2026/04/04

Newest at the top

2026-04-04 00:14:07 +0000absurdvoid(~absurdvoi@user/absurdvoid) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2026-04-04 00:11:34 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2026-04-04 00:06:37 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-04-03 23:55:57 +0000merijn(~merijn@62.45.136.136) (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
2026-04-03 23:50:53 +0000merijn(~merijn@62.45.136.136) merijn
2026-04-03 23:47:57 +0000 <geekosaur> "-Wall" isn't all warnings, use "-Weverything" "-Weverything isn't all warnings either, there are some that must be enabled explicitly"
2026-04-03 23:43:32 +0000tromp(~textual@2001:1c00:340e:2700:f5b2:b468:1c7d:8570) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2026-04-03 23:38:35 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2026-04-03 23:33:50 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-04-03 23:31:14 +0000 <EvanR> don't even enable it
2026-04-03 23:31:08 +0000 <EvanR> extra warnings in another flag are secondary
2026-04-03 23:30:50 +0000 <EvanR> it doesn't have all warnings no but someone decided it has all warnings that must be taken seriously
2026-04-03 23:30:21 +0000 <EvanR> haha that whole issue boiled down to what -Wall means actually and culturally
2026-04-03 23:29:19 +0000wootehfoot(~wootehfoo@user/wootehfoot) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2026-04-03 23:26:54 +0000humasect(~humasect@dyn-192-249-132-90.nexicom.net) humasect
2026-04-03 23:24:32 +0000tremon(~tremon@83.80.159.219) (Quit: getting boxed in)
2026-04-03 23:20:18 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2026-04-03 23:17:34 +0000wennefer0(~wennefer0@user/wennefer0) (Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com)
2026-04-03 23:15:32 +0000arandombit(~arandombi@user/arandombit) arandombit
2026-04-03 23:10:21 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-04-03 23:05:00 +0000arandombit(~arandombi@user/arandombit) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2026-04-03 22:59:21 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2026-04-03 22:58:45 +0000bitdex(~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex) bitdex
2026-04-03 22:54:27 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-04-03 22:44:07 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2026-04-03 22:38:40 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-04-03 22:37:03 +0000divlamir(~divlamir@user/divlamir) divlamir
2026-04-03 22:32:59 +0000DigitteknohippieDigit
2026-04-03 22:30:23 +0000divlamir_(~divlamir@user/divlamir) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2026-04-03 22:27:45 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
2026-04-03 22:26:15 +0000divlamir(~divlamir@user/divlamir) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2026-04-03 22:26:05 +0000divlamir_(~divlamir@user/divlamir) divlamir
2026-04-03 22:22:38 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-04-03 22:12:53 +0000Sgeo(~Sgeo@user/sgeo) Sgeo
2026-04-03 22:11:30 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2026-04-03 22:11:08 +0000emmanuelux(~em@user/emmanuelux) emmanuelux
2026-04-03 22:09:33 +0000machinedgod(~machinedg@d172-219-48-230.abhsia.telus.net) machinedgod
2026-04-03 22:08:59 +0000bitdex(~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2026-04-03 22:07:59 +0000Guest20(~Guest20@149.3.7.235) (Quit: Client closed)
2026-04-03 22:06:51 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-04-03 22:05:10 +0000puke(~puke@user/puke) (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
2026-04-03 21:56:07 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2026-04-03 21:48:49 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-04-03 21:47:55 +0000 <tomsmeding> same for clang 21.1.6
2026-04-03 21:47:07 +0000 <tomsmeding> monochrom: I do not share your observations, I get no -Wunused-result for read(2) whatsoever on my system (linux, gcc 15.2.1), but I do get that warning for realloc() regardless of the optimisation level
2026-04-03 21:47:05 +0000 <monochrom> When confronted with an unused-value problem, some people go, "I know, I will store it in a fresh variable!". Now they have two problems. >:)
2026-04-03 21:44:41 +0000 <tomsmeding> monochrom: although now you have a -Wunused-but-set-variable ;)
2026-04-03 21:44:00 +0000 <tomsmeding> yes, I'm a little confused too
2026-04-03 21:43:41 +0000 <monochrom> Adding "int r; r =" kills the warning under -O2. So it is not even like "we need an elaborate live-variable analysis to discover unused results" :)
2026-04-03 21:37:56 +0000synchromesh(~john@2406:5a00:2412:2c00:343e:4e23:bce:73a3) synchromesh