2025/01/10

Newest at the top

2025-01-10 23:07:35 +0100 <mari51520> the interface will not need much logic anyways
2025-01-10 23:06:01 +0100 <euouae> Ah -- memory-wise. hm... OK fine. Maybe I'll do it in C++.
2025-01-10 23:05:31 +0100 <mchav> Memory and as result money, I guess. Have you profiled a sample implementation on your computer?
2025-01-10 23:05:00 +0100 <euouae> does the jumpstart matter?
2025-01-10 23:04:49 +0100 <euouae> mchav, OK but what do you mean costly? If my computations need 1+hr each?
2025-01-10 23:04:37 +0100 <mari51520> well but it makes sense to have a server for crunching and another for haskell
2025-01-10 23:04:32 +0100 <mchav> *GHC
2025-01-10 23:04:24 +0100 <mchav> Haskell is really heavy-handed for this sort of thing. It'll be costly just to have Haskell running on each instance.
2025-01-10 23:03:43 +0100 <euouae> also, for fun
2025-01-10 23:03:29 +0100 <euouae> I'm expecting Haskell to simplify the MPI integration
2025-01-10 23:03:24 +0100 <euouae> openMP is for single-host. if you want multi-host you need MPI. I don't have that code
2025-01-10 23:03:18 +0100tromp(~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2025-01-10 23:03:14 +0100 <haskellbridge> <magic_rb> But id recommend equinix or hetznee, theyre cheaper and more simple. Also youre not helping jeff bazos
2025-01-10 23:03:02 +0100 <mari51520> why do you need haskell-friendly then?
2025-01-10 23:02:55 +0100 <euouae> magic_rb: a single dedicated machine though?
2025-01-10 23:02:40 +0100 <euouae> mari51520: I don't depend on anything, it's all my own code. In C++ it was with OpenMP and libgmp/libmpfr.
2025-01-10 23:02:31 +0100 <haskellbridge> <magic_rb> On amazon cloud if you get a dedicated machine. You get a remote kvm and you can do whatever. Install freebsd if you want
2025-01-10 23:02:00 +0100 <euouae> but it depends on the level of control, that's what I mean by friendly
2025-01-10 23:01:50 +0100 <euouae> and it might not be supercomputers I need, maybe just amazon's cloud is fine
2025-01-10 23:01:35 +0100 <euouae> magic_rb: some supercomputers don't run ghc ... it depends on their setups
2025-01-10 23:01:28 +0100 <mari51520> huh for euouae prob
2025-01-10 23:01:18 +0100 <haskellbridge> <magic_rb> Or equinix
2025-01-10 23:01:03 +0100 <haskellbridge> <magic_rb> mari51520 i dont know what you mean by compute friendly hardware. Hardware is hardware, but for compute id look at hetzner dedicated servers.
2025-01-10 23:00:23 +0100 <haskellbridge> <sm> sim590: 👍️
2025-01-10 23:00:06 +0100 <mari51520> cool. Well i do not know many providers, everyone obviously is craze about amazon services while i have heard good reports about haskell&digitalocean in the past. I am too curious not to ask though: which lib are you relying on?
2025-01-10 22:59:18 +0100 <euouae> Specifically those were the numbers with C++, fixed width integers, and openmp. With MPI in place and bignum stuff, it'll probably take longer
2025-01-10 22:57:47 +0100 <euouae> it would be nice to go higher too, I haven't yet done any calculations that tell me roughly what n=7 or general 'n' look like, n=8 might not be feasible e.g.
2025-01-10 22:57:24 +0100 <euouae> I know that on 6 cores my operation for (say n=6) takes around an hour? I want to run it for say 1000 data points
2025-01-10 22:56:56 +0100 <euouae> I mean I've done that much
2025-01-10 22:56:19 +0100 <mari51520> huh i would advice starting from your personal machine
2025-01-10 22:55:01 +0100 <euouae> Hello, I've never done this before & I'm wondering if anyone has advice: If want to try some scientific computations of very specific number-crunching stuff I have in mind, how can I pay a reasonable amount to get access to some computing power? In particular haskell-friendly becuase I want to write it in haskell
2025-01-10 22:53:46 +0100euouae(~euouae@user/euouae) euouae
2025-01-10 22:49:55 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-01-10 22:47:47 +0100Smiles(uid551636@id-551636.lymington.irccloud.com) (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
2025-01-10 22:46:17 +0100housemate(~housemate@146.70.66.228) (Max SendQ exceeded)
2025-01-10 22:46:06 +0100housemate(~housemate@146.70.66.228) housemate
2025-01-10 22:45:25 +0100housemate(~housemate@146.70.66.228) (Max SendQ exceeded)
2025-01-10 22:45:13 +0100housemate(~housemate@146.70.66.228) housemate
2025-01-10 22:45:08 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2025-01-10 22:44:53 +0100SlackCoder(~SlackCode@64-94-63-8.ip.weststar.net.ky) (Quit: Leaving)
2025-01-10 22:44:37 +0100housemate(~housemate@146.70.66.228) (Max SendQ exceeded)
2025-01-10 22:44:26 +0100housemate(~housemate@146.70.66.228) housemate
2025-01-10 22:43:47 +0100housemate(~housemate@146.70.66.228) (Max SendQ exceeded)
2025-01-10 22:43:40 +0100housemate(~housemate@146.70.66.228) housemate
2025-01-10 22:42:29 +0100ahisho(~ahisoooo@88.90.222.87.dynamic.jazztel.es) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2025-01-10 22:34:24 +0100alecs(~alecs@61.pool85-58-154.dynamic.orange.es) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2025-01-10 22:34:16 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2025-01-10 22:32:37 +0100housemate(~housemate@146.70.66.228) (Max SendQ exceeded)
2025-01-10 22:32:15 +0100prasad(~Thunderbi@c-73-75-25-251.hsd1.in.comcast.net)
2025-01-10 22:32:09 +0100acidjnk(~acidjnk@p200300d6e7283f46ed3dd32d3de732cf.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) acidjnk