Newest at the top
| 2025-01-11 13:04:04 +0100 | AlexNoo | (~AlexNoo@94.233.240.147) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-01-11 13:03:52 +0100 | <kaol> | Even more. |
| 2025-01-11 13:03:45 +0100 | AlexZenon | (~alzenon@94.233.240.147) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-01-11 13:03:43 +0100 | <kaol> | I wrote it like that since I wanted to abuse $. |
| 2025-01-11 13:03:43 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <magic_rb> Cant wait for (* 4 (+ 4 5)) to be valid haskell code |
| 2025-01-11 13:02:48 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | LexicalNegation is relevant |
| 2025-01-11 13:02:34 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <magic_rb> Ye ik :P |
| 2025-01-11 13:02:26 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | magic_rb: that one is built-in :p |
| 2025-01-11 13:02:15 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <magic_rb> So yea, first we need UnaryOperators |
| 2025-01-11 13:02:14 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | ncf: apparently, and apparently NL is one of the few where it's written prefix |
| 2025-01-11 13:02:01 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <magic_rb> -10 is :) |
| 2025-01-11 13:01:53 +0100 | caconym | (~caconym@user/caconym) caconym |
| 2025-01-11 13:01:51 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | there aren't unary operators in the first place |
| 2025-01-11 13:01:42 +0100 | <ncf> | isn't € suffixed in most places that actually use € |
| 2025-01-11 13:01:34 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <magic_rb> {-# LANGUAGE PrefixUnaryOperators #-} when |
| 2025-01-11 13:01:06 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2025-01-11 13:00:51 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <magic_rb> In slovakia its postfix yeah |
| 2025-01-11 13:00:28 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | TIL |
| 2025-01-11 13:00:24 +0100 | AlexNoo_ | (~AlexNoo@178.34.160.135) |
| 2025-01-11 13:00:04 +0100 | caconym | (~caconym@user/caconym) (Quit: bye) |
| 2025-01-11 12:59:53 +0100 | <[exa]> | not everywhere :( |
| 2025-01-11 12:59:52 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | too bad that won't work with the syntax :p |
| 2025-01-11 12:59:27 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | the € symbol is written prefix |
| 2025-01-11 12:59:26 +0100 | ljdarj | (~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj |
| 2025-01-11 12:56:10 +0100 | <lambdabot> | 1.03 |
| 2025-01-11 12:56:08 +0100 | <ncf> | > let (€) = (*1.03) in (1.0 €) |
| 2025-01-11 12:54:37 +0100 | <[exa]> | kaol: wasn't there a library that literally allowed you to write "5 eur"? (via the usual typeclass trickery) |
| 2025-01-11 12:54:10 +0100 | acidjnk | (~acidjnk@p200300d6e7283f90c8dc7c78c19bd00e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) acidjnk |
| 2025-01-11 12:52:46 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-01-11 12:48:18 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2025-01-11 12:43:20 +0100 | ash3en | (~Thunderbi@2a03:7846:b6eb:101:93ac:a90a:da67:f207) ash3en |
| 2025-01-11 12:42:16 +0100 | <lambdabot> | 1.03 |
| 2025-01-11 12:42:15 +0100 | <kaol> | > let (€) = (*1.03) in (€) $ 1.0 |
| 2025-01-11 12:37:41 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
| 2025-01-11 12:32:56 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2025-01-11 12:31:35 +0100 | SlackCoder | (~SlackCode@64-94-63-8.ip.weststar.net.ky) (Quit: Leaving) |
| 2025-01-11 12:22:36 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) |
| 2025-01-11 12:19:50 +0100 | rachelambda8 | (~rachelamb@cust-95-80-25-71.csbnet.se) |
| 2025-01-11 12:18:21 +0100 | tnt1 | (~Thunderbi@user/tnt1) tnt1 |
| 2025-01-11 12:17:55 +0100 | tnt1 | (~Thunderbi@user/tnt1) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2025-01-11 12:17:28 +0100 | rachelambda8 | (~rachelamb@cust-95-80-25-71.csbnet.se) (Quit: β reduced) |
| 2025-01-11 12:15:58 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2025-01-11 12:14:41 +0100 | <kaol> | <$> is so similar to $ even down to the $ and I've gathered it's intentional except that's one thing where it isn't. |
| 2025-01-11 12:11:17 +0100 | tnt2 | tnt1 |
| 2025-01-11 12:11:17 +0100 | tnt1 | (~Thunderbi@user/tnt1) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
| 2025-01-11 12:11:09 +0100 | tnt2 | (~Thunderbi@user/tnt1) tnt1 |
| 2025-01-11 12:09:19 +0100 | <Leary> | kaol: The purpose of `$` is to be application that's a greedy as possible, by having the least precedence. If you have other expectations then you're misusing it. `g1 (g2 x)` and `(g1 . g2) x` are both cleaner options anyway. |
| 2025-01-11 12:08:42 +0100 | harveypwca | (~harveypwc@2601:246:d080:b40:1889:d9bf:2dd8:b288) (Quit: Leaving) |
| 2025-01-11 11:56:14 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
| 2025-01-11 11:54:59 +0100 | <Rembane> | kaol: Super legit, you can also write (fmap (f1 . f2) . g1 . g2) x |