Newest at the top
| 2026-02-23 14:51:17 +0100 | DragonMaus | (~DragonMau@user/dragonmaus) (Server closed connection) |
| 2026-02-23 14:50:45 +0100 | <merijn> | You're not required to use that |
| 2026-02-23 14:50:41 +0100 | <merijn> | I mean, that's just an example |
| 2026-02-23 14:49:55 +0100 | <Milan_Vanca> | merijn: If you look here https://www.stackage.org/package/wai it uses OverloadedStrings |
| 2026-02-23 14:42:20 +0100 | <merijn> | Milan_Vanca: What are you using the IsString for bytestring for anyway? |
| 2026-02-23 14:38:52 +0100 | CloneOfNone | (~CloneOfNo@user/CloneOfNone) CloneOfNone |
| 2026-02-23 14:38:37 +0100 | CloneOfNone | (~CloneOfNo@user/CloneOfNone) (Server closed connection) |
| 2026-02-23 14:30:37 +0100 | dyniec | (~dyniec@dybiec.info) dyniec |
| 2026-02-23 14:28:21 +0100 | califax | (~califax@user/califx) califx |
| 2026-02-23 14:27:02 +0100 | dyniec | (~dyniec@dybiec.info) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2026-02-23 14:26:58 +0100 | tromp | (~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:309d:e3b0:b1c4:2c66) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…) |
| 2026-02-23 14:26:12 +0100 | califax_ | (~califax@user/califx) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2026-02-23 14:25:06 +0100 | califax | (~califax@user/califx) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2026-02-23 14:24:52 +0100 | GoldsteinQ | (~goldstein@goldstein.lol) |
| 2026-02-23 14:24:37 +0100 | GoldsteinQ | (~goldstein@goldstein.lol) (Server closed connection) |
| 2026-02-23 14:20:54 +0100 | califax_ | (~califax@user/califx) califx |
| 2026-02-23 14:19:42 +0100 | dyniec | (~dyniec@dybiec.info) |
| 2026-02-23 14:15:47 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@77.242.116.146) merijn |
| 2026-02-23 14:15:00 +0100 | mrvdb | (~mrvdb@2001:19f0:5000:8582:5400:ff:fe07:3df5) mrvdb |
| 2026-02-23 14:14:46 +0100 | mrvdb | (~mrvdb@185.92.221.186) (Server closed connection) |
| 2026-02-23 14:12:26 +0100 | <int-e> | . o O ( Not only is this a truly astonishing insight, it's also absolutely brilliant! ) |
| 2026-02-23 14:11:29 +0100 | philopsos1 | (~caecilius@user/philopsos) philopsos |
| 2026-02-23 14:10:10 +0100 | dibblego | (~dibblego@haskell/developer/dibblego) dibblego |
| 2026-02-23 14:10:10 +0100 | dibblego | (~dibblego@116-255-1-119.ip4.superloop.au) (Changing host) |
| 2026-02-23 14:10:10 +0100 | dibblego | (~dibblego@116-255-1-119.ip4.superloop.au) |
| 2026-02-23 14:09:57 +0100 | dibblego | (~dibblego@haskell/developer/dibblego) (Server closed connection) |
| 2026-02-23 14:07:52 +0100 | tromp | (~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:309d:e3b0:b1c4:2c66) |
| 2026-02-23 14:06:57 +0100 | <kuribas> | I liked it much better when interactive with AI felt more like a conversation. |
| 2026-02-23 14:05:38 +0100 | <kaol> | I hate it when the text generation box compliments me. "Absolutely brilliant leap to make" yeah right. |
| 2026-02-23 14:05:31 +0100 | comerijn | (~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
| 2026-02-23 14:04:18 +0100 | <kaol> | I just asked Gemini to explain EBMs and after staring at some code I asked that isn't this a comonad and it spouted an instance for it then. I haven't tried any of it yet. |
| 2026-02-23 14:02:48 +0100 | tromp | (~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:309d:e3b0:b1c4:2c66) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…) |
| 2026-02-23 13:58:29 +0100 | L29Ah | (~L29Ah@wikipedia/L29Ah) L29Ah |
| 2026-02-23 13:56:26 +0100 | erty | (~user@user/aeroplane) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
| 2026-02-23 13:50:15 +0100 | ec | (~ec@gateway/tor-sasl/ec) ec |
| 2026-02-23 13:49:49 +0100 | ec | (~ec@gateway/tor-sasl/ec) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2026-02-23 13:46:21 +0100 | <int-e> | or maybe it's just category theorists trying to attach themselves to an ongoing hype |
| 2026-02-23 13:45:20 +0100 | haritz | (~hrtz@user/haritz) haritz |
| 2026-02-23 13:45:20 +0100 | haritz | (~hrtz@2a01:4b00:bc2e:7000:d5af:a266:ca31:5ef8) (Changing host) |
| 2026-02-23 13:45:20 +0100 | haritz | (~hrtz@2a01:4b00:bc2e:7000:d5af:a266:ca31:5ef8) |
| 2026-02-23 13:40:39 +0100 | <kaol> | It's funny to see that the next big thing in AI is apparently comonads. |
| 2026-02-23 13:37:35 +0100 | <Milan_Vanca> | One user comments that all packages are in hackage only. But who knows. You probably need to look at sources or intercept requests to see where they go. |
| 2026-02-23 13:36:25 +0100 | <Milan_Vanca> | gentauro: https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/5d27c2/whats_the_difference_between_stackage_and_hackage/ |
| 2026-02-23 13:32:54 +0100 | myxos | (~myxos@174-18-58-141.tcso.qwest.net) myxokephale |
| 2026-02-23 13:32:30 +0100 | myxos | (~myxos@174-18-58-141.tcso.qwest.net) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2026-02-23 13:32:16 +0100 | <gentauro> | or at least, that's what I'm hopping for :) |
| 2026-02-23 13:31:59 +0100 | <gentauro> | Milan_Vanca: could be :) |
| 2026-02-23 13:24:57 +0100 | <Milan_Vanca> | gentauro: Isn't it just metadata? with some proxy to hackage? |
| 2026-02-23 13:20:18 +0100 | <gentauro> | How does `Stackage` get packages? Do they just replicate those from `Hackage`? |
| 2026-02-23 13:20:13 +0100 | oppili | (~oppili@user/nerdypepper) nerdy |