2026/06/01

Newest at the top

2026-06-01 18:18:56 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2026-06-01 18:17:33 +0000divlamir_divlamir
2026-06-01 18:17:33 +0000divlamir(~divlamir@user/divlamir) (Ping timeout: 263 seconds)
2026-06-01 18:14:39 +0000divlamir_(~divlamir@user/divlamir) divlamir
2026-06-01 18:12:07 +0000peterbecich(~Thunderbi@71.84.33.135) peterbecich
2026-06-01 18:11:36 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-06-01 18:01:18 +0000tzh(~tzh@c-76-115-131-146.hsd1.or.comcast.net)
2026-06-01 18:00:50 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2026-06-01 17:58:43 +0000tnt1(~Thunderbi@user/tnt1) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
2026-06-01 17:56:09 +0000Raito_Bezarius(~Raito@libera/contributor/wireguard.tunneler.raito-bezarius) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2026-06-01 17:55:49 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-06-01 17:52:44 +0000chele(~chele@user/chele) (Remote host closed the connection)
2026-06-01 17:48:36 +0000lisbeths(uid135845@id-135845.lymington.irccloud.com) lisbeths
2026-06-01 17:46:21 +0000Square2(~Square@user/square) Square
2026-06-01 17:44:33 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2026-06-01 17:42:39 +0000Guest86(~Guest86@109-81-172-14.rct.o2.cz) (Client Quit)
2026-06-01 17:41:19 +0000Guest86(~Guest86@109-81-172-14.rct.o2.cz)
2026-06-01 17:41:01 +0000tnt1(~Thunderbi@user/tnt1) tnt1
2026-06-01 17:38:09 +0000 <newmind> i think with haskell predictability of performance is more of a problem than in the absolute. it's not always straightforward as in, say, C
2026-06-01 17:37:50 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-06-01 17:37:22 +0000wickedjargon(~user@207.194.126.30) wickedjargon
2026-06-01 17:36:57 +0000wickedjargon(~user@207.194.126.30) (Remote host closed the connection)
2026-06-01 17:36:16 +0000wickedjargon(~user@207.194.126.30) wickedjargon
2026-06-01 17:35:58 +0000 <sm> you meant reliably optimal performance, maybe
2026-06-01 17:35:39 +0000ft(~ft@p4fc2aedc.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) ft
2026-06-01 17:35:23 +0000 <sm> many haskell programs run "fast" by default, compared to some other languages
2026-06-01 17:34:57 +0000 <sm> I think that's a bit too strong
2026-06-01 17:28:59 +0000 <yin> performance is never an easy goal with haskell
2026-06-01 17:26:54 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2026-06-01 17:22:00 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-06-01 17:18:49 +0000vanishingideal(~vanishing@user/vanishingideal) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
2026-06-01 17:12:35 +0000Pozyomka(~pyon@user/pyon) pyon
2026-06-01 17:11:09 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2026-06-01 17:10:50 +0000Pozyomka(~pyon@user/pyon) (Quit: brb)
2026-06-01 17:10:20 +0000marinelli(~weechat@gateway/tor-sasl/marinelli) marinelli
2026-06-01 17:09:59 +0000marinelli(~weechat@gateway/tor-sasl/marinelli) (Remote host closed the connection)
2026-06-01 17:06:12 +0000merijn(~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn
2026-06-01 16:56:47 +0000tnt1(~Thunderbi@user/tnt1) (Remote host closed the connection)
2026-06-01 16:52:24 +0000euphores(~SASL_euph@user/euphores) euphores
2026-06-01 16:44:26 +0000Pozyomka(~pyon@user/pyon) pyon
2026-06-01 16:42:56 +0000Pozyomka(~pyon@user/pyon) (Quit: brb)
2026-06-01 16:41:50 +0000euphores(~SASL_euph@user/euphores) (Quit: Leaving.)
2026-06-01 16:36:15 +0000Pozyomka(~pyon@user/pyon) pyon
2026-06-01 16:31:13 +0000foul_owl(~kerry@94.156.149.95) (Ping timeout: 243 seconds)
2026-06-01 16:27:28 +0000Pozyomka(~pyon@user/pyon) (Quit: brb)
2026-06-01 16:22:08 +0000kuribas(~user@188.118.57.242) (Remote host closed the connection)
2026-06-01 16:21:45 +0000Pozyomka(~pyon@user/pyon) pyon
2026-06-01 16:20:45 +0000ricardomaps(~ricardoma@2804:14d:a040:81ea:9225:8669:d161:f359) (Quit: ricardomaps)
2026-06-01 16:20:08 +0000Pozyomka(~pyon@user/pyon) (Quit: brb)
2026-06-01 16:18:52 +0000vanishingideal(~vanishing@user/vanishingideal) vanishingideal