2024/12/29

Newest at the top

2024-12-29 03:32:16 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2024-12-29 03:27:53 +0100 <Leary> This is clearer when looking at a corresponding indexed applicative: `unit :: f i i (); fuse :: f i j a -> f j k b -> f i k (a, b)`
2024-12-29 03:27:51 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-12-29 03:24:00 +0100 <Leary> thirdofmay: The Atkey indexed monad has two indices for the same reason `Category` arrows do; its bind performs a kind of composition. Simple examples include the indexed writer monad, which writes category arrows rather than monoids, and the indexed state monad which has distinct types for the initial and final state.
2024-12-29 03:16:33 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2024-12-29 03:12:10 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-12-29 03:11:41 +0100 <lambdabot> Consider it noted.
2024-12-29 03:11:40 +0100 <Leary> @tell prsteele https://play.haskell.org/saved/J7bdQ5zn
2024-12-29 03:06:24 +0100peterbecich(~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2024-12-29 03:04:56 +0100thatonelutenist(8216c46202@2a03:6000:1812:100::fb3) thatonelutenist
2024-12-29 03:03:11 +0100euleritian(~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-135-074.176.6.pool.telefonica.de)
2024-12-29 03:00:21 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
2024-12-29 02:55:47 +0100comonad(~comonad@p200300d027182d00bcfd40be9d94d2dc.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
2024-12-29 02:54:07 +0100Square(~Square@user/square) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2024-12-29 02:54:03 +0100comonad(~comonad@p200300d0270bcb00d2bd35ff80c069c9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2024-12-29 02:53:02 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-12-29 02:52:22 +0100euleritian(~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-135-074.176.6.pool.telefonica.de) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2024-12-29 02:47:33 +0100machinedgod(~machinedg@d108-173-18-100.abhsia.telus.net) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2024-12-29 02:44:58 +0100peterbecich(~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) peterbecich
2024-12-29 02:39:49 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2024-12-29 02:37:53 +0100acidjnk_new3(~acidjnk@p200300d6e7283f42bc4ebb891d7561a4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2024-12-29 02:36:55 +0100 <hololeap> ok I think I see what you mean
2024-12-29 02:35:06 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-12-29 02:32:11 +0100 <ncf> i.e. applicative functors are monoids in the category of endofunctors *with Day convolution as the monoidal product*
2024-12-29 02:31:34 +0100 <ncf> well that doesn't tell you which monoidal structure you put on it
2024-12-29 02:31:29 +0100 <hololeap> (I barely understand this stuff so don't take me too seriously)
2024-12-29 02:30:10 +0100 <hololeap> isn't that usually just referred to as "the category of endofunctors"
2024-12-29 02:28:29 +0100 <ncf> i.e. the endomorphism monoidal category on Set in the bicategory of categories
2024-12-29 02:27:24 +0100 <ncf> composition of endofunctors
2024-12-29 02:27:14 +0100 <ncf> with composition as the monoidal product
2024-12-29 02:26:37 +0100 <hololeap> "with composition" seems like it would be redundant. isn't that implied by it being a category?
2024-12-29 02:25:55 +0100Smiles(uid551636@id-551636.lymington.irccloud.com) Smiles
2024-12-29 02:23:42 +0100 <ncf> (the one that monads are just monoids in)
2024-12-29 02:23:31 +0100 <ncf> i guess the one-sentence definition of an indexed monad is "category enriched in the monoidal category of endofunctors with composition"
2024-12-29 02:22:35 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2024-12-29 02:18:58 +0100sprotte24(~sprotte24@p200300d16f0bfe00711e65c2b30202f1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2024-12-29 02:17:48 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-12-29 02:08:03 +0100foul_owl(~kerry@193.42.0.124) foul_owl
2024-12-29 02:06:29 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2024-12-29 02:01:45 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-12-29 01:54:26 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2024-12-29 01:53:49 +0100foul_owl(~kerry@174-21-81-201.tukw.qwest.net) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2024-12-29 01:49:49 +0100merijn(~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-12-29 01:43:41 +0100Everything(~Everythin@195.138.86.118) (Quit: leaving)
2024-12-29 01:42:13 +0100Tuplanolla(~Tuplanoll@91-159-69-59.elisa-laajakaista.fi) (Quit: Leaving.)
2024-12-29 01:42:11 +0100mhatta(~mhatta@www21123ui.sakura.ne.jp)
2024-12-29 01:42:05 +0100 <ncf> there's some motivation here https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28690448/what-is-indexed-monad
2024-12-29 01:40:41 +0100 <ncf> are you thinking of exofunctors or something
2024-12-29 01:40:15 +0100 <geekosaur> maybe I'm completely confused, that was what I thought (part of) the point of it was
2024-12-29 01:38:30 +0100 <ncf> geekosaur: i don't think Set is an indexed monad?