2025/03/12

Newest at the top

2025-03-12 21:09:32 +0100 <tomsmeding> EvanR: it makes sense if you consider a lambda to be the "constructor" of the (->) type
2025-03-12 21:08:53 +0100 <EvanR> so lambda is WHNF, regardless of what's in it
2025-03-12 21:08:43 +0100 <tomsmeding> I get WHNF and NF, but is HNF useful for anything?
2025-03-12 21:07:55 +0100 <c_wraith> IIRC, that's the main difference from HNF
2025-03-12 21:07:35 +0100a_fantom(~fantom@2.219.56.221) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-03-12 21:07:35 +0100 <c_wraith> whnf doesn't reduce under a lambda, though, so (\_ -> 1 + 2) is in WHNF
2025-03-12 21:07:21 +0100pavonia(~user@user/siracusa) siracusa
2025-03-12 21:04:37 +0100infinity0(~infinity0@pwned.gg) infinity0
2025-03-12 21:00:00 +0100hiecaq(~hiecaq@user/hiecaq) (ERC 5.6.0.30.1 (IRC client for GNU Emacs 30.0.92))
2025-03-12 20:48:04 +0100j1n37(~j1n37@user/j1n37) j1n37
2025-03-12 20:45:01 +0100j1n37(~j1n37@user/j1n37) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-03-12 20:44:41 +0100 <EvanR> that's an application
2025-03-12 20:44:34 +0100 <EvanR> WHNFs aren't applications
2025-03-12 20:43:49 +0100infinity0(~infinity0@pwned.gg) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2025-03-12 20:39:32 +0100zungi(~tory@user/andrewchawk) andrewchawk
2025-03-12 20:37:49 +0100 <Inst> this is annoying, (+1) 2 isn't in WHNF, right?
2025-03-12 20:29:27 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2025-03-12 20:25:06 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee
2025-03-12 20:22:24 +0100zungi(~tory@user/andrewchawk) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2025-03-12 20:20:30 +0100chele(~chele@user/chele) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-03-12 20:20:23 +0100j1n37(~j1n37@user/j1n37) j1n37
2025-03-12 20:16:26 +0100weary-traveler(~user@user/user363627) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-03-12 20:16:09 +0100j1n37-(~j1n37@user/j1n37) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-03-12 20:14:34 +0100machinedgod(~machinedg@d108-173-18-100.abhsia.telus.net) machinedgod
2025-03-12 20:12:09 +0100weary-traveler(~user@user/user363627) user363627
2025-03-12 20:10:41 +0100notdabs(~Owner@2600:1700:69cf:9000:91e8:307c:455b:5f65) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-03-12 20:10:16 +0100econo_(uid147250@id-147250.tinside.irccloud.com)
2025-03-12 20:04:14 +0100jespada(~jespada@2800:a4:22b4:9a00:f994:da25:97cf:4452) jespada
2025-03-12 20:00:46 +0100caconym(~caconym@user/caconym) caconym
2025-03-12 20:00:04 +0100caconym(~caconym@user/caconym) (Quit: bye)
2025-03-12 19:55:51 +0100euphores(~SASL_euph@user/euphores) euphores
2025-03-12 19:55:22 +0100acidjnk_new(~acidjnk@p200300d6e7283f52eca5d8b1f7f6f1d4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) acidjnk
2025-03-12 19:53:39 +0100weary-traveler(~user@user/user363627) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-03-12 19:47:30 +0100 <tomsmeding> juri_: in case you wrote it to be fast: what array library did you use?
2025-03-12 19:43:33 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2025-03-12 19:40:40 +0100fun-safe-math(~fun-safe-@2601:1c2:1b7f:801f:14e6:e5d:241a:b56c) fun-safe-math
2025-03-12 19:40:10 +0100jespada(~jespada@2800:a4:22b4:9a00:f994:da25:97cf:4452) (Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2025-03-12 19:39:25 +0100fun-safe-math(~fun-safe-@2601:1c2:1b7f:801f:e1d3:88d5:3ff2:2f10) (Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.)
2025-03-12 19:39:01 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee
2025-03-12 19:21:18 +0100ubert(~Thunderbi@2a02:8109:ab8a:5a00:b341:438:8f09:aa92) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-03-12 19:10:12 +0100michalz(~michalz@185.246.207.205)
2025-03-12 19:07:59 +0100k_hachig_k_hachig
2025-03-12 19:07:57 +0100 <Square2> Also very work heavy to configure the schema part of it
2025-03-12 19:07:51 +0100k_hachig_(~k_hachig@2607:fea8:351d:ef0:a56d:37e8:f63c:429c) k_hachig
2025-03-12 19:07:17 +0100 <Square2> I tried OpenApi but it seems to create as much problems as it solves.
2025-03-12 19:06:43 +0100 <Square2> If you were to replicate a Haskell domain model in java (for JSON RPC purposes), when you control both client and server. And it's exploratory development, what approach would you take?
2025-03-12 19:02:02 +0100michalz(~michalz@185.246.207.221) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-03-12 19:01:52 +0100ft(~ft@p508db291.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) ft
2025-03-12 18:56:13 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2025-03-12 18:54:51 +0100 <Inst> putting the par / pseq notation back as bang patterns instead, it's running at the same speed without engaging the spark system