2025/03/12

Newest at the top

2025-03-12 05:40:21 +0100 <c_wraith> when it was module level, it did just say "turn on this extension to allow this"
2025-03-12 05:40:09 +0100 <EvanR> (and LANGUAGE OverlappingInstances is deprecated)
2025-03-12 05:40:05 +0100 <c_wraith> I guess when overlapping was moved to a per-instance pragma, they decided not to advise turning it on
2025-03-12 05:40:01 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-12 05:39:42 +0100 <EvanR> but at least doesn't tell me to turn it on xD
2025-03-12 05:39:37 +0100 <EvanR> GHC rejects my code because of overlapping instances
2025-03-12 05:39:23 +0100 <EvanR> I tried it
2025-03-12 05:35:46 +0100 <euouae> oh I see
2025-03-12 05:35:09 +0100 <EvanR> ok nvm that
2025-03-12 05:34:51 +0100 <c_wraith> and that's when things get fragile
2025-03-12 05:34:45 +0100 <c_wraith> So then ghc is going to tell you to allow overlapping
2025-03-12 05:34:37 +0100 <c_wraith> yeah, that example would trigger it, but that's not a problem. The problem is that that instance overlaps everything
2025-03-12 05:34:32 +0100 <EvanR> does the implied kind expected by the hypothetical Foo class make sense there
2025-03-12 05:34:24 +0100synchromesh(~john@2406:5a00:24cf:bb00:98ab:59f5:dcb3:c8fc) synchromesh
2025-03-12 05:34:04 +0100 <euouae> but I'm assuming you're saying that the more important/encountered issue is overlapping instances
2025-03-12 05:33:15 +0100synchromesh(~john@2406:5a00:24cf:bb00:c559:e625:333a:3d27) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-03-12 05:33:15 +0100 <euouae> perhaps if I did `instance Foo (F x) => Foo x where ...`?
2025-03-12 05:32:56 +0100 <euouae> I wasn't sure in what situation I'd run into undecidability with instance declarations
2025-03-12 05:31:23 +0100 <c_wraith> UndecidableInstances is basically always fine to turn on. It's when you do and then GHC tells you the next thing to do is turn on overlapping, you know you're doing something wrong.
2025-03-12 05:30:14 +0100mange(~user@user/mange) mange
2025-03-12 05:29:05 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2025-03-12 05:28:51 +0100 <EvanR> (unless you do overlapping instances and god help you)
2025-03-12 05:28:35 +0100 <EvanR> typeclasses aren't built to do the sort of "overriding" that you see in prototypal OOP. Your type either has a single instance for the class, or it doesn't. Not competing instances with priority
2025-03-12 05:27:16 +0100 <EvanR> it leads to overlapping instances
2025-03-12 05:27:03 +0100 <EvanR> then ekmett gets to that in the response
2025-03-12 05:26:51 +0100 <EvanR> the first thing I thought was "for some reason, this idea of default implementations that work for everything with a certain typeclass instance is frowned upon" and couldn't remember the reason
2025-03-12 05:26:13 +0100infinity0(~infinity0@pwned.gg) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2025-03-12 05:24:40 +0100 <euouae> but at the same time it's fine because of the functional dependency | m -> s in the definition of MonadState in mtl
2025-03-12 05:24:39 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-12 05:24:19 +0100 <euouae> what I gathered from the reddit post is that the 's' is not getting smaller and that is the issue
2025-03-12 05:23:33 +0100 <EvanR> which these smaller conditions guarantee
2025-03-12 05:23:16 +0100 <EvanR> it's really nice when the compiler knows that it will finish and not enter into an infinite loop
2025-03-12 05:22:58 +0100JuanDaugherty(~juan@user/JuanDaugherty) JuanDaugherty
2025-03-12 05:22:52 +0100 <EvanR> The constraint ‘Monad (t n)’ is no smaller than the instance head (Use UndecidableInstances to permit this)
2025-03-12 05:18:43 +0100 <euouae> This thread <https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/5zjwym/when_is_undecidableinstances_okay_to_use/> has good info on UndecidableInstances, the other two were easier to understand
2025-03-12 05:13:39 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-03-12 05:06:58 +0100euouae(~euouae@user/euouae) euouae
2025-03-12 05:06:34 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-12 05:01:25 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-03-12 05:00:29 +0100vanishingideal(~vanishing@user/vanishingideal) vanishingideal
2025-03-12 04:58:27 +0100vanishingideal(~vanishing@user/vanishingideal) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-03-12 04:57:21 +0100alfiee(~alfiee@user/alfiee) alfiee
2025-03-12 04:55:26 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-03-12 04:51:13 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-12 04:44:57 +0100izzyfalco(~jake_pers@user/izzyfalco) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
2025-03-12 04:43:31 +0100yegorc(~yegorc@user/yegorc) (Quit: Leaving)
2025-03-12 04:40:49 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-03-12 04:35:51 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-03-12 04:34:04 +0100Smiles(uid551636@id-551636.lymington.irccloud.com) (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
2025-03-12 04:30:30 +0100enikar(~enikar@user/enikar) (Quit: WeeChat 4.5.1)