Newest at the top
| 2024-12-28 17:34:04 +0100 | lxsameer | (~lxsameer@Serene/lxsameer) (Quit: WeeChat 4.4.2) |
| 2024-12-28 17:33:11 +0100 | euleritian | (~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-135-074.176.6.pool.telefonica.de) |
| 2024-12-28 17:32:50 +0100 | euleritian | (~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-135-074.176.6.pool.telefonica.de) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2024-12-28 17:32:15 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2024-12-28 17:31:27 +0100 | <enikar> | maybe don't do all the stuff in main will help |
| 2024-12-28 17:31:14 +0100 | <int-e> | (and there are more keywords to find) |
| 2024-12-28 17:30:26 +0100 | <int-e> | plitter: but the error you're getting is because `if` is a keyword |
| 2024-12-28 17:28:57 +0100 | <int-e> | plitter: you'd want a single `let` block |
| 2024-12-28 17:27:41 +0100 | <plitter> | was interested in at the end. Is there some compiler options that will let me do that? Or amI on the wrong track? |
| 2024-12-28 17:27:39 +0100 | <plitter> | I'm doing an advent of code https://adventofcode.com/2015/day/7 and thought I could use haskell to just input all the instructions but translated to haskell https://termbin.com/9u1q. But getting an error because of what I'm assuming is out of scope variable https://termbin.com/o4kn. I thought that haskell would wait with trying to input values until the end. And that I could just print the value I |
| 2024-12-28 17:27:16 +0100 | lxsameer | (~lxsameer@Serene/lxsameer) lxsameer |
| 2024-12-28 17:21:13 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2024-12-28 17:20:00 +0100 | bitdex | (~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
| 2024-12-28 17:16:56 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2024-12-28 17:16:11 +0100 | <hellwolf> | what is it? |
| 2024-12-28 17:16:07 +0100 | <hellwolf> | not sure how using "labels" would look like. |
| 2024-12-28 17:15:57 +0100 | <hellwolf> | asking for partially "anonymous" fields seems a stretch. Considering that in most languages, you don't have such a thing. |
| 2024-12-28 17:15:09 +0100 | <hellwolf> | but I probably should just export all fields. |
| 2024-12-28 17:14:24 +0100 | simplystuart | (~simplystu@c-75-75-152-164.hsd1.pa.comcast.net) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2024-12-28 17:14:19 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
| 2024-12-28 17:14:11 +0100 | <hellwolf> | labels, lenses, OverloadedRecordDot seems its own paradigm. |
| 2024-12-28 17:14:01 +0100 | simplystuart | (~simplystu@c-75-75-152-164.hsd1.pa.comcast.net) |
| 2024-12-28 17:13:07 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <loonycyborg> I'm wondering why record syntax is made in such a way you can't use indentation with it to get rid of {} |
| 2024-12-28 17:12:44 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <loonycyborg> were there any proposals to change that? |
| 2024-12-28 17:12:35 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <loonycyborg> I'm wondering why record syntax is made in such a way you can't use indentation with it |
| 2024-12-28 17:12:03 +0100 | <hellwolf> | :) |
| 2024-12-28 17:12:01 +0100 | <hellwolf> | 12-28 18:08 <int-e> hellwolf: hack hack hack: https://paste.tomsmeding.com/P0Xif3Ga |
| 2024-12-28 17:09:47 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2024-12-28 17:08:52 +0100 | <int-e> | hellwolf: hack hack hack: https://paste.tomsmeding.com/P0Xif3Ga |
| 2024-12-28 17:07:28 +0100 | euleritian | (~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-135-074.176.6.pool.telefonica.de) |
| 2024-12-28 17:06:15 +0100 | <geekosaur> | like I said, wart |
| 2024-12-28 17:06:07 +0100 | <geekosaur> | nor a way IIRC to say "this is actually used"; ghc's way to say "not used" is prefix underscore, but that messes with other ways to use the selector |
| 2024-12-28 17:05:33 +0100 | <geekosaur> | sadly there's no way to disable it only for some things |
| 2024-12-28 17:04:52 +0100 | <geekosaur> | I don't like OverloadedRecordDot much but it is at least a partial solution to records |
| 2024-12-28 17:04:46 +0100 | <__monty__> | Seems like a case of an overeager warning. There's probably a way to disable a warning with a pragma? |
| 2024-12-28 17:04:39 +0100 | euleritian | (~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-135-074.176.6.pool.telefonica.de) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2024-12-28 17:04:27 +0100 | euleritian | (~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-135-074.176.6.pool.telefonica.de) |
| 2024-12-28 17:04:25 +0100 | aerphanas | (~aerphanas@user/aerphanas) (Quit: WeeChat 3.8) |
| 2024-12-28 17:04:24 +0100 | <geekosaur> | it is best to treat traditional record syntax as a wart, and either work around it or switch to a newer one (labels, OverloadedRecordDot, lenses) |
| 2024-12-28 17:04:08 +0100 | tromp | (~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl) |
| 2024-12-28 16:58:21 +0100 | <hellwolf> | then there is a warning of that the function is not used. |
| 2024-12-28 16:57:08 +0100 | <__monty__> | But it doesn't actually make the field inaccessible so I'm not sure it's a good idea. |
| 2024-12-28 16:56:42 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) |
| 2024-12-28 16:56:32 +0100 | <__monty__> | You can selectively export field accessors from a module IIRC. |
| 2024-12-28 16:55:21 +0100 | euleritian | (~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-135-074.176.6.pool.telefonica.de) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2024-12-28 16:54:18 +0100 | euleritian | (~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-135-074.176.6.pool.telefonica.de) |
| 2024-12-28 16:53:03 +0100 | <hellwolf> | hmm, so, record syntax wise, you can not define a field that does not have a function, while others have? |
| 2024-12-28 16:52:14 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2024-12-28 16:46:12 +0100 | __monty__ | (~toonn@user/toonn) toonn |
| 2024-12-28 16:45:48 +0100 | euleritian | (~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-135-074.176.6.pool.telefonica.de) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |