauke: I only discovered due to modern cabal's warning about it xD |
| 2025-03-16 22:20:11 +0100 | halloy7351 | (~halloy735@81.215.239.1) (Quit: halloy7351) |
| 2025-03-16 22:20:08 +0100 | <merijn> | mauke: Same ;) |
| 2025-03-16 22:19:37 +0100 | <mauke> | love discovering cutting edge features from 2013 |
| 2025-03-16 22:19:14 +0100 | halloy7351 | (~halloy735@81.215.239.1) |
| 2025-03-16 22:18:05 +0100 | <merijn> | extra-doc-files do not |
| 2025-03-16 22:18:03 +0100 | <mauke> | yeah, just found that |
| 2025-03-16 22:17:54 +0100 | <merijn> | mauke: The one thing that should easily clinch the argument for you: extra-source-file changes invalidate the build cache |
| 2025-03-16 22:17:30 +0100 | <merijn> | mauke: extra-source-file predates extra-doc-file (which wasn't really popularised enough) |
| 2025-03-16 22:17:07 +0100 | <merijn> | extra-doc-file |
| 2025-03-16 22:17:06 +0100 | <mauke> | prior art seems split on this point |
| 2025-03-16 22:16:58 +0100 | <mauke> | is a changelog an extra-source-file or an extra-doc-file? |
| 2025-03-16 22:14:42 +0100 | target_i | (~target_i@user/target-i/x-6023099) (Quit: leaving) |
| 2025-03-16 22:11:56 +0100 | alfiee | (~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
| 2025-03-16 22:11:19 +0100 | MyNetAz | (~MyNetAz@user/MyNetAz) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-03-16 22:10:28 +0100 | <c_wraith> | it's just not implemented with the non-threaded runtime. I suggested an implementation and was told "that's a feature request, not a bug" |
| 2025-03-16 22:09:46 +0100 | <merijn> | oof |
| 2025-03-16 22:09:29 +0100 | <c_wraith> | merijn: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/stm-2.5.3.1/docs/Control-Concurrent-STM-TVar.html#v:registerDe… |