2025/01/15

Newest at the top

2025-01-16 00:46:20 +0100 <haskellbridge> <sm> also sometimes even users prefer one or a few big packages, even if it's not optimal in bandwidth/disk space, it simplifies their life
2025-01-16 00:46:20 +0100 <jackdk> Guest71: and also, how large are these packages (and their combination)?
2025-01-16 00:46:07 +0100mrmr155334346318(~mrmr@user/mrmr) mrmr
2025-01-16 00:46:00 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-01-16 00:44:21 +0100 <haskellbridge> <sm> how many packages are you contemplating ?
2025-01-16 00:43:40 +0100 <haskellbridge> <sm> you're not wrong, sometimes it is worth providing separate packages for that reason. But there's a maintenance and packaging cost to be carried for everymore, fewer larger packages will be less work
2025-01-16 00:43:39 +0100Guest69(~Guest69@2601:642:4103:1b0:a477:319d:e581:377a)
2025-01-16 00:42:03 +0100ljdarj1ljdarj
2025-01-16 00:42:03 +0100ljdarj(~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2025-01-16 00:41:43 +0100califax(~califax@user/califx) califx
2025-01-16 00:41:00 +0100califax(~califax@user/califx) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2025-01-16 00:39:47 +0100ljdarj1(~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj
2025-01-16 00:39:13 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2025-01-16 00:33:39 +0100saulosilva(~saulosilv@181.216.220.107) (Quit: Client closed)
2025-01-16 00:32:16 +0100 <Guest71> On the topic of monopacking: I figured users would prefer to be able to pick micropackages as to avoid pulling in dependencies for pieces of the project they were not planning to use (reduce binary size and total logic surface). Am I wrong about this?
2025-01-16 00:32:16 +0100 <Guest71> sm: Thanks for your input. I was planning to use a prefix already, but I was wondering if there were additional conventions around grouping packages.
2025-01-16 00:31:11 +0100Midjak(~MarciZ@82.66.147.146) (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
2025-01-16 00:29:48 +0100sawilagar(~sawilagar@user/sawilagar) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
2025-01-16 00:28:32 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
2025-01-16 00:25:17 +0100stiell(~stiell@gateway/tor-sasl/stiell) stiell
2025-01-16 00:23:50 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2025-01-16 00:23:00 +0100stiell(~stiell@gateway/tor-sasl/stiell) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2025-01-16 00:20:30 +0100 <haskellbridge> <magic_rb> got it, somehow "DuplicateRecordFields" did it
2025-01-16 00:19:50 +0100notzmv(~umar@user/notzmv) notzmv
2025-01-16 00:17:48 +0100 <haskellbridge> <sm> maintenance and further packaging
2025-01-16 00:17:25 +0100 <haskellbridge> <sm> if you are able to publish as one package, it will simplify maintenance hugely
2025-01-16 00:16:37 +0100 <haskellbridge> <sm> Guest71: I probably wouldn't use a Hackage category or tag for this, I'd rely on a common package name prefix instead
2025-01-16 00:12:54 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-01-16 00:10:20 +0100sord937_(~sord937@gateway/tor-sasl/sord937) (Quit: sord937_)
2025-01-16 00:09:06 +0100Sgeo(~Sgeo@user/sgeo) Sgeo
2025-01-16 00:08:27 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2025-01-16 00:07:18 +0100__monty__(~toonn@user/toonn) (Quit: leaving)
2025-01-16 00:02:01 +0100mange(~user@user/mange) mange
2025-01-16 00:00:48 +0100 <haskellbridge> <magic_rb> if have a record such as "Foo { bar :: Text }" then I generate a lens called "bar", i cannot construct the record with "Foo { bar = "foobar" }". Is there any way around this? it complains about a ambiguous reference, though i dont see how he lens is a valid candidate on the LHS of "bar = "foobar"" anyway
2025-01-15 23:57:30 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-01-15 23:53:06 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2025-01-15 23:50:27 +0100tallcatparade(~tallcatpa@99-171-182-203.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-01-15 23:47:45 +0100saulosilva(~saulosilv@181.216.220.107) saulosilva
2025-01-15 23:44:05 +0100tallcatparade(~tallcatpa@99-171-182-203.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net)
2025-01-15 23:42:05 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-01-15 23:39:47 +0100tromp(~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2025-01-15 23:37:43 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2025-01-15 23:37:09 +0100weary-traveler(~user@user/user363627) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-01-15 23:33:31 +0100user363627(~user@user/user363627) user363627
2025-01-15 23:32:17 +0100hueso(~root@user/hueso) hueso
2025-01-15 23:31:20 +0100alp(~alp@2001:861:8ca0:4940:e814:f100:32a:4db4)
2025-01-15 23:26:42 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-01-15 23:22:41 +0100alp(~alp@2001:861:8ca0:4940:aeb3:d03c:ec66:af5f) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2025-01-15 23:22:19 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2025-01-15 23:21:53 +0100 <Guest71> - Anything else?