Newest at the top
| 2025-02-26 21:59:15 +0100 | misterfish | (~misterfis@84.53.85.146) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-02-26 21:58:24 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2025-02-26 21:57:15 +0100 | Everything | (~Everythin@46-133-48-141.mobile.vf-ua.net) (Quit: leaving) |
| 2025-02-26 21:40:56 +0100 | todi | (~todi@p57803331.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) todi |
| 2025-02-26 21:39:20 +0100 | Guest0 | (~Guest0@2a00:20:0:8685:7afd:8c7b:235a:df44) (Client Quit) |
| 2025-02-26 21:38:49 +0100 | Guest0 | (~Guest0@2a00:20:0:8685:7afd:8c7b:235a:df44) |
| 2025-02-26 21:37:27 +0100 | misterfish | (~misterfis@84.53.85.146) misterfish |
| 2025-02-26 21:33:00 +0100 | ft | (~ft@p3e9bc68d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) ft |
| 2025-02-26 21:31:34 +0100 | ash3en | (~Thunderbi@2a03:7846:b6eb:101:93ac:a90a:da67:f207) ash3en |
| 2025-02-26 21:25:54 +0100 | alfiee | (~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-02-26 21:22:03 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-02-26 21:21:45 +0100 | alfiee | (~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee |
| 2025-02-26 21:17:10 +0100 | justsomeguy | (~justsomeg@user/justsomeguy) justsomeguy |
| 2025-02-26 21:12:20 +0100 | weary-traveler | (~user@user/user363627) user363627 |
| 2025-02-26 21:12:05 +0100 | hgolden | (~hgolden@2603:8000:9d00:3ed1:6ff3:8389:b901:6363) hgolden |
| 2025-02-26 21:10:28 +0100 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) |
| 2025-02-26 21:09:01 +0100 | lxsameer | (~lxsameer@Serene/lxsameer) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2025-02-26 21:05:24 +0100 | hseg | (~gesh@46.120.20.40) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) |
| 2025-02-26 21:04:18 +0100 | hgolden | (~hgolden@2603:8000:9d00:3ed1:6ff3:8389:b901:6363) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-02-26 21:01:50 +0100 | chiselfuse | (~chiselfus@user/chiselfuse) chiselfuse |
| 2025-02-26 21:01:16 +0100 | misterfish | (~misterfis@84.53.85.146) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2025-02-26 21:00:43 +0100 | caconym | (~caconym@user/caconym) caconym |
| 2025-02-26 21:00:39 +0100 | ljdarj | (~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj |
| 2025-02-26 21:00:02 +0100 | caconym | (~caconym@user/caconym) (Quit: bye) |
| 2025-02-26 20:59:30 +0100 | vanishingideal | (~vanishing@user/vanishingideal) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-02-26 20:58:10 +0100 | chiselfuse | (~chiselfus@user/chiselfuse) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-02-26 20:55:51 +0100 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) peterbecich |
| 2025-02-26 20:54:48 +0100 | zungi | (~tory@user/andrewchawk) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
| 2025-02-26 20:54:34 +0100 | acidjnk_new | (~acidjnk@p200300d6e7283f80fcc6edffa39079b3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) acidjnk |
| 2025-02-26 20:53:58 +0100 | pavonia | (~user@user/siracusa) siracusa |
| 2025-02-26 20:53:55 +0100 | weary-traveler | (~user@user/user363627) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-02-26 20:53:52 +0100 | <dolio> | Or use the variable length array at the end of a struct or something. |
| 2025-02-26 20:52:29 +0100 | <dolio> | Yeah, I can't find that, so I guess that doesn't work. You have to put all your structures in a union. |
| 2025-02-26 20:51:46 +0100 | <EvanR> | I thought this was this "hope my struct defined the same way for the first 16 bytes" will work if pointer to it is casted, which is use in the sockets API |
| 2025-02-26 20:50:28 +0100 | <EvanR> | yes unions work |
| 2025-02-26 20:47:29 +0100 | tccq | (~user@user/tccq) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-02-26 20:45:37 +0100 | <dolio> | Normally if you access the portion of a union that wasn't used to build it, it's undefined behavior, but there's special dispensation for structs. |
| 2025-02-26 20:44:46 +0100 | <dolio> | I don't know if you can do it with pointers. But you can put all the structs with the same prefix in a union, and access the members of the prefix via any of the union disjuncts. |
| 2025-02-26 20:40:24 +0100 | alfiee | (~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
| 2025-02-26 20:39:19 +0100 | misterfish | (~misterfis@84.53.85.146) misterfish |
| 2025-02-26 20:37:21 +0100 | misterfish | (~misterfis@84.53.85.146) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
| 2025-02-26 20:36:21 +0100 | sprotte24 | (~sprotte24@p200300d16f39ea0090c1360b4b7260ad.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 2025-02-26 20:35:41 +0100 | alfiee | (~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee |
| 2025-02-26 20:33:11 +0100 | Tuplanolla | (~Tuplanoll@91-159-69-59.elisa-laajakaista.fi) Tuplanolla |
| 2025-02-26 20:29:33 +0100 | <monochrom> | Yeah I think I saw the Linux Itanium-based one. |
| 2025-02-26 20:28:43 +0100 | <EvanR> | it might seem intuitive that structs which differ by being a prefix of another is compatible but its not |
| 2025-02-26 20:28:03 +0100 | <EvanR> | casting a pointer to an incompatible type is undefined behavior |
| 2025-02-26 20:27:15 +0100 | <dolio> | I don't really feel like finding it, though. |
| 2025-02-26 20:27:03 +0100 | ljdarj | (~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
| 2025-02-26 20:26:57 +0100 | <EvanR> | I was also pretty sure xD |