Newest at the top
2025-03-16 22:19:14 +0100 | halloy7351 | (~halloy735@81.215.239.1) |
2025-03-16 22:18:05 +0100 | <merijn> | extra-doc-files do not |
2025-03-16 22:18:03 +0100 | <mauke> | yeah, just found that |
2025-03-16 22:17:54 +0100 | <merijn> | mauke: The one thing that should easily clinch the argument for you: extra-source-file changes invalidate the build cache |
2025-03-16 22:17:30 +0100 | <merijn> | mauke: extra-source-file predates extra-doc-file (which wasn't really popularised enough) |
2025-03-16 22:17:07 +0100 | <merijn> | extra-doc-file |
2025-03-16 22:17:06 +0100 | <mauke> | prior art seems split on this point |
2025-03-16 22:16:58 +0100 | <mauke> | is a changelog an extra-source-file or an extra-doc-file? |
2025-03-16 22:14:42 +0100 | target_i | (~target_i@user/target-i/x-6023099) (Quit: leaving) |
2025-03-16 22:11:56 +0100 | alfiee | (~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
2025-03-16 22:11:19 +0100 | MyNetAz | (~MyNetAz@user/MyNetAz) (Remote host closed the connection) |
2025-03-16 22:10:28 +0100 | <c_wraith> | it's just not implemented with the non-threaded runtime. I suggested an implementation and was told "that's a feature request, not a bug" |
2025-03-16 22:09:46 +0100 | <merijn> | oof |
2025-03-16 22:09:29 +0100 | <c_wraith> | merijn: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/stm-2.5.3.1/docs/Control-Concurrent-STM-TVar.html#v:registerDe… |
2025-03-16 22:08:29 +0100 | <EvanR> | library best viewed in internet explorer |
2025-03-16 22:08:21 +0100 | <merijn> | c_wraith: Which function is crashing? |
2025-03-16 22:08:14 +0100 | <jle`> | (/s) |
2025-03-16 22:08:10 +0100 | <jle`> | what if you added -threaded to your library cabal stanza |
2025-03-16 22:07:48 +0100 | <c_wraith> | you just get to hack around one function always crashing when the non-threaded runtime is chosen. With code that should just be in the library |
2025-03-16 22:07:24 +0100 | <c_wraith> | as a library author, you don't get to choose the runtime. |
2025-03-16 22:07:22 +0100 | alfiee | (~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee |
2025-03-16 22:07:00 +0100 | <merijn> | c_wraith: People still using the non-threaded runtime is a bug ;) |
2025-03-16 22:06:51 +0100 | <jle`> | lisan al gaib |
2025-03-16 22:06:40 +0100 | <c_wraith> | I wish I could convince the GHC maintainers that a function crashing with the non-threaded runtime is in fact a bug. |
2025-03-16 22:06:37 +0100 | <merijn> | Clearly I'm a prophetic visionary with impeccable taste |
2025-03-16 22:06:19 +0100 | <merijn> | c_wraith: Only to a decade later which the GHC list discuss how to implement what I asked for |
2025-03-16 22:05:59 +0100 | <merijn> | c_wraith: I wrote a library because some GHC maintainers thought my suggestion was silly and no one would want that |
2025-03-16 22:05:49 +0100 | <jle`> | my libraries had a user once |
2025-03-16 22:05:20 +0100 | michalz | (~michalz@185.246.207.201) (Remote host closed the connection) |
2025-03-16 22:05:19 +0100 | <mauke> | data-default |
2025-03-16 22:05:15 +0100 | <c_wraith> | much to my surprise, that library even has a user now. |
2025-03-16 22:05:07 +0100 | <merijn> | Which lib is that? |
2025-03-16 22:05:05 +0100 | <c_wraith> | I once wrote a library because I didn't like a blog post. |
2025-03-16 22:04:57 +0100 | <merijn> | mauke: ;) |
2025-03-16 22:04:41 +0100 | <mauke> | and now it's 17 years old and has 841 direct, 14225 indirect reverse dependencies |
2025-03-16 22:04:21 +0100 | <mauke> | I once had a cute idea for a silly little haskell library |
2025-03-16 22:03:07 +0100 | takuan | (~takuan@d8D86B601.access.telenet.be) (Remote host closed the connection) |
2025-03-16 21:48:21 +0100 | robertm | (robertm@lattice.rojoma.com) robertm |
2025-03-16 21:48:05 +0100 | joeyadams | (~joeyadams@syn-162-154-010-038.res.spectrum.com) (Quit: Leaving) |
2025-03-16 21:47:16 +0100 | <merijn> | No, just A Doctor :p |
2025-03-16 21:47:01 +0100 | <EvanR> | are you The Doctor now |
2025-03-16 21:46:41 +0100 | robertm | (robertm@lattice.rojoma.com) (Quit: ...) |
2025-03-16 21:46:38 +0100 | <merijn> | I just realised some libraries I wrote are now a decade old :O |
2025-03-16 21:46:23 +0100 | <merijn> | EvanR: I already got that part down |
2025-03-16 21:46:16 +0100 | <EvanR> | not yak hair per second xD |
2025-03-16 21:45:49 +0100 | <EvanR> | optimize for long term maintainability |
2025-03-16 21:45:31 +0100 | <joeyadams> | I'm the devil on your left shoulder. |
2025-03-16 21:44:53 +0100 | <merijn> | joeyadams: Your doing a lousy job at convincing me not to yak shave :p |
2025-03-16 21:44:03 +0100 | <joeyadams> | If CApiFFI is better, why not contribute that to direct-sqlite, then write your interface on top of Database.SQLite3.Bindings or Database.SQLite3.Direct ? |
2025-03-16 21:43:17 +0100 | <merijn> | joeyadams: Sure, but I think iff I do significant work on it, I probably just want to also do something like base it on ResourceT |