Newest at the top
| 2025-03-02 21:07:51 +0100 | <geekosaur> | sadly I think there's still stuff like emacs terminal that doesn't use ANSI |
| 2025-03-02 21:07:08 +0100 | alfiee | (~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee |
| 2025-03-02 21:06:19 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | likely :) |
| 2025-03-02 21:05:58 +0100 | <monochrom> | Perhaps s/no way to detect/no way I add extra logic to detect/ :) |
| 2025-03-02 21:00:48 +0100 | caconym | (~caconym@user/caconym) caconym |
| 2025-03-02 21:00:01 +0100 | caconym | (~caconym@user/caconym) (Quit: bye) |
| 2025-03-02 20:59:52 +0100 | ljdarj | (~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj |
| 2025-03-02 20:57:49 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | https://github.com/haskell/haskeline/pull/197 |
| 2025-03-02 20:57:19 +0100 | Jonno_FTW | (~come@user/jonno-ftw/x-0835346) Jonno_FTW |
| 2025-03-02 20:56:59 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | yes, there is, ANSI sequences have a well-defined set of terminator characters |
| 2025-03-02 20:56:46 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | > However, the prompt string must indicate the end of each escape sequence, since there's no way for Haskeline to detect it automatically. |
| 2025-03-02 20:55:29 +0100 | Jonno_FTW | (~come@user/jonno-ftw/x-0835346) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
| 2025-03-02 20:55:08 +0100 | cheater_ | cheater |
| 2025-03-02 20:55:04 +0100 | cheater | (~Username@user/cheater) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-03-02 20:52:41 +0100 | cheater_ | (~Username@user/cheater) cheater |
| 2025-03-02 20:50:06 +0100 | <monochrom> | I think yes. |
| 2025-03-02 20:44:47 +0100 | <int-e> | (If README.md was included, would hackage pick it up?) |
| 2025-03-02 20:44:24 +0100 | pavonia | (~user@user/siracusa) siracusa |
| 2025-03-02 20:43:25 +0100 | <int-e> | https://github.com/haskell/haskeline/blob/master/haskeline.cabal#L37 ...oh no README.md there |
| 2025-03-02 20:42:55 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | but point there! If the entry point to your software is a git repository, I might look around there, but if it's a haskell library, I expect to be pointed to stuff from hackage :) |
| 2025-03-02 20:42:27 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | I'm completely fine with github wikis; ace.js, the editor that the playground uses, has a whole bunch of info on a github wiki |
| 2025-03-02 20:42:06 +0100 | <int-e> | Still... nobody uses github wikis. It's not a thing. |
| 2025-03-02 20:41:53 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | the readme which is not shown on hackage :p |
| 2025-03-02 20:41:20 +0100 | <int-e> | Well, I guess the README points there too. |
| 2025-03-02 20:40:48 +0100 | Everything | (~Everythin@195.138.86.118) Everything |
| 2025-03-02 20:40:08 +0100 | <int-e> | So yeah I'd consider this hard to discover. |
| 2025-03-02 20:39:39 +0100 | <int-e> | Which I found because https://github.com/haskell/haskeline/issues/72 mentions a wiki :P |
| 2025-03-02 20:39:39 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | I'll make a small PR |
| 2025-03-02 20:39:14 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | it would be nice if that's also in the haddocks. :) |
| 2025-03-02 20:38:43 +0100 | <int-e> | there's https://github.com/haskell/haskeline/wiki/ControlSequencesInPrompt |
| 2025-03-02 20:36:15 +0100 | michalz | (~michalz@185.246.207.203) |
| 2025-03-02 20:36:14 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | I would consider all this together insufficient documentation for haskeline to accept \STX :p |
| 2025-03-02 20:35:33 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | perhaps this? https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/bash.git/tree/y.tab.c#n8330 |
| 2025-03-02 20:34:42 +0100 | <monochrom> | Oh interesting. |
| 2025-03-02 20:33:56 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | so perhaps bash accepts the same bytes, but the \[ \] parsing _is_ bash-specific? |
| 2025-03-02 20:33:11 +0100 | notdabs | (~Owner@2600:6c40:4300:950:2d43:42a2:e2d9:67c9) |
| 2025-03-02 20:32:54 +0100 | ash3en | (~Thunderbi@2a03:7846:b6eb:101:93ac:a90a:da67:f207) (Quit: ash3en) |
| 2025-03-02 20:32:54 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | https://superuser.com/a/301355 "The bash-specific \[ and \] are in fact translated to \001 and \002 at y.tab.c:7640." |
| 2025-03-02 20:32:49 +0100 | notdabs | (~Owner@2600:6c40:4300:950:2d43:42a2:e2d9:67c9) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-03-02 20:32:01 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | that's zsh, which has its own magic |
| 2025-03-02 20:31:24 +0100 | <geekosaur> | cf. https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/734343/ansi-escape-sequences-in-ps1-cause-incorrect-lengt… |
| 2025-03-02 20:31:07 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | iirc readline considers anything between \[ ... \] to be zero-width |
| 2025-03-02 20:30:53 +0100 | <geekosaur> | I believe that's actually from readline |
| 2025-03-02 20:30:52 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | my terminal passes 0x1d on ctrl-] |
| 2025-03-02 20:30:35 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | do you mean ctrl-] ? |
| 2025-03-02 20:30:29 +0100 | <lambdabot> | 2 |
| 2025-03-02 20:30:28 +0100 | <monochrom> | > ord ('\STX') |
| 2025-03-02 20:30:22 +0100 | <monochrom> | :( |
| 2025-03-02 20:30:17 +0100 | <lambdabot> | '\STX' |
| 2025-03-02 20:30:16 +0100 | <monochrom> | > ('\STX') |