2025/12/01

Newest at the top

2025-12-01 10:44:55 +0100 <kuribas> Even worse in idris2.
2025-12-01 10:44:40 +0100 <lortabac> which of course isn't due to the programming paradigm but is still a factor
2025-12-01 10:43:55 +0100 <lortabac> for lots of tasks I'd probably be less efficient in Haskell due to a lack of libraries
2025-12-01 10:43:08 +0100 <lortabac> kuribas: that's very hard to determine in general
2025-12-01 10:40:37 +0100merijn(~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-12-01 10:36:18 +0100merijn(~merijn@77.242.116.146) merijn
2025-12-01 10:35:50 +0100Googulator20(~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-4ad8-d9ec-010d-f188-ffcb.pool6.digikabel.hu) (Quit: Client closed)
2025-12-01 10:35:50 +0100Googulator47(~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-4ad8-d9ec-010d-f188-ffcb.pool6.digikabel.hu)
2025-12-01 10:32:55 +0100 <kuribas> And for some tasks there is less advantages, like low level programming, complicated algorithms, ...
2025-12-01 10:31:11 +0100 <kuribas> But it's hard to convince others.
2025-12-01 10:31:07 +0100 <kuribas> I believe I am twice as efficient in haskell as in python/clojure/whatever.
2025-12-01 10:30:53 +0100inline__Inline
2025-12-01 10:30:13 +0100 <kuribas> Is there evidence that static functional typing leads to less defects and faster development time?
2025-12-01 10:27:50 +0100vanishingideal(~vanishing@user/vanishingideal) vanishingideal
2025-12-01 10:27:26 +0100mreh(~matthew@host86-146-25-125.range86-146.btcentralplus.com)
2025-12-01 10:24:40 +0100merijn(~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
2025-12-01 10:07:42 +0100vanishingideal(~vanishing@user/vanishingideal) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
2025-12-01 10:06:58 +0100emmanuelux(~emmanuelu@user/emmanuelux) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-12-01 10:00:22 +0100merijn(~merijn@77.242.116.146) merijn
2025-12-01 09:59:39 +0100humasect(~humasect@dyn-192-249-132-90.nexicom.net) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-12-01 09:57:31 +0100sord937(~sord937@gateway/tor-sasl/sord937) sord937
2025-12-01 09:54:44 +0100humasect(~humasect@dyn-192-249-132-90.nexicom.net)
2025-12-01 09:53:04 +0100sord937(~sord937@gateway/tor-sasl/sord937) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
2025-12-01 09:52:55 +0100emmanuelux(~emmanuelu@user/emmanuelux) emmanuelux
2025-12-01 09:52:03 +0100 <lucabtz> may ask also on #haskell-language-server if more appropriate
2025-12-01 09:51:49 +0100 <lucabtz> also ive been having this issue with the haskell language server on windows + vscode https://paste.tomsmeding.com/WH7UrKNr
2025-12-01 09:51:45 +0100emmanuelux(~emmanuelu@user/emmanuelux) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-12-01 09:44:54 +0100tromp(~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:9c00:2cdd:fe3f:e613)
2025-12-01 09:34:57 +0100humasect(~humasect@dyn-192-249-132-90.nexicom.net) (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
2025-12-01 09:30:37 +0100humasect(~humasect@dyn-192-249-132-90.nexicom.net) humasect
2025-12-01 09:30:37 +0100Sgeo(~Sgeo@user/sgeo) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-12-01 09:24:31 +0100tromp(~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:9c00:2cdd:fe3f:e613) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2025-12-01 09:18:07 +0100kuribas(~user@2a02-1810-2825-6000-91ce-6f5d-5219-16e3.ip6.access.telenet.be) kuribas
2025-12-01 09:13:50 +0100Googulator94(~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-4ad8-d9ec-010d-f188-ffcb.pool6.digikabel.hu) (Quit: Client closed)
2025-12-01 09:13:42 +0100Googulator20(~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-4ad8-d9ec-010d-f188-ffcb.pool6.digikabel.hu)
2025-12-01 09:09:41 +0100chiselfuse(~chiselfus@user/chiselfuse) chiselfuse
2025-12-01 09:09:07 +0100chiselfuse(~chiselfus@user/chiselfuse) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-12-01 09:01:16 +0100trickard_(~trickard@cpe-85-98-47-163.wireline.com.au)
2025-12-01 09:01:03 +0100trickard_(~trickard@cpe-85-98-47-163.wireline.com.au) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-12-01 09:00:32 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2025-12-01 08:56:18 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-12-01 08:56:06 +0100absence(torgeihe@hildring.pvv.ntnu.no)
2025-12-01 08:51:14 +0100 <lucabtz> hello, in https://hackage-content.haskell.org/package/adjunctions-4.4.3/docs/Data-Functor-Adjunction.html shouldn't it be saying "Any implementation is required to ensure that leftAdjunct and rightAdjunct witness an isomorphism from Hom(f a, b) to Hom(a, g b)" (replacing Nat with Hom)?
2025-12-01 08:46:51 +0100lucabtz(~lucabtz@user/lucabtz) lucabtz
2025-12-01 08:45:34 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2025-12-01 08:44:10 +0100chele(~chele@user/chele) chele
2025-12-01 08:41:13 +0100trickard_(~trickard@cpe-85-98-47-163.wireline.com.au)
2025-12-01 08:40:59 +0100trickard_(~trickard@cpe-85-98-47-163.wireline.com.au) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-12-01 08:40:49 +0100merijn(~merijn@host-vr.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2025-12-01 08:34:20 +0100Athas_Athas